SignificanceThe outer membrane (OM) excludes antibiotics such as vancomycin that kill gram-positive bacteria, and so is a major contributor to multidrug resistance in gram-negative bacteria. Yet, the OM is readily bypassed by protein bacteriocins, which are toxins released by bacteria to kill their neighbors during competition for resources. Discovered over 60 y ago, it has been a mystery how these proteins cross the OM to deliver their toxic payload. We have discovered how the bacteriocin pyocin S2 (pyoS2), which degrades DNA, enters Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells. PyoS2 tricks the iron transporter FpvAI into transporting it across the OM by a process that is remarkably similar to that used by its endogenous ligand, the siderophore ferripyoverdine.
Polypyrimidine tract binding (PTB) protein is an abundant and widely expressed RNA binding protein with four RNA Recognition Motif (RRM) domains. PTB is involved in numerous post-transcriptional steps in gene expression in both the nucleus and cytoplasm, but has been bestcharacterized as a regulatory repressor of some alternative splicing events (ASEs), and as an activator of translation driven by internal ribosome entry segments (IRESs). We have used a variety of approaches to characterize the activities of PTB and its molecular interactions with RNA substrates and protein partners. Using splice-sensitive microarrays we found that PTB acts not only as a splicing repressor but also as an activator, and that these two activities are determined by the location at which PTB binds relative to target exons. We have identified minimal splicing repressor and activator domains, and have determined high resolution structures of the second RRM domain of PTB binding to peptide motifs from the co-repressor protein Raver1. Using single-molecule techniques we have determined the stoichiometry of PTB binding to a regulated splicing substrate in whole nuclear extracts. Finally, we have used tethered hydroxyl radical probing to determine the locations on viral IRESs at which each of the four RRM domains bind. We are now combining tethered probing with single molecule analyses to gain a detailed understanding of how PTB interacts with pre-mRNA substrates to effect either repression or activation of splicing. 3Polypyrimidine tract binding protein (PTB) is an abundant RNA binding protein of the hnRNP family, originally identified by its binding to the polypyrimidine tract at the 3´ splice site of mammalian introns [1, 2]. Structurally, PTB consists of four RNA Recognition Motif (RRM) domains [3], with three interdomain linkers and an N-terminal leader sequence containing nuclear localization and export signals (Fig. 1A). Early speculation that PTB was an essential pre-mRNA splicing factor was rapidly dispelled, and it was subsequently recognized as a repressive regulator of alternative splicing [4]. In vitro selection experiments showed that optimal binding substrates for PTB consisted of motifs such as UCUUC embedded within more extended pyrimidine-rich contexts [5, 6]. Such motifs were found in splicing silencer elements associated with many PTB repressed exons (Fig. 1B). PTB was also found to be involved in regulating numerous other post-transcriptional processes in both the nucleus and cytoplasm, including 3´-end processing, mRNA stability, internal ribosome entry segment (IRES) driven translation and mRNA localization [7]. Of these processes, most experimental attention has focused on the roles of PTB as a repressor of splicing and activator of IRESmediated translation initiation. Here we discuss a range of approaches that we have deployed recently to analyze the roles of PTB and its interactions with RNA targets and protein partners. PTB splicing mapsPTB has been investigated as a splicing repressor in numerous mod...
IRE1 transduces the unfolded protein response by splicing XBP1 through its C-terminal cytoplasmic kinase-RNase region. IRE1 autophosphorylation is coupled to RNase activity through formation of a back-to-back dimer, although the conservation of the underlying molecular mechanism is not clear from existing structures. We have crystallized human IRE1 in a back-to-back conformation only previously seen for the yeast homologue. In our structure the kinase domain appears primed for catalysis but the RNase domains are disengaged. Structure-function analysis reveals that IRE1 is autoinhibited through a Tyr-down mechanism related to that found in the unrelated Ser/Thr protein kinase Nek7. We have developed a compound that potently inhibits human IRE1 kinase activity while stimulating XBP1 splicing. A crystal structure of the inhibitor bound to IRE1 shows an increased ordering of the kinase activation loop. The structures of hIRE in apo and ligand-bound forms are consistent with a previously proposed model of IRE1 regulation in which formation of a back-to-back dimer coupled to adoption of a kinase-active conformation drive RNase activation. The structures provide opportunities for structure-guided design of IRE1 inhibitors.
Fibrosis is characterized by the excessive deposition of extracellular matrix and crosslinked proteins, in particular collagen and elastin, leading to tissue stiffening and disrupted organ function. Lysyl oxidases are key players during this process, as they initiate collagen crosslinking through the oxidation of the ε‐amino group of lysine or hydroxylysine on collagen side‐chains, which subsequently dimerize to form immature, or trimerize to form mature, collagen crosslinks. The role of LOXL2 in fibrosis and cancer is well documented, however the specific enzymatic function of LOXL2 and LOXL3 during disease is less clear. Herein, we describe the development of PXS‐5153A, a novel mechanism based, fast‐acting, dual LOXL2/LOXL3 inhibitor, which was used to interrogate the role of these enzymes in models of collagen crosslinking and fibrosis. PXS‐5153A dose‐dependently reduced LOXL2‐mediated collagen oxidation and collagen crosslinking in vitro. In two liver fibrosis models, carbon tetrachloride or streptozotocin/high fat diet‐induced, PXS‐5153A reduced disease severity and improved liver function by diminishing collagen content and collagen crosslinks. In myocardial infarction, PXS‐5153A improved cardiac output. Taken together these results demonstrate that, due to their crucial role in collagen crosslinking, inhibition of the enzymatic activities of LOXL2/LOXL3 represents an innovative therapeutic approach for the treatment of fibrosis.
How ultra-high-affinity protein–protein interactions retain high specificity is still poorly understood. The interaction between colicin DNase domains and their inhibitory immunity (Im) proteins is an ultra-high-affinity interaction that is essential for the neutralisation of endogenous DNase catalytic activity and for protection against exogenous DNase bacteriocins. The colicin DNase–Im interaction is a model system for the study of high-affinity protein–protein interactions. However, despite the fact that closely related colicin-like bacteriocins are widely produced by Gram-negative bacteria, this interaction has only been studied using colicins from Escherichia coli. In this work, we present the first crystal structures of two pyocin DNase–Im complexes from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, pyocin S2 DNase–ImS2 and pyocin AP41 DNase–ImAP41. These structures represent divergent DNase–Im subfamilies and are important in extending our understanding of protein–protein interactions for this important class of high-affinity protein complex. A key finding of this work is that mutations within the immunity protein binding energy hotspot, helix III, are tolerated by complementary substitutions at the DNase–Immunity protein binding interface. Im helix III is strictly conserved in colicins where an Asp forms polar interactions with the DNase backbone. ImAP41 contains an Asp-to-Gly substitution in helix III and our structures show the role of a co-evolved substitution where Pro in DNase loop 4 occupies the volume vacated and removes the unfulfilled hydrogen bond. We observe the co-evolved mutations in other DNase–Immunity pairs that appear to underpin the split of this family into two distinct groups.
SummaryThe polypyrimidine tract-binding protein (PTB) is an important regulator of alternative splicing. PTB-regulated splicing of α-tropomyosin is enhanced by Raver1, a protein with four PTB-Raver1 interacting motifs (PRIs) that bind to the helical face of the second RNA recognition motif (RRM2) in PTB. We present the crystal structures of RRM2 in complex with PRI3 and PRI4 from Raver1, which—along with structure-based mutagenesis—reveal the molecular basis of their differential binding. High-affinity binding by Raver1 PRI3 involves shape-matched apolar contacts complemented by specific hydrogen bonds, a new variant of an established mode of peptide-RRM interaction. Our results refine the sequence of the PRI motif and place important structural constraints on functional models of PTB-Raver1 interactions. Our analysis indicates that the observed Raver1-PTB interaction is a general mode of binding that applies to Raver1 complexes with PTB paralogues such as nPTB and to complexes of Raver2 with PTB.
Aurora-A differs from Aurora-B/C at three positions in the ATP-binding pocket (L215, T217, and R220). Exploiting these differences, crystal structures of ligand–Aurora protein interactions formed the basis of a design principle for imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine-derived Aurora-A-selective inhibitors. Guided by a computational modeling approach, appropriate C7-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine derivatization led to the discovery of highly selective inhibitors, such as compound 28c, of Aurora-A over Aurora-B. In HCT116 human colon carcinoma cells, 28c and 40f inhibited the Aurora-A L215R and R220K mutants with IC50 values similar to those seen for the Aurora-A wild type. However, the Aurora-A T217E mutant was significantly less sensitive to inhibition by 28c and 40f compared to the Aurora-A wild type, suggesting that the T217 residue plays a critical role in governing the observed isoform selectivity for Aurora-A inhibition. These compounds are useful small-molecule chemical tools to further explore the function of Aurora-A in cells.
PURPOSE To investigate the cellular effects of mitomycin C (MMC) treatment on corneal endothelial (CE) cells at clinically relevant applications and dosages. METHODS Radial and posterior diffusion of MMC was determined by an Escherichia coli growth inhibition bioassay. A modified version of the comet assay (single cell gel electrophoresis) was used to detect DNA cross-linking. Immunostaining detected the nuclear phosphorylated histone variant H2AX (γ-H2AX) indicating DNA double-strand breaks. Apoptosis in MMC-treated cells was detected with annexin V staining. RESULTS Topical application of 0.02% MMC to intact goat globes resulted in MMC in the CE at 0.37 µg/mL and produced a significant increase in CE DNA cross-linking with as little as 6 seconds of topical MMC treatment. DNA cross-linking was also demonstrated in cultured CE cells by using MMC exposures similar to those detected in CE of intact eyes. Such MMC treatment of CE produced elevated and persistent γ-H2AX-positive cells indicative of DNA double-strand breaks. Similarly, there was an increase in the proportion of apoptotic CE cells, evidenced by positive annexin V staining. CONCLUSIONS The results demonstrate that exposure to MMC at times and concentrations commonly used in refractive surgery produces cross-linking of corneal endothelial DNA, persistent DNA damage, and endothelial death via apoptosis. Current practices of MMC application during refractive surgeries may increase the potential for long-term and permanent deleterious effects on the health of the corneal endothelium.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.