Current treatments of neuropathic pain arising from conditions such as nerve injury/compression are only partially effective, and limited in their use by side-effects. p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) is involved in the regulation and synthesis of inflammatory mediators, and is the target for a novel class of cytokine-suppressive anti-inflammatory drugs. p38 inhibitors may reduce neuronal sensitisation in preclinical models of neuropathic pain, particularly where there is a substantial inflammatory component. An exploratory, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period, cross-over trial was undertaken to evaluate the effect of dilmapimod (SB-681323), a selective p38 MAPK inhibitor, on neuropathic pain symptoms and signs. Fifty patients with nerve trauma, radiculopathy or carpal tunnel syndrome were randomised; 43 patients completed the study. Eligible patients received oral dilmapimod and placebo twice daily for 2 weeks, with an intervening washout period of 2-4 weeks. Subjects attended weekly for efficacy and safety assessments, which included evaluation of daily and current pain intensity using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS), quantitative sensory testing, allodynia and global impression of change. There was a statistically significant reduction in the primary endpoint of average daily pain score during the second week of treatment among patients treated with dilmapimod (15 mg/day) compared to placebo using NRS [0.80; 95% CI (0.28, 1.33); p=0.0034]. A similar trend for effect was seen in some secondary endpoints. Dilmapimod was well tolerated, with no clinically relevant safety findings. p38 MAPK inhibitors merit further evaluation for neuropathic pain in larger clinical trials, particularly for clinically meaningful analgesic effect size.

Background: Two studies were undertaken to characterize the maximal effort inhalation profiles of healthy subjects and patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) through a moderate-resistance dry powder inhaler (DPI). Correlations between inhaler-specific inhalation characteristics and inhaler-independent lung function parameters were investigated.Methods: Healthy subjects (n = 15), patients with mild, moderate, or severe asthma (n = 45), and patients with mild, moderate, severe, or very-severe COPD (n = 60) were included in the studies. Inhalation pressure drop versus time profiles were recorded using an instrumented ELLIPTA® DPI or bespoke resistor component with equivalent resistivity. Inhaler-independent lung function assessments included pharyngometry, spirometry, plethysmography, and diffusion.Results: For the inhaler-specific inhalation profiles, the mean maximal effort peak inspiratory flow rates (PIFRs) varied across the subgroups from 65.8–110.6 L/min (range: 41.6–142.9). Peak pressure drop, PIFR, inhaled volume, and average inhalation flow rate (primary endpoints) did not differ markedly between healthy subjects and patients with asthma or mild COPD. Moderate, severe, and very-severe COPD patients demonstrated lower mean peak pressure drops, PIFRs and inhaled volumes, which tended to decrease with increasing COPD severity. Severe and very-severe COPD patients demonstrated shorter mean inhalation times compared with all other participants. Inhaler-independent lung function parameters were consistent with disease severity, and statistically significant (p < 0.05) strong correlations (R > 0.7) with components of the inhaler-specific inhalation profiles were observed in the COPD cohort; correlations in the asthma cohort tended to be weaker.Conclusions: All participants achieved a maximal effort PIFR ≥ 41.6 L/min through the moderate resistance of the ELLIPTA inhaler. Patients with asthma achieved similar inhalation profiles to healthy subjects, but increasing COPD severity tended to reduce a patient's inhalation capability. Correlation analyses suggest that some lung function parameters may be a useful indicator of ability to inhale efficiently through a moderate-resistance DPI, such as the ELLIPTA inhaler.

BackgroundFluticasone furoate/Vilanterol trifenatate (FF/VI) is an inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta-agonist combination with a prolonged bronchodilator duration of action. We characterised the time-course of onset and offset of airway anti-inflammatory action of FF/VI, as assessed by fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), and compared this to the bronchodilator duration of action.MethodsA single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period, crossover study was undertaken in 28 steroid-naïve adults with asthma. Participants with an FEV1 ≥ 60% predicted, reversible airway disease, and FeNO > 40 ppb received FF/VI 100/25 mcg or placebo once daily for 14 days. FeNO and peak expiratory flow were measured twice-daily during treatment and during a 21-day washout period. FEV1 was measured for five days from treatment cessation. The primary outcome measure was FeNO change from baseline ratio for 21 days following treatment cessation.ResultsIn the 27 subjects who completed the study, median (range) baseline FeNO was 87 ppb (42–212). FF/VI 100/25 mcg reduced FeNO by day 3, ratio FF/VI versus placebo 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.61–0.86) with the maximum reduction occurring at day 14, 0.32 (0.27–0.37). Following cessation of treatment FeNO remained suppressed for 18 days, ratio on day 18 0.77 (0.59–1.00), whereas improvements in FEV1 and peak flow were maintained for 3 to 4 days post-treatment.ConclusionsThe anti-inflammatory duration of action of FF/VI is consistent with the high glucocorticoid receptor affinity and long lung retention of fluticasone furoate. The anti-inflammatory effect of FF/VI was of greater duration than its bronchodilator effect in adults with mild asthma.Funding GlaxoSmithKline (201499).Trial registrationProspectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov registry number NCT02712047.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12931-018-0836-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Losmapimod could not be differentiated from placebo in terms of a primary analgesia response in patients with pain following peripheral nerve injury. The lack of response could reflect inadequate exposure at central sites of action or differences between rodent and human with respect to the target or neuropathic pain mechanisms.

Background Protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) is the primary enzyme responsible for symmetric arginine dimethylation of multiple proteins that impact cell proliferation. Its substrates include proteins involved in mRNA splicing, signal transduction, gene transcription, and DNA repair. PRMT5 overexpression occurs in many cancers and correlates with poor prognosis. GSK3326595 is a potent, specific, and reversible inhibitor of PRMT5 that inhibits proliferation and induces cell death in a broad range of solid and hematologic tumor cell lines. It also exhibits potent anti-tumor activity in vivo in animal models, including in preclinical models of myeloid malignancies. One mechanism of action of GSK3326595 is via inhibition of cellular mRNA splicing and upregulation of tumor suppressor function. Mutations in splicing factors are frequent in myeloid malignancies (including approximately 40% of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome [MDS], and over 60% of patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia [CMML]), and further inhibition of mRNA splicing via GSK3326595 may lead to a synthetic lethal phenotype specifically in splicing mutant disease. Study 208809 is the first trial of a PRMT5 inhibitor in participants with myeloid malignancies. Methods Study 208809 is a Phase I/II study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and clinical activity of GSK3326595 monotherapy in participants with relapsed and refractory MDS, CMML, and hypoproliferative acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that has evolved from an antecedent MDS. Part 1 will identify a tolerated dose and establish preliminary evidence of efficacy in this population. At the end of Part 1, if pre-specified criteria are met, then the study will be expanded with three additional Parts that will be opened in parallel. Part 2A is a Phase II randomized comparison of monotherapy GSK3326595 versus investigator's choice of best available care in participants with relapsed and refractory MDS, CMML, and hypoproliferative AML. Part 2B is a single-arm investigation of safety and efficacy of GSK3326595 plus 5-azacitidine in participants with newly diagnosed high-risk MDS. Part 2C is a single-arm investigation of the safety and efficacy of monotherapy GSK3326595 in participants with relapsed or refractory AML whose tumors harbor mutations in components of the pre-mRNA splicing machinery. All participants enrolled in this study have a diagnosis of MDS, CMML, or AML, with enrollment into each cohort as defined above. Participants are adults with adequate organ function as defined in the protocol. Prior allogeneic transplant is permitted. There are no required biomarkers for enrollment to Parts 1, 2A, and 2B, though central confirmation of pre-mRNA splicing factor mutations will be performed to stratify participants for overall analysis. Enrollment to Part 2C is limited to participants with splicing factor mutations. It is estimated that a maximum of 302 participants will be enrolled in the study, divided as follows: Approximately 41 participants in Part 1, approximately 192 participants in Part 2A, approximately 41 participants in Part 2B, and approximately 28 participants in Part 2C. In Part 1, the primary endpoint is clinical benefit rate, as defined as the percentage of participants achieving a complete remission, complete marrow remission, partial remission (PR), stable disease lasting at least 8 weeks, or hematologic improvement, as per standard criteria. In Part 2A, the primary endpoint is overall survival. In Part 2B and Part 2C, the primary endpoint is overall response rate (ORR), defined as the percentage of participants achieving a PR or better. Samples are collected to evaluate symmetric dimethylated arginine (SDMA), the enzymatic product of PRMT5. This has been demonstrated to be a pharmacodynamic marker of PRMT5 inhibition in plasma and tumor tissue. In addition, participants will be stratified based on the presence or absence of spliceosome mutations and analyzed separately to evaluate the effect of these mutations on clinical activity. As of 1 August 2019, recruitment is ongoing across six centers in the United States and Canada; ten participants have been enrolled, all into Part 1. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03614728 Study is funded by GlaxoSmithKline Disclosures Watts: Takeda: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Bradley:AbbVie: Other: Advisory Board. Brunner:Novartis: Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Forty Seven Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Minden:Trillium Therapetuics: Other: licensing agreement. Papadantonakis:Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria. Abedin:Actinium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pfizer Inc: Research Funding; Helsinn Healthcare: Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Baines:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Barbash:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Gorman:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kremer:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Borthakur:Cantargia AB: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Tetralogic Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Argenx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; FTC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BioTheryX: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Xbiotech USA: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Oncoceutics: Research Funding; Oncoceutics, Inc.: Research Funding; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; BioLine Rx: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Agensys: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Bayer Healthcare AG: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Eli Lilly and Co.: Research Funding; NKarta: Consultancy; Cyclacel: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Arvinas: Research Funding; Polaris: Research Funding; Strategia Therapeutics: Research Funding.