Transgender populations experience mental and physical health disparities compared to nontransgender populations, including nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI). Guided by the minority stress theory and Nock's model of NSSI, this study explored perspectives of transmasculine spectrum people (i.e., people with a gender identity that is man, male, transgender man, genderqueer, or nonbinary and who were assigned female at birth) who engage in NSSI. Qualitative interviews were conducted with transmasculine spectrum people ( = 18) who reported a history of NSSI. Their mean age was 24.9 years old ( = 5.43, range = 17-38). Participants reported that NSSI was influenced by a variety of factors including stress from gender nonconformity in childhood and adolescence. Stigma related to minority status and identity as well as proximal minority stress processes of concealment and expectations of rejection were identified as contributing to NSSI. Transgender identity development tasks such as coming out and identity exploration also appeared to affect NSSI. Finding a community of peers who engage in NSSI was helpful in mitigating social isolation, but at times reinforced NSSI. We discuss clinical implications at the individual and family levels. Interventions to reduce NSSI among transmasculine-spectrum people should include facilitating connections with gender minority peers and providing individual support and family interventions to facilitate transgender identity development. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
OBJECTIVE: Telehealth offers a solution to many challenges in health care, including the shortage of psychiatric providers. Recently the need to limit patient and provider exposure to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has escalated implementation of telehealth across the globe. As telehealth utilization expands, its role in nursing education and training requires systematic evaluation. Since publication of the National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculty white paper supporting telehealth in health care delivery and nurse practitioner education, several studies have demonstrated successful didactic instruction and training in telehealth. However, a recent literature review found no studies evaluating the use of telehealth technology as a means of precepting in clinical training. METHODS: This small-scale qualitative study investigates the readiness of one behavioral health clinic to provide teleprecepting to psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner students. Two preceptors and one student were interviewed using a peer-reviewed semistructured interview guide using video chat. Responses were reviewed, coded, and categorized into themes. RESULTS: Thematic analysis of the interviews revealed three categories for consideration in establishing teleprecepting. Clinical factors, logistics, and comparison with traditional precepting are discussed. Interviewees viewed teleprecepting as a viable method of increasing access to clinical training. CONCLUSIONS: This project supports teleprecepting as a feasible strategy for improving access to clinical training and as a technological resource that merits systematic evaluation. Practice guidelines are needed for teleprecepting of advanced practice registered nurse students, and both preceptors and students may benefit from training to support best practices prior to implementation.
With up to 70% of primary care visits prompted by psychosocial concerns, busy primary care clinics are increasingly addressing complex behavioral health (BH) needs. Substantial evidence demonstrates that the integration of BH into primary care improves access and outcomes, yet clinics face significant challenges in real-world implementation. This collaborative care integration project used psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner faculty as integration and BH specialists at an urban primary care clinic serving a diverse and largely indigent population. The project weathered leadership changes, information system shortcomings, and a shift to telehealth during coronavirus disease 2019. The initial outcomes include increased levels of integration and improved depression and diabetes metrics.
Hip fracture is a common injury in older adults that causes significant morbidity and mortality. Older adults who sustain a hip fracture are at a higher risk of institutionalisation, reduced mobility and subsequent falls and, consequently, have increased rates of morbidity and mortality. Quality improvement strategies that address gaps in hip fracture care are needed to ensure best practice and improve health outcomes for older adults. This case study describes the development of a state-based hip fracture registry and incentive payment scheme in Western Australia (WA), which were designed to drive quality improvement. The registry monitored best practice in hip fracture care criteria across three tertiary hospitals in WA, and the incentive program provided premium payments to these hospitals for meeting six criteria in best practice clinical quality. The fracture registry commenced in 2011, and by 2014 all participating hospitals were eligible for payments. From 2014 to 2016, the proportion of patients who were operated on within 36 hours increased from 60% to 79%. This case study illustrates how a hip fracture registry in conjunction with small premium payments improved well-described process measures in hip fracture care. What is known about the topic?Hip fracture is a common among older adults, usually resulting from a fall. International clinical quality registries have been shown to help drive quality improvements in patient care processes and outcomes. What does this paper add?This paper adds an Australian perspective to the existing literature on the efficacy of hip fracture clinical quality registries. It offers an example of how a Western Australian hip fracture registry with an associated incentive payment program drove clinical care and process change to improve care provision and patient outcomes. What are the implications for practitioners?This case study suggests regular monitoring and reporting on hip fracture care processes and patient outcomes can lead to improvements in both of these measures. Because incentive payments may have contributed to the best practice improvements noted in this case study, practitioners involved in designing future monitoring and reporting programs should consider the merits of incorporating financial incentives.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.