BACKGROUND AND PURPOSENeutrophil elastase plays a crucial role in arthritis. Here, its potential in triggering joint inflammation and pain was assessed, and whether these effects were mediated by proteinase-activated receptor-2 (PAR2). EXPERIMENTAL APPROACHNeutrophil elastase (5 μg) was injected into the knee joints of mice and changes in blood perfusion, leukocyte kinetics and paw withdrawal threshold were assessed. Similar experiments were performed in animals pretreated with the neutrophil elastase inhibitor sivelestat, the PAR2 antagonist GB83, the p44/42 MAPK inhibitor U0126 and in PAR2 receptor knockout (KO) mice. Neutrophil elastase activity was also evaluated in arthritic joints by fluorescent imaging and sivelestat was assessed for anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties. KEY RESULTSIntra-articular injection of neutrophil elastase caused an increase in blood perfusion, leukocyte kinetics and a decrease in paw withdrawal threshold. Sivelestat treatment suppressed this effect. The PAR2 antagonist GB83 reversed neutrophil elastase-induced synovitis and pain and these responses were also attenuated in PAR2 KO mice. The MAPK inhibitor U0126 also blocked neutrophil elastase-induced inflammation and pain. Active neutrophil elastase was increased in acutely inflamed knees as shown by an activatable fluorescent probe. Sivelestat appeared to reduce neutrophil elastase activity, but had only a moderate anti-inflammatory effect in this model. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONSNeutrophil elastase induced acute inflammation and pain in knee joints of mice. These changes are PAR2-dependent and appear to involve activation of a p44/42 MAPK pathway. Blocking neutrophil elastase, PAR2 and p44/42 MAPK activity can reduce inflammation and pain, suggesting their utility as therapeutic targets. DOI:10.1111/bph.13237 www.brjpharmacol.org © 2015 The British Pharmacological Society Themed Section: Inflammation: maladies, models, mechanisms and molecules BJP British Journal of Pharmacology LINKED ARTICLESThis article is part of a themed section on Inflammation: maladies, models, mechanisms and molecules. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx

A new therapeutic option for treating arthritis pain.

No abstract

Amitriptyline, a non-selective noradrenaline (NA) and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) reuptake inhibitor, has recently been demonstrated to produce a peripheral antinociceptive action in an inflammatory (formalin test) and a neuropathic pain model (spinal nerve ligation). In the present study, we determined whether desipramine, a selective NA reuptake inhibitor, and fluoxetine, a selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor, could produce peripheral antinociceptive actions in these same tests. Effects on paw volume also were determined. In the 2.5% formalin test, desipramine and fluoxetine 10-300 nmol produced a dose-related reduction in phase 2 (16-60 min) flinching and biting/licking behaviours when coadministered with the formalin. Phase 1 flinch behaviours (0-12 min) were significantly reduced at the highest dose. These actions are peripherally mediated, as they were not seen when desipramine or fluoxetine (100, 300 nmol) were injected into the contralateral hindpaw. The peripheral action of desipramine and fluoxetine was not altered by coadministration of caffeine 1500 nmol. In the spinal nerve ligation model, desipramine 100 nmol, but not fluoxetine 100 nmol, produced a peripheral anti-hyperalgesic action in the hindpaw corresponding to the ligated side when thresholds were determined using a thermal paw stimulator. In paw volume experiments, desipramine, at doses which are maximally effective in behavioural tests, produced only a slight increase in paw volume, but fluoxetine (10-300 nmol) produced a robust and sustained dose-related increase in paw volume. Amitriptyline also produced minimal effects on paw volume. When coinjected with formalin, no agent significantly altered the degree of paw swelling produced by formalin. The increase in paw volume produced by fluoxetine was inhibited by ketanserin (5-HT2 receptor antagonist), mepyramine (histamine H1 receptor antagonist) and phentolamine (alpha-adrenergic receptor antagonist), but not by the other selective 5-HT receptor antagonists tested or caffeine. The pronounced peripheral pain alleviating actions in the absence of marked changes in paw volume produced by desipramine and amitriptyline, but not fluoxetine, in the formalin test and the spinal nerve ligation model suggest that these agents could be developed as cream or gel formulations to recruit a peripheral antinociceptive action in inflammatory and neuropathic pain states. Such a formulation might permit the attainment of higher and more efficacious concentrations in the region of the sensory nerve terminal, with limited systemic side effects.

The present study determined (1) whether amitriptyline could produce a local antinociceptive action in the formalin test, (2) whether endogenous adenosine was involved in this action, and (3) which other systems might contribute to such an action. Coadministration of amitriptyline 10-100 nmol with 2.5% formalin produced a dose-related reduction in phase 1 (0-12 min) and phase 2 (16-60 min) flinching behaviours, as well as in phase 2 biting/licking time (no phase 1 expression). This action was not seen or only partially expressed at low concentrations of formalin (0.5%, 0.75%). Coadministration of caffeine with amitriptyline partially reversed the antinociceptive action of amitriptyline against both behaviours at 2.5% formalin. At 1.5% formalin, caffeine still produced only a partial reversal of effect; this appeared to be due to a block of adenosine A1 receptors, as it was also seen with the selective adenosine A1 receptor antagonist, 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dimethylxanthine. Using antagonists for a number of other systems, no evidence for an involvement of alpha-adrenergic, histamine, excitatory amino acid or opioid receptors in the action of amitriptyline was observed or inferred. A local anaesthetic action for amitriptyline remains a possibility for the residual action. These results indicate that amitriptyline can produce a local peripheral antinociceptive action which is mediated, in part, by an interaction with endogenous adenosine, most likely an inhibition of the cellular uptake of adenosine with a consequent activation of adenosine A1 receptors on sensory nerve terminals. Local application of amitriptyline by cream or gel might prove to be a useful method of drug delivery in inflammatory pain states.

In this study we investigated experiences of parents of children with cerebral palsy (CP) to identify areas in which health care providers and educators could improve practice. A second objective was to create educational material for parents of young children newly diagnosed with CP. A purposive sample of nine parents, who previously participated in the Adolescent Study of Quality of Life, Mobility, and Exercise, was recruited through phone. During an interview, parents reflected on the experience of raising a child with CP from birth to young adulthood. These interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and coded using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-informed model and analyzed to identify major themes. Parents elaborated upon what was helpful and what could be changed to improve their children's and families' experiences through supports, advocacy, and education at different levels. The results informed the development of tips for parents and children with CP to enhance their families' experiences and interactions with health care providers, educators, and others.

This study examines the pain-relieving properties of the local peripheral administration of ketamine and amitriptyline, two drugs in current clinical use, in a thermal injury model of hyperalgesia and demonstrates both antihyperalgesic and analgesic properties. These observations provide support for their potential use as local (e.g., topical) analgesics.

BackgroundA subset of osteoarthritis (OA) patients experience joint pain with neuropathic characteristics. Mediators such as neutrophil elastase, a serine proteinase, may be released during acute OA inflammatory flares. We have previously shown that local administration of neutrophil elastase causes joint inflammation and pain via activation of proteinase-activated receptor-2 (PAR2). The aim of this study was to examine the contribution of endogenous neutrophil elastase and PAR2 to the development of joint inflammation, pain, and neuropathy associated with monoiodoacetate (MIA)-induced experimental OA.MethodsMIA (0.3 mg/10 μl) was injected into the right knee joint of male C57BL/6 mice (20–34 g). Joint inflammation (edema, leukocyte kinetics), neutrophil elastase proteolytic activity, tactile allodynia, and saphenous nerve demyelination were assessed over 14 days post-injection. The effects of inhibiting neutrophil elastase during the early inflammatory phase of MIA (days 0 to 3) were determined using sivelestat (50 mg/kg i.p.) and serpinA1 (10 μg i.p.). Involvement of PAR2 in the development of MIA-induced joint inflammation and pain was studied using the PAR2 antagonist GB83 (5 μg i.p. days 0 to 1) and PAR2 knockout animals.ResultsMIA caused an increase in neutrophil elastase proteolytic activity on day 1 (P < 0.0001), but not on day 14. MIA also generated a transient inflammatory response which peaked on day 1 (P < 0.01) then subsided over the 2-week time course. Joint pain appeared on day 1 and persisted to day 14 (P < 0.0001). By day 14, the saphenous nerve showed signs of demyelination. Early treatment with sivelestat and serpinA1 blocked the proteolytic activity of neutrophil elastase on day 1 (P < 0.001), and caused lasting improvements in joint inflammation, pain, and saphenous nerve damage (P < 0.05). MIA-induced synovitis was reversed by early treatment with GB83 and attenuated in PAR2 knockout mice (P < 0.05). PAR2 knockout mice also showed reduced MIA-induced joint pain (P < 0.0001) and less nerve demyelination (P = 0.81 compared to saline control).ConclusionsNeutrophil elastase and PAR2 contribute significantly to the development of joint inflammation, pain, and peripheral neuropathy associated with experimental OA, suggesting their potential as therapeutic targets.