Monocytic cells exhibit a high level of heterogeneity and have two distinct modes of their activation: 1) classical M1 path associated with inflammation and tissue damage, and 2) alternative M2 path. Although it has been demonstrated that M2 macrophages play an important role in the regulation of the allergic immune responses, tissue maintenance and repair, little is known about the mechanisms that determine the M2 phenotype. We have previously shown that miR-124 is expressed in microglia that exhibit the M2 phenotype and overexpression of miR-124 in macrophages resulted in downregulation of a number of M1 markers (MHC class II, CD86) and up-regulation of several M2 markers (Fizz1, Arg1). We further investigated whether the polarization of macrophages towards the M2 phenotype induced miR-124 expression. We found that exposure of cells to IL-4 and IL-13 resulted in the upregulation of miR-124 in macrophages. We also demonstrated that IL-4 induced expression of three miR-124 precursor transcripts with predominant expression of pri-miR-124.3, suggesting regulation of miR-124 expression by IL-4 on a transcriptional level. Expression of miR-124 in microglia did not depend on IL-4 and/or IL-13, whereas expression of miR-124 in lung resident macrophages was IL-4 and IL-13-dependent and was upregulated by systemic administration of IL-4 or during allergic inflammation. Upregulation of several M2 markers (CD206, Ym1) and downregulation of the M1 markers (CD86, iNOS, TNF) in M2-polarized macrophages was abrogated by a miR-124 inhibitor, suggesting that this microRNA contributed to the M2 phenotype development and maintenance. Finally we showed that human CD14+CD16+ intermediate monocytes, which are found in increased numbers in patients with allergies and bronchial asthma, expressed high levels of miR-124 and exhibited other properties of M2-like cells. Thus, our study suggests that miR-124 serves as a regulator of the M2 polarization in various subsets of monocytic cells both in vitro and in vivo.

Rationale Platelets are known to participate in vascular pathologies; however, their role in neuroinflammatory diseases such as multiples sclerosis (MS) is unknown. Autoimmune CD4 T cells have been the main focus of studies of MS, although the factors that regulate T cell differentiation towards pathogenic Th1/Th17 phenotypes are not completely understood. Objectives We investigated the role of platelets in the modulation of CD4 T cell functions in MS patients and in mice with experimental autoimmune encephalitis (EAE), an animal model for MS. Methods and Results We found that early in MS and EAE platelets degranulated and produced a number of soluble factors serotonin (5HT), PF4 and PAF, which specifically stimulated differentiation of T cells towards pathogenic Th1, Th17 and IFN-γ/IL-17-producing CD4 T cells. At the later stages of MS and EAE platelets became exhausted in their ability to produce proinflammatory factors and stimulate CD4 T cells, but substantially increased their ability to form aggregates with CD4 T cells. Formation of platelet-CD4 T cell aggregates involved interaction of CD62P on activated platelets with adhesion molecule CD166 on activated CD4 T cells, contributing to downmodulation of CD4 T cell activation, proliferation and production of IFN-γ. Blocking of formation of platelet-CD4 T cell aggregates during progression of EAE substantially enhanced proliferation of CD4 T cell in the CNS and the periphery leading to exacerbation of the disease. Conclusion Our study indicates differential roles for platelets in the regulation of functions of pathogenic CD4 T cells during initiation and progression of CNS autoimmune inflammation.

The process of macrophage polarization is involved in many pathologies such as anti-cancer immunity and autoimmune diseases. Polarized macrophages exhibit various levels of plasticity when M2/M(IL-4) macrophages are reprogrammed into an M1-like phenotype following treatment with IFNγ and/or LPS. At the same time, M1 macrophages are resistant to reprogramming in the presence of M2-like stimuli. The molecular mechanisms responsible for the macrophages polarization, plasticity of M2 macrophages, and lack of plasticity in M1 macrophages remain unknown. Here, we explored the role of Egr2 in the induction and maintenance of macrophage M1 and M2 polarization in the mouse in vitro and in vivo models of inflammation. Egr2 knockdown with siRNA treatment fail to upregulate either M1 or M2 markers upon stimulation, and the overexpression of Egr2 potentiated M1 or M2 marker expression following polarization. Polarisation with M2-like stimuli (IL-4 or IL-13) results in increased Egr2 expression, but macrophages stimulated with M1-like stimuli (IFNγ, LPS, IL-6, or TNF) exhibit a decrease in Egr2 expression. Egr2 was critical for the expression of transcription factors CEBPβ and PPARγ in M2 macrophages, and CEBPβ was highly expressed in M1-polarized macrophages. In siRNA knockdown studies the transcription factor CEBPβ was found to negatively regulate Egr2 expression and is likely to be responsible for the maintenance of the M1-like phenotype and lack plasticity. During thioglycolate-induced peritonitis, adoptively transferred macrophages with Egr2 knockdown failed to become activated as determined by upregulation of MHC class II and CD86. Thus, our study indicates that Egr2 expression is associated with the ability of unstimulated or M2 macrophages to respond to stimulation with inflammatory stimuli, while low levels of Egr2 expression is associated with non-responsiveness of macrophages to their activation.