This experiment tested the ability of people to recall the locations of buildings in a familiar campus setting. Ten graduate students represented the relative locations of buildings by pairwise distance judgments (on a 100-point scale) and by direct mapping of locations on a Tektronix cathode ray terminal. As evaluated by Stevens's power law, both methods led to accurate judgments of relative distance (the average exponent was close to 1). In addition, the pairwise judgments were analyzed by multidimensional scaling (MDS) and the buildings were located in a two-dimensional map. When asked to choose between the MDS representation and the map created directly on the Tektronix, all 10 subjects chose the latter as the more accurate. Moreover, 6 out of 10 subjects thought the direct map was more accurate than the actual map of the building locations. These results suggest that either pairwise judgment or direct mapping yield accurate representations of spatial relations in a familiar environment, but that subjects favor the direct map.The ability to plan and execute movement in a familiar environment seems to require that one possess a cognitive representation of that environment in addition to the stimulus information directly available to the sensory systems. Such an assumption has always been of central importance in empiricist theories of perception (see Pastore, 1971), and laboratory tests over the past 30 years have provided strong support for this assumption in the cases of size, distance, and shape perception (e.g.,
Reaction time (RT) in simple categorization tasks was predicted to vary as a function of the relatedness among environmental items. Differences in RT were interpreted as reflecting differences in proximity or strength of associations in environmental memory. In Experiment 1, subjects sorted names offamiliar local buildings according to which seemed to go together. Hierarchical cluster analysis revealed major clusters whose members were related in function and, within these, smaller clusters of buildings related by spatial proximity. In Experiment 2, subjects responded "Yes" if two items on a trial were both local buildings and "No" if one item was local and one nonlocal. Subjects responded significantly faster to pairs taken from the cluster analysis that were related by both spatial proximity and function than they did to unrelated pairs or pairs related in function only. In Experiment 3, a free-associaton task identified related pairs of spatially proximate, functionally dissimilar environmental items. In Experiment 4, RTs to these pairs did not differ from RTs to pairs of spatially proximate, functionally dissimilar items or from RTs to pairs unrelated functionally and spatially. Spatial proximity and functional similarity together contribute to the organization in memory of buildings in the physical environment.
This experiment investigated people's preferences for the location of facilities in an ideal town. Ten graduate students represented the relative locations of facilities (such as home, school, factory) by two methods: (a) pairwise ideal distances on a 100-point scale and (b) direct planning of locations on a Tektronix cathode ray screen. The pairwise distances were analyzed by multidimensional scaling (MDS) and the facilities were thus situated in a two-dimensional space. Subjects then expressed a preference between the direct plan and the one created by MDS. In addition, the rank order priorities of the facilities were determined for each subject. The entire procedure was repeated after 4 mo. A common central plan was evident in all cases (and rank order priorities were stable), but there was within-subject variability in the plans for different methods and test occasions. Despite such variability, subjects generally preferred their direct plan over the one created by MDS (based on pair estimates). A second group of subjects showed equal preference (on the average) for both types of town representations created by the first group. Both the pair and direct technique seem appropriate for studying cognitive representations of a hypothetical environment. This is the third article of a three-part series. that is> both y i e id e d results that demon-Requests for reprints should be sent to
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.