This study examines how the social sciences' debate between qualitative and quantitative methods is reflected in the citation patterns of sociology journal articles.Citation analysis revealed that quantitative articles were more likely to cite journal articles than monographs, while qualitative articles were more likely to cite monographs than journals. Quantitative articles cited other articles from their own quantitativedominated journals but virtually excluded citations to articles from qualitative journals, while qualitative articles cited articles from the quantitative-dominated journals as well as their own qualitative-specialized journals. Discussion and conclusions include this study's implications for library collection development.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract