No abstract

No abstract

Background Adjuvant regional anesthesia is often selected for patients or procedures with high risk of pulmonary complications after general anesthesia. The benefit of adjuvant regional anesthesia to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications remains uncertain. In a prospective observational multicenter study, patients scheduled for non-cardiothoracic surgery with at least one postoperative pulmonary complication surprisingly received adjuvant regional anesthesia more frequently than those with no complications. We hypothesized that, after adjusting for surgical and patient complexity variables, the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications would not be associated with adjuvant regional anesthesia. Methods We performed a secondary analysis of a prospective observational multicenter study including 1202 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 3 patients undergoing non-cardiothoracic surgery. Patients were classified as receiving either adjuvant regional anesthesia or general anesthesia alone. Predefined pulmonary complications within the first seven postoperative days were prospectively identified. Groups were compared using bivariable and multivariable hierarchical logistic regression analyses for the outcome of at least one postoperative pulmonary complication. Results Adjuvant regional anesthesia was performed in 266 (22.1%) patients and not performed in 936 (77.9%). The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications was greater in patients receiving adjuvant regional anesthesia (42.1%) than in patients without it (30.9%) (site adjusted p = 0.007), but this association was not confirmed after adjusting for covariates (adjusted OR 1.37; 95% CI, 0.83–2.25; p = 0.165). Conclusion After adjusting for surgical and patient complexity, adjuvant regional anesthesia versus general anesthesia alone was not associated with a greater incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in this multicenter cohort of non-cardiothoracic surgery patients.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Disruption in airflow can result in a life-threatening emergency due to inadequate gas exchange, and being able to quickly acknowledge and resolve this critical issue is key to the successful management of patients in perioptherative arena. While it may arise from several mechanisms, two clinically important ones that are often encountered are endobronchial intubation and foreign-body aspiration. Endobronchial intubation is the most common. It is easily treated, often goes unrecognized, and may result in patient harm. Foreign-body aspiration may present in a number of different ways and with varying clinical acuity. This chapter discusses the signs, symptoms, consequences, and management of airflow disruption arising from these two potential causes.

No abstract