It remains controversial whether using two hands and multiple fingers provides any perceptual advantage over a single index finger. The present study examines this long-running question in the haptic-exploration literature by applying rigorous, psychophysical, and mathematical modeling techniques. We compared the performance of fourteen blindfolded sighted participants on seven tactile-map tasks using seven finger conditions. All tasks were benefited by multiple fingers, but it varied whether multiple fingers were beneficial on one hand, two hands, or both. Line-tracing tasks were performed faster when two hands were used, but not more than one finger per hand. Local and global search tasks were faster with multiple fingers, but not two hands. Distance comparison tasks were also performed faster with multiple fingers, and sometimes with two hands. Lastly, moving in a straight line was faster with multiple fingers, but was especially difficult with just two index fingers. These results provide empirical evidence that multiple hands and fingers benefit haptic perception, but the benefits are more complex than simply extending the tactile field of 'view'. This analogy between touch and vision fails to account for the autonomous movements and sensations of the fingers, which we show benefit the haptic perceptual system.

In a previous paper we documented that sighted participants complete haptic tasks faster with two hands and multiple fingers, but that these benefits are task specific. The present study investigates whether these effects are the same for participants who are blind. We compared the performance of fourteen blind participants on seven tactile-map tasks using seven finger conditions. As with sighted participants, blind participants performed all tasks faster with multiple fingers. Line-tracing tasks were faster with fingers added to an already in-use hand, and sometimes when added to the second hand. Local and global search tasks were faster with multiple fingers and two hands. Distance comparison tasks were performed faster with multiple fingers, but not two hands. Lastly, moving in a straight line was faster with multiple fingers. These results reinforce our previous finding that the haptic system performs best when it can exploit the independence of multiple fingers. Furthermore, in every instance that an effect was different between sighted and blind participants, the blind participants benefitted more from two hands or multiple fingers than the sighted participants. This indicates that the blind participants have learned, through experience or training, how to best take advantage of multiple fingers during haptic tasks.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract