Objective: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of metformin, rosiglitazone and gliclazide MR as monotherapy and in combination in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Subjects and methods: 250 patients treated with oral antidiabetic agents for at least 24 weeks in monotherapy or in combination therapy were included in this retrospective study. Results: As monotherapy the reduction of fasting plasma glucose (FPG), postprandial glycemia (PPG) and HbA1c was similar with the three drugs after 24 weeks. Among patients on combination therapy, the reduction in HbA1c, FPG and PPG was significantly lower with rosiglitazone plus metformin, as compared to metformin plus gliclazide MR or gliclazide MR plus rosiglitazone. Patients treated with rosiglitazone achieved less favorable changes in lipid profile. Conclusion: In monotherapy all drugs were equally effective in improving glycemic control, whereas the combination of metformin plus gliclazide MR provided the best results concerning the improvement of both, glycemic control and lipid profile. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab. 2010;54(3):311-8 Keywords Metformin; glicazide MR; rosiglitazone RESUMO Objetivo: Comparar a eficácia e a tolerabilidade da metformina, rosiglitazona e gliclazida MR em monoterapia ou em combinação no tratamento do diabetes tipo 2. Sujeitos e métodos: 250 pacientes tratados com antidiabéticos orais por pelo menos 24 semanas, em monoterapia ou em terapia combinada, foram incluídos neste estudo retrospectivo. Resultados: Como monoterapia, a redução da glicemia de jejum (GJ), glicemia pós-prandial (GPP) e HbA1c foi similar com as três drogas, após 24 semanas. Entre os pacientes em terapia combinada, a redução da HbA1c, GJ e GPP foi significativamente menor com rosiglitazona e metformina, em comparação com metformina e gliclazida MR ou gliclazida MR mais rosiglitazona. Os pacientes tratados com rosiglitazona obtiveram mudanças menos favoráveis no perfil lipídico. Conclusão: Em monoterapia todos os medicamentos foram igualmente eficazes na melhora do controle glicêmico, enquanto a combinação de metformina e gliclazida MR proporcionou os melhores resultados relativos à melhoria de ambos, controle glicêmico e perfil lipídico. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab. 2010;54(3):311-8
RESUMOMacroprolactinemia caracteriza-se pelo predomínio no soro de uma prolactina (PRL) de alto peso molecular e baixa atividade biológica que não requer tratamento. A prevalência de macroprolactinemia foi avaliada em 115 pacientes consecutivos com hiperprolactinemia. Entre eles, 19 (16,5%) tinham exclusivamente macroprolactinemia, 4 (3,5%) síndrome dos ovários policísticos, 7 (6,1%) acromegalia, 8 (6,9%) hiperprolactinemia idiopática, 10 (8,7%) hipotiroidismo primário, 14 (12,2%) adenomas clinicamente não-funcionantes, 20 (17,4%) hiperprolactinemia farmacológica e 33 (28,7%) prolactinomas. O diagnóstico de macroprolactinemia foi estabelecido pela obtenção de uma recuperação da PRL < 30% após tratamento do soro com polietilenoglicol. Dentre os 19 pacientes com macroprolactinemia isolada, 16 (84,2%) eram mulheres e 12 (63,2%) eram assintomáticos, enquanto 4 (21%) tinham oligomenorréia e 3 (15,8%), galactorréia. Em contraste, apenas 11,5% dos indivíduos com outras causas de hiperprolactinemia eram assintomáticos (p< 0,001). Os níveis de PRL nos casos de macroprolactinemia variaram de 45,1 a 404 ng/mL (média de 113,3 ± 94,5), mas em 15 (78,9%) foram < 100 ng/mL. Nossos achados demonstram que macroprolactinemia é uma condição freqüente e, assim, sugerimos que seja rotineiramente pesquisada em pacientes com hiperprolactinemia. Macroprolactinemia is characterized by the predominance in the serum of macroprolactin, a prolactin (PRL) with high molecular mass and low biological activity that does not need treatment. The prevalence of macroprolactinemia was evaluated in 115 consecutive patients with hyperprolactinemia. Among them, 19 (16.5%) had solely macroprolactinemia, 4 (3.5%) polycystic ovary syndrome, 7 (6.1%) acromegaly, 8 (6.9%) idiopathic hyperprolactinemia, 10 (8.6%) primary hypothyroidism, 14 (12.2%) clinically non-functioning pituitary adenomas, 20 (17.4%) druginduced hyperprolactinemia and 33 (28.7%) prolactinomas. The diagnosis of macroprolactinemia was established by the demonstration of a PRL recovery < 30% after treatment of sera with polyethylene glycol. Among the 19 patients with isolated macroprolactinemia, 16 (84.2%) were female and 12 (63.2%) were asymptomatic, while 4 (21%) presented with oligomenorrhea and 3 (15.8%) with galactorrhea. In contrast, only 11.5% of individuals with other causes of hyperprolactinemia were asymptomatic (p< 0.001). Prolactin levels in cases of macroprolactin ranged from 45.1 to 404 ng/mL (mean 113.3 ± 94.5) but in 15 (78.9%) were < 100 ng/mL. Our findings demonstrate that macroprolactinemia is a common condition and, therefore, we suggest that it should be routinely screened in patients with hyperprolactinemia.
We studied clinical and laboratorial features of 73 patients with endogenous Cushing's syndrome, subdivided as follows: 46 (63%) with Cushing's disease (CD), 21 (28.7%) with an adrenal tumor and 6 (8.2%) with ectopic ACTH secretion (EAS). The rate of typical manifestations of hypercortisolism was similar regardless its etiology. In 100% of cases of Cushing's syndrome we observed serum cortisol levels greater than 1.8 microg/dL in low-dose dexamethasone (DMS) suppression tests, as well as elevation of serum or salivary midnight cortisol. However, urinary free cortisol was normal in 11.5% of patients. ACTH levels were suppressed in patients with adrenal tumors, normal or high in CD and always high in EAS. In the 8-mg overnight DMS suppression test, serum cortisol suppression > 50% was observed in 78.2% of cases of CD and in 33.3% of subjects with EAS, while an 80% suppression was only seen in CD. After stimulation with CRH or DDAVP an ACTH increase > 35% occurred in 81% of individuals with CD and 16.6% of those with EAS, while an ACTH increase > 50 achieved 100% specificity. Moreover, the combination of serum cortisol suppression > 50% and an ACTH increase > 35% in both tests only occurred in Cushing's disease. Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging identified 100% of macroadenomas and 59.4% of microadenomas in patients with CD. Among 10 patients that underwent bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling, a central-to-peripheral ACTH gradient > 3 after CRH or DDAVP had 90% sensitivity and 100% specificity for Cushing's disease.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of adding vildagliptin to the treatment of patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treated with a combination of metformin and a sulphonylurea. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: 37 T2DM patients with HbA1c ranging from 7.7% to 12.4% (mean of 9.30 ± 1.38), despite the use of metformin in combination with a sulphonylurea, were additionally treated with vildagliptin (100 mg/day) for at least 6 months. RESULTS: During triple oral therapy (TOT) HbA1c levels < 7% were achieved in 11 patients (29.7%), whereas levels of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) < 120 mg/dL were observed in 12 patients (32.4%). Both findings were observed in 10 patients (27.0%). Compared to nonresponsive subjects, lower mean baseline HbA1c and FPG levels were seen in responsive patients, but the difference was only statistically significant for fasting plasma glucose (FPG). Moreover, there was considerable overlap between the two groups. CONLUSION: Our preliminary results suggest that TOT with metformin, a sulphonylurea and vildagliptin may be useful for some T2DM patients nonresponsive to combination therapy with metformin and sulphonylurea.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.