Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (ceVUS) is a dynamic imaging technique that makes it possible to study the structure of the urinary tract after the administration of intravesical contrast material. Initially, ceVUS was indicated mainly to study vesicoureteral reflux (VUR); however, since the ability of ceVUS to depict the structure of the urethra was demonstrated in both sexes, ceVUS is now indicated for examination of the entire urinary tract. The main benefit of ceVUS is that it does not use ionizing radiation. In recent years, fundamental changes have occurred in the understanding of VUR. The lessening effect of VUR and the low rate of occurrence of urethral pathologic conditions have given rise to changes in the indications for tests for these conditions. In addition to being able to help confirm a diagnosis of VUR, the ceVUS technique can be used to depict obstructive and nonobstructive urethral pathologic conditions, as well as normal variants, on high-quality images. Furthermore, ceVUS enables real-time assessment of voiding function. For these reasons, ceVUS should be not only an alternative to voiding cystourethrography, but also the technique of choice for the study of the entire urinary tract in pediatric patients. Online supplemental material is available for this article. RSNA, 2017.
In genetically-modified Lmx1bf/f/p mice, selective deletion of LMX1B in Pet-1 expressing cells leads to failure of embryonic development of serotonin (5-HT) neurons. As adults, these mice have a decreased hypercapnic ventilatory response and abnormal thermoregulation. This mouse model has been valuable in defining the normal role of 5-HT neurons, but it is possible that developmental compensation reduces the severity of observed deficits. Here we studied mice genetically modified to express diphtheria toxin receptors (DTR) on Pet-1 expressing neurons (Pet-1-Cre/Floxed DTR or Pet1/DTR mice). These mice developed with a normal complement of 5-HT neurons. As adults, systemic treatment with 2 – 35 μg diphtheria toxin (DT) reduced the number of tryptophan hydroxylase immunoreactive (TpOH-ir) neurons in the raphe nuclei and ventrolateral medulla by 80%. There were no effects of DT on baseline ventilation (VE) or the ventilatory response to hypercapnia or hypoxia. At an ambient temperature (TA) of 24°C, all Pet1/DTR mice dropped their body temperature (TB) below 35°C after DT treatment, but the latency was shorter in males than females (3.0 ± 0.37 vs 4.57 ± 0.29 days, respectively; p < 0.001). One week after DT treatment, mice were challenged by dropping TA from 37°C to 24°C, which caused TB to decrease more in males than in females (29.7 ± 0.31°C vs 33.0 ± 1.3°C, p < 0.01). We conclude that the 20% of 5-HT neurons that remain after DT treatment in Pet1/DTR mice are sufficient to maintain normal baseline breathing and a normal response to CO2, while those affected include some essential for thermoregulation, in males more than females. In comparison to models with deficient embryonic development of 5-HT neurons, acute deletion of 5-HT neurons in adults leads to a greater defect in thermoregulation, suggesting that significant developmental compensation can occur.
Pregnant women with IDDM who have a positive test for TPO-Abs before gestation have poorer glucose control and a high prevalence of hypothyroidism. Therefore we recommend that prepregnant IDDM patients be screened for anti-TPO-Abs. Those with a positive result should be followed with serial monitoring of free T4 and TSH levels during each trimester as well as the postpartum period.
Background/Aim: Oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity (OIN) can be severe and dose-limiting with clinically significant symptoms that persist for years. Few published reports have described postoperative exacerbation of OIN and more longitudinal data are needed to better characterize the phenomenon. Patients and Methods: We identified 13 patients diagnosed with colon (n=7), rectal (n=4) or pancreatic (n=2) cancer who experienced postoperative OIN exacerbation at our medical center. Charts were reviewed for demographic and clinical data regarding OIN. Results: OIN exacerbation was documented 0.5-7.0 months after the first surgery following oxaliplatin exposure, with a median duration of 10.6 months (range=1.4-86.1 months). OIN exacerbation persisted in 3/13 patients at last follow-up, and improved to pre-operative levels in 6/13 patients (with complete resolution in 4/13) within a median of 3.6 months from initial exacerbation. Conclusion: Given the widespread use of oxaliplatin in neoadjuvant and first-line treatment for gastrointestinal cancers, further study is warranted to prospectively and systematically define risks for postoperative OIN exacerbation.
Organ donors are systematically screened for infection, whereas screening for malignancy is less rigorous. The true incidence of donor-transmitted malignancies is unknown due to a lack of universal tumor testing in the posttransplant setting. Donor-transmitted malignancy may occur even when not suspected based on donor or recipient factors, including age and time to cancer diagnosis. We describe the detection of a gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma transmitted from a young donor to 4 transplant recipients. Multidimensional histopathologic and genomic profiling showed a CDH1 mutation and MET amplification, consistent with gastric origin. At the time of writing, one patient in this series remains alive and without evidence of cancer after prompt organ explant after cancer was reported in other recipients. Because identification of a donor-derived malignancy changes management, our recommendation is to routinely perform short tandem repeat testing (or a comparable assay) immediately upon diagnosis of cancer in any organ transplant recipient. Routine testing for a donor-origin cancer and centralized reporting of outcomes are necessary to establish a robust evidence base for the future development of clinical practice guidelines.
414 Background: Donor-derived malignancy may occur even when not suspected based on donor or recipient factors, including age and time to cancer diagnosis. Early recognition of donor-derived malignancy has treatment implications. We describe the molecular characterization of a gastric cancer transmitted from an organ donor to heart, liver (LR), left kidney (LKR), and right kidney-pancreas (KPR) recipients. Methods: IRB approval for chart review was obtained; LR, LKR, and KPR also provided research consent for molecular profiling. Short Tandem Repeat (STR) genotyping was performed by polymerase chain reaction and gel electrophoresis. Tumor and germline DNA from patients and the organ donor were subjected to next generation sequencing (NGS) of 479 genes. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was used to confirm MET amplification. Results: Donor origin was established by STR analysis, with the tumors showing high levels of donor alleles. Pathology revealed a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with signet ring features. Immunohistochemical staining and CA-19-9 elevation were most consistent with gastric or pancreas origin. Tumor sequencing was notable for somatic mutation of CDH1, MET amplification and wild-type KRAS genes. Tumors from LR and KPR were nearly identical based on pathogenic variants, allele frequency, and copy number variation. Insufficient tumor cellularity in all LKR specimens precluded NGS profiling, but clinical testing found that the cancer was mismatch repair proficient; ERBB2 equivocal; and PDL-1 positive. A circulating tumor DNA test did not uncover any genomic alterations; however, MET amplification was confirmed in this tumor using FISH probes. Conclusions: STR analysis and reporting should be standard immediately following diagnosis of cancer in an organ transplant recipient to ascertain donor derivation. Further molecular characterization, including NGS, may aid in defining primary tumor origin. Here, diagnosis with PDL1-positive gastric cancer enabled use of pembrolizumab. One patient remains alive and without evidence of cancer following prompt organ explant after cancer was reported in other recipients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.