We consider three "accepted truths" about iris biometrics, involving pupil dilation, contact lenses and template aging. We also consider a relatively ignored issue that may arise in system interoperability. Experimental results from our laboratory demonstrate that the three accepted truths are not entirely true, and also that interoperability can involve subtle performance degradation. All four of these problems affect primarily the stability of the match, or authentic, distribution of template comparison scores rather than the non-match, or imposter, distribution of scores. In this sense, these results confirm the security of iris biometrics in an identity verification scenario. We consider how these problems affect the usability and security of iris biometrics in large-scale applications, and suggest possible remedies.
Many iris recognition systems operate under the assumption that non-cosmetic contact lenses will not affect match quality and the convenience using iris biometrics. We show results opposing this belief with a study of 51 contact lens wearing subjects and 64 non contact lens wearing subjects. Our experimental results show that contacts lens wearers are 14 times more likely to be falsely rejected by the IrisBEE iris recognition system at a Hamming distance threshold of 0.32 than non contact lens wearers. We further classify contact lens wearers into four categories according to the type of lens and its visibility in the iris image. The false reject rate varies with different types of contacts and the artifacts they produce on iris images. This is the first work that we are aware of to look at the effects of prescription contact lenses on iris biometrics.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.