When the three age groups were compared,the AUROC curve for CCI was significantly larger for patients aged < 65 years(p < 0.001) for both in-hospital and 1-year mortality. Conclusion: There were no differences in the clinical presentation of IE between the groups. Age ≥ 80 years, high comorbidity (measured by CCI),and non-performance of surgery were independent predictors of mortality in patients with IE.CCI could help to identify those patients with IE and surgical indication who present a lower risk of in-hospital and 1-year mortality after surgery, especially in the < 65-year group.

No abstract

Background Outpatient parenteral antibiotic treatment (OPAT) has proven efficacious for treating infective endocarditis (IE). However, the 2001 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) criteria for OPAT in IE are very restrictive. We aimed to compare the outcomes of OPAT with those of hospital-based antibiotic treatment (HBAT). Methods Retrospective analysis of data from a multicenter, prospective cohort study of 2000 consecutive IE patients in 25 Spanish hospitals (2008–2012) was performed. Results A total of 429 patients (21.5%) received OPAT, and only 21.7% fulfilled IDSA criteria. Males accounted for 70.5%, median age was 68 years (interquartile range [IQR], 56–76), and 57% had native-valve IE. The most frequent causal microorganisms were viridans group streptococci (18.6%), Staphylococcus aureus (15.6%), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (14.5%). Median length of antibiotic treatment was 42 days (IQR, 32–54), and 44% of patients underwent cardiac surgery. One-year mortality was 8% (42% for HBAT; P < .001), 1.4% of patients relapsed, and 10.9% were readmitted during the first 3 months after discharge (no significant differences compared with HBAT). Charlson score (odds ratio [OR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04–1.42; P = .01) and cardiac surgery (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, .09–.63; P = .04) were associated with 1-year mortality, whereas aortic valve involvement (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, .22–.98; P = .007) was the only predictor of 1-year readmission. Failing to fulfill IDSA criteria was not a risk factor for mortality or readmission. Conclusions OPAT provided excellent results despite the use of broader criteria than those recommended by IDSA. OPAT criteria should therefore be expanded.

Objectives (1) To describe the incidence, clinical characteristics, treatment and outcome of Aspergillus Endocarditis (AE) in a nationwide multicentric cohort (GAMES). (2) To compare the AE cases of the GAMES cohort, with the AE cases reported in the literature since 2010. (3) To identify variables related to mortality. Methods We recruited 10 AE cases included in the GAMES cohort (January 2008‐December 2018) and 51 cases from the literature published from January 2010 to July 2019. Results 4528 patients with infectious endocarditis (IE) were included in the GAMES cohort, of them 10 (0.2%) were AE. After comparing our 10 cases with the 51 of the literature, no differences were found. Analysing the 61 AE cases together, 55.7% were male, median age 45 years. Their main underlying conditions were as follows: prosthetic valve surgery (34.4%) and solid organ transplant (SOT) (19.7%). Mainly affecting mitral (36.1%) and aortic valve (29.5%). Main isolated species were as follows: Aspergillus fumigatus (47.5%) and Aspergillus flavus (24.6%). Embolisms occurred in 54%. Patients were treated with antifungals (90.2%), heart surgery (85.2%) or both (78.7%). Overall, 52.5% died. A greater mortality was observed in immunosuppressed patients (59.4% vs. 24.1%, OR = 4.09, 95%CI = 1.26–13.19, p = .02), and lower mortality was associated with undergoing cardiac surgery plus azole therapy (28.1% vs. 65.5%, OR = 0.22, 95%CI = 0.07–0.72, p = .01). Conclusions AE accounts for 0.2% of all IE episodes of a national multicentric cohort, mainly affecting patients with previous valvular surgery or SOT recipients. Mortality remains high especially in immunosuppressed hosts and azole‐based treatment combined with surgical resection are related to a better outcome.

Objective: To investigate the rate of colorectal neoplasms (CRNs) in patients who have Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis (EFIE) with available colonoscopies and to assess whether this is associated with the identification of a focus the infection. Patients and Methods: Retrospective analysis of data from a prospective multicenter study involving 35 centers who are members of the Grupo de Apoyo para el Manejo de la Endocarditis en España [Support Group for the Management of Infective Endocarditis in Spain] cohort. A specific set of queries regarding information on colonoscopy and histopathology of colorectal diseases was sent to each participating center. Four-hundred sixty-seven patients with EFIE were included from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2017, from whom data on colonoscopy performance and results were available in 411 patients. Results: One hundred forty-two (34.5%) patients had a colonoscopy close to the EFIE episode. The overall rate of colorectal diseases was 70.4% (100 of 142), whereas the prevalence of CRN (advanced adenomas and colorectal carcinoma) was 14.8% (21 of 142), with no significant differences between the group of EFIE of unknown focus and that with an identified focus. Conclusion:Our study adds to prior evidence suggesting a much higher rate of CRN among patients with EFIE than in the general population of the same age and sex. In addition, our findings suggest that this phenomenon might take place both in EFIE with an unknown and an identified source of infection.

No abstract

IntroductionSingle-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the region of the Interleukin 28B (IL28B) gene on chromosome 19, coding for the interferon (IFN)-λ3, are involved in hepatitis c virus (HCV), spontaneous clearance. There is little information on the degree of liver fibrosis (LF) in HIV patients, who have had spontaneous clearance of HCV. Our objective in this study is to assess the degree of liver fibrosis in this population, as well as to identify key genetic characteristics associated with spontaneous clearance.Materials and MethodsRetrospective descriptive study that evaluated from 1 January 2013 to 30 May 2014, the HIV-HCV coinfected patients in which it has been demonstrated spontaneous clearance of HCV infection. The main variables analyzed were (1) genetics: Haplotype determination of genetic polymorphism SNP rs12979860 in the region of IL 28B gene and (2) grade of LF measured in kilopascals (kPa) by transient elastography (TE).ResultsWe evaluated 205 patients with HIV and HCV coinfection, of whom, 17 patients (8.3%), presented spontaneous clearance. Fourteen patients (82.4%) had HIV CV<20 copies/mL, while the mean CD4 cell count was 396 (SD: 245) cells/mcL. Nine (53%) patients were analyzed for SNP rs12979860 of IL 28B gene. Nine patients (100%) had the CC haplotypes, and no cases of CT and TT haplotypes were detected (p<0.001). LF was measured by TE in 12 (70.6%) patients. The median of LF (Kpa) was 5.95 (IQR 4.78). In four patients (33.3%) were observed significant LF (F3–F4). In the univariate analysis, no significant differences in the median of LF (Kpa) of HIV patients with spontaneous clearance of HCV were observed with respect to the coinfected HIV-HCV patients with SVR to antiviral therapy (N=34; median 9.6 Kpa; IQR: 10.7; p=0.92) or the coinfected HIV-HCV group who did not receive antiviral therapy (N=124; median 8.5 kPa; IQR: 7.65; p=0.85).ConclusionsSpontaneous clearance of HCV in our series of patients coinfected with HIV infection represents an uncommon clinical phenomenon. The immune status was preserved and most patients had HIV virological suppression. In all patients in which the IL 28B genetic polymorphism was determined, CC haplotypes were found. The degree of LF (Kpa) in this population was low (<9.5 Kpa) and a low proportion of subjects showed significant LF (F3–F4). No differences in the degree of LF were found in this group compared to coinfected patients receiving HCV treatment with SVR and compared to untreated patients coinfected with HIV-HCV.

Purpose of the study To know the different reasons why we decide not to treat or to delay the antiviral treatment against HCV in HIV coinfected patients. Methods Prospective cohort of HIV and HCV coinfected patients, followed in the Infectious Diseases Department of the Santa Lucia Universitary Hospital (Cartagena, Spain) between 1/12/2011 and 28/02/2012 in which we made transitory elastography. We evaluated the main reasons that moved us to decide not to treat or to delay the antiviral treatment against HCV: social‐familiar‐laboral reasons; neuro‐psychiatric severe diseases; patient decision; low grade hepatic fibrosis; previous failure to pegylated interferon (IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) in no‐1 genotype patients; delay in the approval of the triple therapy with INF‐RBV and a protease inhibitor (boceprevir or telaprevir) by the Regional Sanitary Authority; active alcohol abuse; active diseases that contraindicate the antiviral treatment, incomplete study of HCV (VL of HCV, genotype, ILB28, abdominal ecography); previous intolerance against IFN‐RBV and severe thrombocytopenia (<50×109/L). Summary of results The cohort included 109 patients, being 27 of them females (25%) and 82 males (75%), with a median of age of 45.8 years (SD: 6.2). In 98 patients (90%) we decided not to treat or to delay the antiviral treatment against HCV for one or more of the following reasons: 37 (34%) presented low grade hepatic fibrosis (<9.5 kpascal or F0‐F2); 19 (17%) had neuro‐psychiatric diseases; 18 (16.5%) were waiting for the approval of triple therapy by the Regional Sanitary Authority; 10 (9.2%) did not want to be treated; 10 (9.2%) had failure to IFN‐RBV in no‐1 genotype; 6 (5.5%) had social‐familiar‐laboral reasons; 6 (5.5%) presented active severe diseases; 4 (3.7%) were waiting to complete HCV study; 3 (2.8%) presented active alcohol abuse; 3 (2.8%) had previous intolerance against IFN‐RBV treatment and 2 (2%) had severe thrombocytopenia. Conclusions In our cohort of HIV‐HCV coinfected patients it was decided to delay or not to treat chronic hepatitis C in a significant proportion of subjects. The low grade of hepatic fibrosis measured with transitory elastography was the main reason for delaying the HCV antiviral treatment. The neuro‐psychiatric disease was the main clinical reason to not treat HCV. The delay of the approval of triple therapy treatment by the Regional Sanitary Authority was the most relevant non‐ clinical reason in our prospective study.