BackgroundCancer patients of reproductive age are at risk of infertility as a result of their treatment. Oncofertility decision support resources can assist patients with fertility decision-making before treatment yet available oncofertility resources contain varying levels of detail and different fertility options. The key information/sections needed in oncofertility resources remain unclear. To explore the information needs for oncofertility decision-making before cancer treatment, we aimed to evaluate existing oncofertility decision support resources with breast cancer patients and providers.MethodsWe conducted 30 to 90-min interviews that included a survey questionnaire and open-ended questions with patients and providers between March and June 2016. Interviews were transcribed verbatim. Analysis involved descriptive statistics for survey responses and thematic analysis of qualitative data.ResultsA total of 16 participants completed interviews. Key information perceived by most participants as necessary for fertility decision-making included tailored post-treatment pregnancy rates, cost ranges and financial assistance for the fertility options based on patients’ situation. However, patient and provider participants expressed differing opinions on the inclusion of all before and after treatment fertility options and the amount of fertility information required at diagnosis.ConclusionThe evaluation identified fertility information needs among patients in addition to providers’ views on patient needs. While existing oncofertility resources contain information perceived as necessary for decision-making there is an opportunity to use these findings to create or enhance resources to better meet the needs of patients. Additionally, patients and providers differing views on information needs highlight the opportunity for provider training to ensure better communication using resources in clinic to understand specific patient needs.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-3901-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
BackgroundCollecting patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) via computer-based electronic data capture system may improve feasibility and facilitate implementation in clinical care. We report our initial experience about the acceptability of touch-screen tablet computer-based, self-administered questionnaires among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), including stage 5 CKD treated with renal replacement therapies (RRT) (either dialysis or transplant).MethodsWe enrolled a convenience sample of patients with stage 4 and 5 CKD (including patients on dialysis or after kidney transplant) in a single-centre, cross-sectional pilot study. Participants completed validated questionnaires programmed on an electronic data capture system (DADOS, Techna Inc., Toronto) on tablet computers. The primary objective was to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of using tablet-based electronic data capture in patients with CKD. Descriptive statistics, Fischer’s exact test and multivariable logistic regression models were used for data analysis.ResultsOne hundred and twenty one patients (55% male, mean age (± SD) of 58 (±14) years, 49% Caucasian) participated in the study. Ninety-two percent of the respondents indicated that the computer tablet was acceptable and 79% of the participants required no or minimal help for completing the questionnaires. Acceptance of tablets was lower among patients 70 years or older (75% vs. 95%; p = 0.011) and with little previous computer experience (81% vs. 96%; p = 0.05). Furthermore, a greater level of assistance was more frequently required by patients who were older (45% vs. 15%; p = 0.009), had lower level of education (33% vs. 14%; p = 0.027), low health literacy (79% vs. 12%; p = 0.027), and little previous experience with computers (52% vs. 10%; p = 0.027).ConclusionsTablet computer-based electronic data capture to administer PROMs was acceptable and feasible for most respondents and could therefore be used to systematically assess PROMs among patients with CKD. Special consideration should focus on elderly patients with little previous computer experience, since they may require more assistance with completion.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12882-017-0771-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
108 Background: Young breast cancer patients are at risk of temporary or permanent infertility following the administration of gonadotoxic cancer treatments. Currently patients do not feel they receive enough information to make informed fertility decisions before treatment. We aim to determine the fertility-related information health care providers and breast cancer survivors consider valuable to include in a Canadian decision aid (Can-DA) for young breast cancer patients by reviewing existing decision support resources. Methods: A qualitative descriptive approach was used to evaluate 6 decision support resources created in other jurisdictions. Using purposeful sampling, 8 multi-disciplinary health care providers and 8 breast cancer survivors from across Canada evaluated 1 to 2 decision support resources in structured interviews. Interviews were conducted in-person and by telephone from March to June 2016 and ranged in length from 30 to 90 minutes. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, organized in NVivo, and analyzed deductively using the pre-defined sections of the interview guide as a framework. Results: Each decision support resource had valuable components to adapt for the Can-DA. Participants valued the inclusion of Canadian-specific and accurate information on resources for additional support and the success rates and cost ranges of fertility preservation procedures. There were mixed views on the impact and value of including in-depth fertility information such as adoption and other fertility-related options after treatment. Discrepancies were also seen on the value of personal stories and an explicit values clarification exercise. There was consensus on the inclusion of only pertinent fertility-related information that does not replicate information in supplementary patient education material to avoid overwhelming patients. Conclusions: The evaluation provided valuable insight on the information and design features to consider for the Can-DA. Findings will be used in combination with the International Patient Decision Aid Standards criteria to ensure the Can-DA meets the fertility information needs of young breast cancer patients in Canada.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.