Somatoform pain is a highly prevalent, debilitating condition and a tremendous public health problem. Effective treatments for somatoform pain are urgently needed. The etiology of this condition is, however, still unknown. On the basis of a review of recent basic and clinical research, we propose one potential mechanisms of symptom formation in somatoform pain and a developmental theory of its pathogenesis. The emerging evidence from animal and human studies in developmental neurobiology, cognitive-affective neuroscience, psychoneuroimmunology, genetics, epigenetics, and clinical and treatment studies of somatoform pain all point to the existence of a shared physical and social pain neural system. Research findings also show that non-optimal early experiences interact with genetic predispositions to influence the development of this shared system and ability to regulate it in an effective way. Interpersonal affect regulation between infant and caregiver is crucial for the optimal development of these brain circuits. The aberrant development of this shared neural system during infancy, childhood and adolescence, therefore, may ultimately lead to an increased sensitivity to physical and social pain and to problems with their regulation in adulthood. The authors critically review translational research findings that support this theory and discuss its clinical and research implications. Specifically, the proposed theory and reviewed research suggest that psychotherapeutic and/or pharmacologic interventions that foster the development of affect regulation capacities in an interpersonal context will also serve to more effectively modulate aberrantly activated neural pain circuits and thus be of particular benefit in the treatment of somatoform pain.

Central sensitization is a process that links a variety of chronic pain disorders that are characterized by hypersensitivity to noxious stimuli and pain in response to non-noxious stimuli. Among these disorders, treatments that act centrally may have greater efficacy than treatments acting peripherally. Because many individuals with post-treatment Lyme syndrome (PTLS) have a similar symptom cluster, central sensitization may be a process mediating or exacerbating their sensory processing. This article reviews central sensitization, reports new data on sensory hyperarousal in PTLS, explores the potential role of central sensitization in symptom chronicity, and suggests new directions for neurophysiologic and treatment research.

Objective: Chronic pain is highly prevalent among patients with mood, anxiety, personality, and somatic symptom disorders; and patients with chronic pain often suffer from persistent interpersonal distress. However, the neural mechanisms underlying this phenomenon and its possible role in the etiology of chronic pain are not yet understood. Based on our Developmental Theory of Centralized/Somatoform Pain, and prior research suggesting the existence of a shared neural system subserving interpersonal emotions and pain, we aimed to identify the neural basis for modulation of pain by feelings of interpersonal rejection and the role of the early interpersonal environment in development of this shared neural system.Methods: During fMRI scanning, 22 healthy participants received moderately painful thermal stimuli in 3 interpersonal contexts: Acceptance, Rejection, and Reacceptance (modified Cyberball paradigm). Early interpersonal environment was assessed using the Parental Bonding Instrument.Results: Interpersonal context modulated activity in pain neural systems during rejection and during accepting interactions with previously rejecting others. Moreover, the subjective perception of rejection, even when rejection was not occurring, correlated positively with reported pain severity and neural activity in the insula. The magnitude of neural modulation in pain circuits by feelings of rejection was associated with the quality of early interpersonal experience with caregivers.

Objective Symptoms of hypochondriasis are sometimes attributed to personality psychopathology by health care providers. The goals of this study were to assess the prevalence of personality disorder comorbidity (PD) in hypochondriasis (HYP) and to compare the PD comorbidity profile of patients with HYP to that found among patients with other disorders characterized by intrusive thoughts and fears. Methods SCID-I and SCID-II were administered to 179 individuals: 62 with HYP, 46 with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD), and 71 with Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD). For group contrasts, the samples were “purified” of the comparison comorbid disorders. General linear models were used to test the combined effect of group (HYP, OCD, SAD), age, and gender on the PD outcome variables. Results 59.7% of HYP subjects had no Axis II comorbidity. The most common PDs in HYP were paranoid (19.4%), avoidant (17.7%), and obsessive compulsive (14.5%). HYP significantly differed from SAD in the likelihood of a cluster C disorder, whereas no significant difference was noted for HYP vs OCD. The proportion of subjects having at least two PDs was not significantly different for HYP vs OCD or for HYP vs SAD. Conclusion Although 40% of patients with hypochondriasis have PD comorbidity as assessed by the SCID-II, the amount of PD comorbidity is not significantly different than found among individuals with two comparison anxiety disorders. Therefore, health providers should be aware that PD may complicate the clinical profile of HYP but they should avoid assuming that PD psychopathology is the primary source of hypochondriacal distress.

Somatization syndromes are highly prevalent disorders with unknown etiology and are challenging to treat. Integrating previous findings on alexithymia, attachment, and trauma, we hypothesized that somatization syndromes are associated with a specific internal representation of relationships-the unmet need for closeness with others (desire for interpersonal closeness combined with the fear of being rejected, hurt, or abandoned). Twenty patients with DSM-IV somatization syndromes and 20 well-matched healthy controls completed the Relationship Anecdotes Paradigm/Core Conflictual Relationship Themes interview and measures of interpersonal relatedness, alexithymia, and history of trauma. The results showed that the unmet need for closeness with others was the main internal representation of relationships in 90% of the patients and in only 10% of controls; it was also the strongest predictor of somatization syndrome diagnosis. This suggests that somatization syndromes are strongly associated with the interpersonal representation of the unmet need for closeness with others, which has direct implications for their treatment and future research on their etiology.