Diesel is a complex mixture containing polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, which persist after a spill, pass readily from water into tissues, and are toxic to early life stages of fish. The bioavailability and chronic toxicity of hydrocarbons dissolved into water from floating diesel (water-accommodated fraction) and chemically dispersed diesel (chemically enhanced water-accommodated fraction) were measured by the extent of ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) induction in juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and by the severity of blue sac disease in embryos. The water-accommodated fraction of floating diesel was virtually nontoxic to embryos at nominal concentrations up to 1,000 mg/L, causing only small weight changes. Liver EROD induction in juvenile trout was only observed at the highest nominal water-accommodated fraction concentration (10,000 mg/L). Chemical dispersion increased the bioavailability and toxicity of diesel to trout by 100-fold. Diesel chemically enhanced water-accommodated fraction induced EROD activity, caused blue sac disease, and impaired development and growth of embryonic trout at nominal concentrations as low as 10 mg/L; 88% mortality occurred at 100 mg/L. However, when total hydrocarbon concentrations were measured, differences between dispersed and undispersed diesel disappeared, with a median lethal concentration of 8 mg/L of total hydrocarbons and sublethal median effective concentrations ranging from 1.3 to 6.1 mg/L. Dispersion of diesel by high-energy mechanical mixing was recently reported to cause acute lethality to juvenile trout between 40 and 200 mg/L. Therefore, dispersion of oil by any means increases the bioavailability and apparent toxicity of diesel to fish embryos without changing the toxicity of its components. Nevertheless, in an actual spill, dispersion of diesel increases the effects of oil on fish populations.

Canada’s Northwest Territories (NWT) is currently the focus of significant exploration and development activity. In particular, increased global demand for oil and gas resources has resulted in an escalation in the search for hydrocarbon deposits. Canada’s north is a landscape defined by water where large numbers of pristine water bodies still exist in remote areas. Northern development activities conducted in these areas will affect these sensitive aquatic ecosystems that support important fish and fish habitat. Fishes in low productivity northern systems grow slowly and mature late, making them particularly sensitive to environmental perturbations. The fishery resources of the NWT are an integral component of our northern ecosystems, and are of significant economic and cultural importance to northern people. By necessity, linear developments constructed in the NWT, such as roads, seismic lines, and pipelines, intersect lakes, rivers, and streams. This paper discusses linear development activities and their impacts on northern fishes, with a focus on oil and gas developments. Once a target area is identified, the development of northern oil and gas reserves typically follows a predictable sequence of events: (i) construction of temporary access roads into the exploration area to conduct seismic surveys to delineate reserves; (ii) exploration well(s) are drilled to assess the potential of the deposit; (iii) if the deposit is of economic interest, then production wells are developed and gathering systems constructed, often coupled with additional transportation infrastructure; (iv) a pipeline is then built to move the hydrocarbons southward to processing facilities; and (v) after the reserve is depleted, closure of all associated infrastructure is conducted and the site is remediated. The main stressors from these activities that may impact fish and aquatic ecosystems include sediment transport to water bodies, noise and pressure impacts from the use of explosives, water withdrawal, obstructions to flow and fish passage, removal of in-stream structure and riparian vegetation, enhanced access and fisheries exploitation, and contaminant spills. These stressors can adversely affect fish directly (e.g., through direct toxicity associated with exposure to elevated contaminants) or indirectly (e.g., through habitat degradation). Such impacts on fish can vary in severity, and on temporal and spatial scales, depending on the nature and extent of the disturbance. These activities can have cumulative impacts and can be exacerbated by natural or indirect stressors, such as a changing climate or forest fires. Appropriate baseline monitoring needs to be conducted, prior to development, to allow for appropriate mitigation to be employed and sound and responsible resource management decisions to be made within an adaptive management framework.

No abstract