The pioneer transcription factor (TF) PU.1 controls hematopoietic cell fate by decompacting stem cell heterochromatin and allowing nonpioneer TFs to enter otherwise inaccessible genomic sites. PU.1 deficiency fatally arrests lymphopoiesis and myelopoiesis in mice, but human congenital PU.1 disorders have not previously been described. We studied six unrelated agammaglobulinemic patients, each harboring a heterozygous mutation (four de novo, two unphased) of SPI1, the gene encoding PU.1. Affected patients lacked circulating B cells and possessed few conventional dendritic cells. Introducing disease-similar SPI1 mutations into human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells impaired early in vitro B cell and myeloid cell differentiation. Patient SPI1 mutations encoded destabilized PU.1 proteins unable to nuclear localize or bind target DNA. In PU.1-haploinsufficient pro–B cell lines, euchromatin was less accessible to nonpioneer TFs critical for B cell development, and gene expression patterns associated with the pro– to pre–B cell transition were undermined. Our findings molecularly describe a novel form of agammaglobulinemia and underscore PU.1’s critical, dose-dependent role as a hematopoietic euchromatin gatekeeper.

Somatic mutations in DNA‐binding sites for CCCTC‐binding factor (CTCF) are significantly elevated in many cancers. Prior analysis has suggested that elevated mutation rates at CTCF‐binding sites in skin cancers are a consequence of the CTCF‐cohesin complex inhibiting repair of UV damage. Here, we show that CTCF binding modulates the formation of UV damage to induce mutation hot spots. Analysis of genome‐wide CPD‐seq data in UV‐irradiated human cells indicates that formation of UV‐induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) is primarily suppressed by CTCF binding but elevated at specific locations within the CTCF motif. Locations of CPD hot spots in the CTCF‐binding motif coincide with mutation hot spots in melanoma. A similar pattern of damage formation is observed at CTCF‐binding sites in vitro, indicating that UV damage modulation is a direct consequence of CTCF binding. We show that CTCF interacts with binding sites containing UV damage and inhibits repair by a model repair enzyme in vitro. Structural analysis and molecular dynamic simulations reveal the molecular mechanism for how CTCF binding modulates CPD formation.

Transcription factors comprise a major reservoir of conformational disorder in the eukaryotic proteome. The hematopoietic master regulator PU.1 presents a well-defined model of the most common configuration of intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) in transcription factors. We report that the structured DNA binding domain (DBD) of PU.1 regulates gene expression via antagonistic dimeric states that are reciprocally controlled by cognate DNA on the one hand and by its proximal anionic IDR on the other. The two conformers are mediated by distinct regions of the DBD without structured contributions from the tethered IDRs. Unlike DNA-bound complexes, the unbound dimer is markedly destabilized. Dimerization without DNA is promoted by progressive phosphomimetic substitutions of IDR residues that are phosphorylated in immune activation and stimulated by anionic crowding agents. These results suggest a previously unidentified, nonstructural role for charged IDRs in conformational control by mitigating electrostatic penalties that would mask the interactions of highly cationic DBDs.

Hydration of interfaces is a major determinant of target specificity in protein/DNA interactions. Interfacial hydration is a highly variable feature in DNA recognition by ETS transcription factors and functionally relates to cellular responses to osmotic stress. To understand how hydration is mediated in the conserved ETS/DNA binding interface, secondary structures comprising the DNA contact surface of the strongly hydrated ETS member PU.1 were substituted, one at a time, with corresponding elements from its sparsely hydrated relative Ets-1. The resultant PU.1/Ets-1 chimeras exhibited variably reduced sensitivity to osmotic pressure, indicative of a distributed pattern of interfacial hydration in wildt-ype PU.1. With the exception of the recognition helix H3, the chimeras retained substantially high affinities. Ets-1 residues could therefore offset the loss of favorable hydration contributions in PU.1 via low-water interactions, but at the cost of decreased selectivity at base positions flanking the 5′-GGA-3′ core consensus. Substitutions within H3 alone, which contacts the core consensus, impaired binding affinity and PU.1 transactivation in accordance with the evolutionary separation of the chimeric residues involved. The combined biophysical, bioinformatics and functional data therefore supports hydration as an evolved specificity determinant that endows PU.1 with more stringent sequence selection over its ancestral relative Ets-1.

No abstract