In this paper, we consider the preemptive scheduling of hard-real-time sporadic task systems on one processor. We first give necessary and sufficient conditions for a sporadic task system to be feasible (i.e., schedulable). The conditions cannot, in general, be tested efficiently (unless P = NP). They do, however, lead to a feasibility test that runs in efficient pseudo-polynomial time for a very large percentage of sporadic task systems.
In this 25th year anniversary paper for the IEEE Real Time Systems Symposium, we review the key results in real-time scheduling theory and the historical events that led to the establishment of the current realtime computing infrastructure. We conclude this paper by looking at the challenges ahead of us.
A~stract-Two important characteristics of time-critical systems are: the requirement to satisfy stringent timing constraints, and the need to guard against an, imperfect execution environment. In this paper, we formalize the safety analysis of timing properties in real-time syste~s. Our analysis is based on a formal logic: RTL (Real-Time Logic) which is especially suitable for reasoning about the timing behavior of systems. Given the for~al specification of a~ystem a~d a safety assertion to be analyzed, our goal is to relate the safety assertion to the systems specification. There are three distinct eases: 1) the safety assertion is, a theorem derivable from the systems specification, 2) the safety assertion is,~nsatisfia~le with respect to the systems specification, or 3) the negation of the safety assertion is satisfiable under certain conditions. A systematic method for performing safety analysis will be presented.'
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.