Background: During the COVID-19 crisis, an apparent growth in vaccine hesitancy has been noticed due to different factors and reasons. Therefore, this scoping review was performed to determine the prevalence of intention to use COVID-19 vaccines among adults aged 18–60, and to identify the demographic, social, and contextual factors that influence the intention to use COVID-19 vaccines. Methods: This scoping review was conducted by using the methodological framework for scoping review outlined by Arksey and O’Malley. A search strategy was carried out on four electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. All peer-reviewed articles published between November 2019 and December 2020 were reviewed. Data were extracted to identify the prevalence of, and factors that influence, the intention to use COVID-19 vaccines. Results: A total of 48 relevant articles were identified for inclusion in the review. Outcomes presented fell into seven themes: demographics, social factors, vaccination beliefs and attitudes, vaccine-related perceptions, health-related perceptions, perceived barriers, and vaccine recommendations. Age, gender, education level, race/ethnicity, vaccine safety and effectiveness, influenza vaccination history, and self-protection from COVID-19 were the most prominent factors associated with intention to use COVID-19 vaccines. Furthermore, the majority of studies (n = 34/48) reported a relatively high prevalence of intention to get vaccinated against COVID-19, with a range from 60% to 93%. Conclusion: This scoping review enables the creation of demographic, social, and contextual constructs associated with intention to vaccinate among the adult population. These factors are likely to play a major role in any targeted vaccination programs, particularly COVID-19 vaccination. Thus, our review suggests focusing on the development of strategies to promote the intention to get vaccinated against COVID-19 and to overcome vaccine hesitancy and refusal. These strategies could include transparent communication, social media engagement, and the initiation of education programs.

There is a dearth of evidence synthesis on the prevalence of anxiety among university students even though the risk of psychological disorders among this population is quite high. We conducted a quantitative systematic review to estimate the global prevalence of anxiety among university students during the COVID-19 pandemic. A systematic search for cross-sectional studies on PubMed, Scopus, and PsycINFO, using PRISMA guidelines, was conducted from September 2020 to February 2021. A total of 36 studies were included, using a random-effects model to calculate the pooled proportion of anxiety. A meta-analysis of the prevalence estimate of anxiety yielded a summary prevalence of 41% (95% CI = 0.34–0.49), with statistically significant evidence of between-study heterogeneity (Q = 80801.97, I2 = 100%, p ≤ 0.0001). A subgroup analysis reported anxiety prevalence in Asia as 33% (95% CI:0.25–0.43), the prevalence of anxiety in Europe as 51% (95% CI: 0.44–0.59), and the highest prevalence of anxiety in the USA as 56% (95% CI: 0.44–0.67). A subgroup gender-based analysis reported the prevalence of anxiety in females as 43% (95% CI:0.29–0.58) compared to males with an anxiety prevalence of 39% (95% CI:0.29–0.50). University students seem to have a high prevalence of anxiety, indicating an increased mental health burden during this pandemic.

Background Machine learning (ML) offers vigorous statistical and probabilistic techniques that can successfully predict certain clinical conditions using large volumes of data. A review of ML and big data research analytics in maternal depression is pertinent and timely, given the rapid technological developments in recent years. Objective This study aims to synthesize the literature on ML and big data analytics for maternal mental health, particularly the prediction of postpartum depression (PPD). Methods We used a scoping review methodology using the Arksey and O’Malley framework to rapidly map research activity in ML for predicting PPD. Two independent researchers searched PsycINFO, PubMed, IEEE Xplore, and the ACM Digital Library in September 2020 to identify relevant publications in the past 12 years. Data were extracted from the articles’ ML model, data type, and study results. Results A total of 14 studies were identified. All studies reported the use of supervised learning techniques to predict PPD. Support vector machine and random forest were the most commonly used algorithms in addition to Naive Bayes, regression, artificial neural network, decision trees, and XGBoost (Extreme Gradient Boosting). There was considerable heterogeneity in the best-performing ML algorithm across the selected studies. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values reported for different algorithms were support vector machine (range 0.78-0.86), random forest method (0.88), XGBoost (0.80), and logistic regression (0.93). Conclusions ML algorithms can analyze larger data sets and perform more advanced computations, which can significantly improve the detection of PPD at an early stage. Further clinical research collaborations are required to fine-tune ML algorithms for prediction and treatment. ML might become part of evidence-based practice in addition to clinical knowledge and existing research evidence.

BACKGROUND Machine learning (ML) offers vigorous statistical and probabilistic techniques that can successfully predict certain clinical conditions using large volumes of data. A review of ML and big data research analytics in maternal depression is pertinent and timely given the rapid technological developments in recent years. OBJECTIVE This paper aims to synthesize the literature on machine learning and big data analytics for maternal mental health, particularly the prediction of postpartum depression (PPD). METHODS A scoping review methodology using the Arksey and O’Malley framework was employed to rapidly map the research activity in the field of ML for predicting PPD. Two independent researchers searched PsycInfo, PubMed, IEEE Xplore and the ACM Digital Library in September 2020 to identify relevant publications in the past 12 years. Data were extracted on the article’s ML model, data type, and study results. RESULTS A total of fourteen (14) studies were identified. All studies reported the use of supervised learning techniques to predict PPD. Support vector machine (SVM) and random forests (RF) were the most commonly employed algorithms in addition to naïve Bayes, regression, artificial neural network, decision trees and extreme gradient boosting. There was considerable heterogeneity in the best performing ML algorithm across selected studies. The area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC) values reported for different algorithms were SVM (Range: 0.78-0.86); RF method (0.88); extreme gradient boosting (0.80); logistic regression (0.93); and extreme gradient boosting (0.71) respectively. CONCLUSIONS ML algorithms are capable of analyzing larger datasets and performing more advanced computations, that can significantly improve the detection of PPD at an early stage. Further clinical-research collaborations are required to fine-tune ML algorithms for prediction and treatments. ML might become part of evidence-based practice, in addition to clinical knowledge and existing research evidence.

BACKGROUND Machine learning (ML) offers vigorous statistical and probabilistic techniques that can successfully predict certain clinical conditions using large volumes of data. A review of ML and big data research analytics in maternal depression is pertinent and timely given the rapid technological developments in recent years. OBJECTIVE This paper aims to synthesize the literature on machine learning and big data analytics for maternal mental health, particularly the prediction of postpartum depression (PPD). METHODS A scoping review methodology using the Arksey and O’Malley framework was employed to rapidly map the research activity in the field of ML for predicting PPD. A literature search was conducted through health and IT research databases, including PsycInfo, PubMed, IEEE Xplore and the ACM Digital Library from Sep 2020 till Jan 2021. Data were extracted on the article’s ML model, data type, and study results. RESULTS A total of fourteen (14) studies were identified. All studies reported the use of supervised learning techniques to predict PPD. Support vector machine (SVM) and random forests (RF) were the most commonly employed algorithms in addition to naïve Bayes, regression, artificial neural network, decision trees and extreme gradient boosting. There was considerable heterogeneity in the best performing ML algorithm across selected studies. The area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC) values reported for different algorithms were SVM (Range: 0.78-0.86); RF method (0.88); extreme gradient boosting (0.80); logistic regression (0.93); and extreme gradient boosting (0.71) respectively. CONCLUSIONS ML algorithms are capable of analyzing larger datasets and performing more advanced computations, that can significantly improve the detection of PPD at an early stage. Further clinical-research collaborations are required to fine-tune ML algorithms for prediction and treatments. ML might become part of evidence-based practice, in addition to clinical knowledge and existing research evidence.