Purpose This study aims to explain the value of using critical realist case research in supply chain management (SCM). While positivist case research focuses on generalizable law-like rules, and interpretivist research explores social meaning, critical realist case research seeks to make objective explanations that are bound by the case context. This study demonstrates how a critical realist synthesis of causal reasoning and contextual complexity allows for stronger theorizing in SCM. Design/methodology/approach This study highlights the possibilities of conducting critical realist case research in SCM by investigating philosophical perspectives in existing literature. Findings Based on existing literature, this study identifies which parts of contemporary SCM research will benefit from the critical realist perspective. This study also contends that supply chain scholars can use critical realist case research to develop new types of contextualized middle-range theories. Research limitations/implications This study proposes to complement the qualitative SCM toolbox with critical realist case research to further refine the development of novel theories. This will benefit not only researchers but also managers, as it opens the doors to new and inspiring research. Originality/value This study takes an important step toward establishing critical realist case studies as a key methodology in SCM. While other scholars have introduced critical realism as a paradigmatic approach in SCM, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first article that develops a qualitative critical realist case research approach.
Supply chain management (SCM) is undergoing significant development in aca-demia and business, but also in the daily lives of many. At the same time, the in-creased pressure on the supply chains is revealing inherent flaws in the global sys-tems of trade, as sustainability issues are arising. Thus, it seems more relevant now than ever to research SCM. A rethinking of SCM is necessary to understand and navigate the complexity of global supply chains. This paper-based dissertation pro-vides such a rethinking by combining political thinking with SCM, ultimately an-swering the question: How does understanding the political nature of SCM alter the way in which researchers investigate it and practitioners approach it? The five research chapters and the cape contribute to this rethinking in that various themes are explored using methods that are often used in political research. First, panarchy theory is explored, shedding light on supply chain complexity. Second, the political aspects of panarchy theory are investigated to provide reflections on social sustainability in SCM. Moving towards philosophy of science, the third re-search chapter deals with critical realism as a philosophy that can help us understand contemporary issues. Fourth, political mechanisms underlying the coffee supply chain are investigated. And finally, political philosophy is introduced to SCM in a novel thought experiment. To conclude, the implications for research and practice are discussed. For research, five prerequisites for political SCM are explored. These prerequisites are related to the key aspects of research: epistemology, ontology, axiology, theory, and methods. For practice, the social, environmental, and managerial implications are discussed. Ultimately, the conclusion is clear: SCM can be understood as a political activity, which calls for changes among researchers and practitioners.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.