Abstract-Considering transtibial amputation (TTA) rehabilitation costs and complexity, high-quality literature should inform clinical practice. Systematic reviews (SRs) suggest this is not the case. This article's purpose was to review the highest-quality evidence available to guide clinical practice for TTA regarding five prosthetic intervention areas. Six databases were searched for high-quality SRs and prospective clinical trials (randomized clinical trials [RCTs]). Reviewers screened, sorted, rated (i.e., methodologic quality, bias risk), and extracted article data. Meta-analyses were conducted when possible. Thirty-one references were included (25 RCTs and 6 SRs). Five topical areas emerged (alignment, feet and ankles, interface, postoperative care, pylons). Twenty-three evidence statements were supported by level 2 evidence and eight by level 1 evidence. All RCTs reported randomization and reasonable data presentation. Concealed allocation and blinding were not widely used. Mean attrition was 11%. SRs included no meta-analyses. Functional level was poorly reported. Grouping feet and ankle components by functional classification enabled meta-analyses, though variance was considerable given the small sample sizes. Prosthetic interventions are generally safe for TTAs. High-quality literature enabled formulation of evidence statements to support select clinical practice areas, though quantity was lacking. Thus, numerous topics related to TTA care lack rigorous evidence. Although blinding in prosthetic research requires increased funding and effort, it could greatly improve the methodologic quality of prosthetic research.Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval, ESAR = energy storing and release, EWA = early walking aid, FK = flexible keel, GRF = ground reaction force, MA = multi-axial, NIH = National Institutes of Health, PEDro = Physiotherapy Evidence Database Scale, PTB = patella tendon bearing, RRD = rigid removable dressing, SA = single axis, SACH = solid ankle cushion heel, SIGN = Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, SR = systematic review, TSB = total surface bearing, TTA = transtibial amputation, VASS = vacuum-assisted suspension system, vGRF = vertical ground reaction force, VSP = vertical shock pylon.

No abstract

No abstract

Transtibial amputation (TTA) is life-altering emotionally, functionally, and economically. The economic impact to all stakeholders is largely unknown, as is the cost-effectiveness of prosthetic intervention. This scoping report’s purpose was to determine if there is sufficient evidence to conduct a formal systematic review or meta-analysis in any particular prosthetic intervention area and to determine if any evidence statements could be synthesized relative to economic evaluation of interventions provided to patients with TTA. The scoping review revealed six articles representing three topical areas of transtibial care: Care Models, Prosthetic Treatment, and Prosthetic Sockets. All six articles were cost-identification or cost-consequence design and included a total of 704 subjects. Presently, it can be concluded with moderate confidence that specific weight-bearing and total-contact sockets for transtibial amputees are functionally and economically equivalent in the short term when costs, delivery time, and all stakeholder perspectives are considered. Long-term socket outcomes are relatively unexplored. Further primary research is needed beyond this to determine cost-effectiveness for other areas of transtibial prosthetic care although clinical outcomes are somewhat established through systematic review and meta-analysis in other areas of care. Conversely, evaluation of narrative economic reports relative to transtibial care may be sufficient to warrant further analysis. Guidance from the profession may also be useful in devising a strategy for how to assure economic analyses are a routine element of future prosthetic science.

Limited information is available concerning stair descent training for transfemoral amputees using prosthetic knees. Literature describing stair descent training techniques are predominantly available for the step-to-step stair descent method. A thoroughly descriptive technique for training prosthetic knee users to reciprocally descend stairs, using a step-over-step pattern is not available. The purpose of this technical note is to describe a procedure for training stance-yielding prosthetic knee users how to descend stairs using a reciprocal, step-over-step pattern. The technique describes stair setup, safety considerations including hand railing, use of a gait belt, guarding techniques and a one versus two therapist technique. Nineteen subjects were initially trained in this technique, and all subjects demonstrated the ability to reciprocally descend stairs after training. Reciprocal step-over-step stair descent is not appropriate for all transfemoral amputees; however, we recommend considering the supervised, therapeutic application of this technique for all transfemoral amputees using stance yielding prosthetic knees. We suggest that practicing this technique might improve a prosthetic knee user's overall functional performance such as their ability to utilize stumble recovery during a missed step, to transition more symmetrically from stand to sit and to utilize knee flexion during the loading response of gait. (J Prosthet Orthot. 2012;24:10 -15.)