All books in this flagship series contain carefully selected substantial extracts from key cases, legislation, and academic debate, providing able students with a stand-alone resource. EU Competition Law: Text, Cases, and Materials provides a complete guide to European competition law in a single authoritative volume, pairing extract material with clear and in-depth author commentary. Carefully selected extracts from key cases, academic articles, and statutory materials are accompanied by in-depth commentary and critique from two experienced academics in the field. Thorough footnoting and referencing give a tour of the available literature, making this an ideal text for undergraduate and postgraduate students, as well as competition law scholars engaged in specialized study. This fifth edition has been fully updated with: detailed coverage and commentary on judgments, decisions, regulations and other measures published by competition law authorities including the Court of Justice, the European Court of Human Rights, the European Commission, and various national courts; coverage of key Article 101 cases including Expedia , T-Mobile , Pierre Fabre , Allianz Hungária Biztosító Zrt , and Generali-Providencia Biztosító Zrt v. Gazdasági Versenyhivatal ; Article 102 cases, including TeliaSonera , Deutsche Telekom , Telefónica , Tomra , Post Danmark , and AstraZeneca ; and thorough discussion of ongoing developments in competition law, including the Commission's aggressive enforcement policy against cartels, the review of merger processes and regulations, the compatibility of EU competition procedures with human rights provisions, and the increased number of Article 267 references from national courts.
The Internet financial reporting language known as XBRL continues to develop and has now reached the point where much of its promised benefits are available. The authors look at the history of this project, provide a case study of how Morgan Stanley has made use of the system and predict some developments for the future.
Commentary in both the US and the EU has repeatedly debated whether, and when, it is more efficient to use "rules" or "standards" to determine the legality of conduct subject to the antitrust laws and how such rules or standards should be formulated. This paper concentrates principally on the question of how this debate impacts on the analytical framework for identifying infringing agreements in the US and EU. It sets out the view that the question of how agreements are to be analysed under both the US and the EU jurisprudence is unduly opaque. Confusion as to, in particular, the role and scope of per se rules, the role and scope of ancillary restraint doctrines, and how competing anti-and procompetitive effects of mixed agreements are to be balanced against each other have led to excessive complexity in the system.The paper considers what factors might shape development of a coherent and optimal framework for antitrust analysis in a jurisdiction. Once these factors have been set out, it examines how US and EU competition law have approached the issues identified in relation to the analysis of agreements and what features of each system have moulded the developments there. It concludes that both systems require some development to create more intelligible frameworks for antitrust analysis of agreements based on common concepts rather than historical categories of antitrust analysis and, further, that competition agencies could play an important part as catalysts in this progress.
Following Judith Butler's idea of “materialization,” the authors consider the effects of three different approaches to historical information about the educational relationship between indigenous and settler peoples. As a part of an argument about how one might legitimately study the establishment of such a relationship and take seriously the viewpoint of the indigenous people, the authors asks what it becomes possible to think when we eschew popular “multiple discourses” in favour of a strategic engagement with a post-interpretivist empiricism. The authors — respectively descendants of white settlers and indigenous Māori — focus on a material reality not present in the archives recording the initial interactions between the indigenous people and the first permanent British settlers in New Zealand.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.