The presence of antibiotics in animal manure represents a significant concern with respect to the introduction of antibiotic residues to the environment and the development of antibiotic-resistant pathogens. In this review, we have (1) compiled reported detections of antibiotics in poultry litter, swine manure, and cattle manure; and (2) discussed the treatment of antibiotics during conventional agricultural waste management practices. The most reported antibiotics in animal manure were fluoroquinolones, sulfonamides, and tetracyclines, all of which the World Health Organization has listed as critically important for human health. Relatively high treatment efficiencies were observed for antibiotics in composting, anaerobic digestion, and aerobic/anaerobic lagooning. Interestingly, active management of compost piles did not demonstrate a significant increase in antibiotic degradation; however, low-and high-intensity compost systems exhibited high treatment efficiencies for most antibiotics. Anaerobic digestion was not effective for some key antibiotics, including lincosamides and select sulfonamides and fluoroquinolones. Given the potential for energy recovery during anaerobic digestion of agricultural waste, efforts to optimize antibiotic degradation represent an important area for future research. Lagoons also exhibited fairly high levels of antibiotic treatment, especially for aerobic systems; however, the operational costs/complexity of these systems inhibit utilization at the fullscale. No overall trends in antibiotic treatment efficiency during these three agricultural waste management practices were observed. Finally, we posit that increased efforts to include analysis of antibiotic residues in animal manure in national surveillance programs will provide important information to address concerns over the continued use of antimicrobials in animal feeding operations.

No abstract

No abstract

Due to a production error made after proofing, several of the in-text references are incorrect. All references to Loftin et al. [44] should be references to Kolz et al., with the exception of the third reference to Loftin et al. on page 13 of the article: BLoftin et al. [44] found that chlortetracycline...^. The full missing reference is: