Based on the results of this study, morbidly obese patients may require higher TWD to obtain and maintain a therapeutic INR.

Objective: To review the literature and recommendations for nonselective β-blockers (NSBBs) in the setting of variceal bleeding prophylaxis and decompensated liver disease. Data Sources: Literature search of MEDLINE was performed (1988 to October 2019) using the following search terms: cirrhosis, advanced cirrhosis, β-blocker, decompensation, prophylaxis. Abstracts, peer-reviewed publications, clinical practice guidelines, and product monographs were reviewed. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Relevant English language studies and those conducted in humans were considered for analysis and inclusion. Data Synthesis: Evidence that suggests that NSBBs are harmful in advanced cirrhosis is overshadowed by confounding variables and small patient populations. The majority of the available evidence suggests neutral or beneficial effects on mortality with continuation of NSBBs despite liver disease progression. Based on the available literature, guidelines, and expert consensuses, NSBBs can be considered within this patient population and may have a positive impact on the majority of these patients. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: This review summarizes current place in therapy for NSBBs in the setting of cirrhosis and variceal bleeding prophylaxis. It also includes a discussion of the literature for use of NSBBs within the setting of different acute decompensations in which the data and recommendations for use are less clear. Conclusions: Recent evidence shows neutral or positive results for NSBB use in particular decompensation subgroups, which suggests that NSBBs can be used cautiously with close monitoring in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Questions still remain regarding optimal agent and dose and whether agents can be safely restarted after an acute decompensation episode.

Background: Little evidence exists for de-escalation of nosocomial pneumonia therapy without positive cultures. Objective: The purpose of this study was to identify potential predictors of treatment failure following de-escalation to a fluoroquinolone in culture-negative nosocomial pneumonia. Methods: The study involved a single-center, retrospective cohort of patients admitted with diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia and positive chest radiography who received at least 24 hours of fluoroquinolone monotherapy following at least 24 hours of appropriate empirical antibiotics. Treatment failure was defined using a composite of all-cause death within 30 days of discharge, treatment re-escalation, or readmission for pneumonia within 30 days of discharge. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze predictors of treatment failure. Duration of empirical antibiotics and significant univariable exploratory predictors were included in multivariable analysis. Results: Of 164 patients, 23 (14%) failed de-escalation. Duration of empirical antibiotics (68.5 ± 32.1 vs 65.8 ± 35 hours) was not associated with treatment failure in univariable (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 1.002 [95% CI = 0.991-1.013]) or multivariable analyses (HR = 1.003 [95% CI = 0.991-1.015]). Significant exploratory predictors on univariable analysis included active cancer, intensive care unit (ICU) admission at empirical initiation, APACHE II score, and steroid use ≥20-mg prednisone equivalent. ICU admission at empirical initiation (HR = 2.439 [95% CI = 1.048-5.676]) and steroid use ≥20-mg prednisone equivalent (HR = 2.946 [95% CI = 1.281-6.772]) were associated with treatment failure on multivariable analysis. Conclusion and Relevance: Duration of empirical antibiotics does not appear to influence failure of de-escalation to fluoroquinolone monotherapy in culture-negative nosocomial pneumonia.