ObjectiveTo estimate the association between cumulative anticholinergic burden and falls and fractures in patients with overactive bladder (OAB).DesignA retrospective claims-based study (2007–2015) of patients with OAB; outcomes from a subset were contrasted to a non-OAB comparison.SettingUnited States, commercially and Medicare-insured population.Participants154 432 adults with OAB and 86 966 adults without OAB, mean age of 56 years, and 67.9% women.Main outcome measuresCumulative anticholinergic burden, a unitless value representing exposure over time, was estimated over the 12 months pre-index (‘at baseline’) and every 6 months post index. Burden was categorised as no burden (0), low burden (1–89), medium burden (90–499) or high burden (500+). Unadjusted rates of falls or fractures were estimated, and the increased risk associated with anticholinergic burden (measured at the closest 6-month interval prior to a fall or fracture) was assessed using a Cox proportional hazards model and a marginal structural model.ResultsMedian (IQR) baseline anticholinergic burden was 30 (0.0–314.0) and higher among older (≥65 years, 183 [3.0–713.0]) versus younger (<65 years, 13 [0.0–200.0]) adults. The unadjusted rate of falls or fractures over the period was 5.0 per 100 patient-years, ranging from 3.1 (95% CI 3.0–3.2) for those with no burden, to 7.4 (95% CI 7.1–7.6) for those with high burden at baseline. The adjusted risk of falls and fractures was greater with higher anticholinergic burden in the previous 6 months, with an HR of 1.2 (95% CI 1.2 to 1.3) for low burden versus no burden, to 1.4 (95% CI 1.3 to 1.4) for high versus no burden. Estimates from marginal structural models adjusting for time-varying covariates were lower but remained significantly higher with a higher anticholinergic burden. Rates of falls and fractures were approximately 40% higher among those with OAB (vs those without).ConclusionHigher levels of anticholinergic burden are associated with higher rates of falls and fractures, highlighting the importance of considering anticholinergic burden when treating patients with OAB.

Background Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a severe rare progressive inherited neuromuscular disorder, leading to loss of ambulation (LOA) and premature mortality. The standard of care for patients with DMD has been treatment with corticosteroids for the past decade; however a synthesis of contemporary data describing the clinical course of DMD is lacking. The objective was to summarize age at key clinical milestones (loss of ambulation, scoliosis, ventilation, cardiomyopathy, and mortality) in the corticosteroid-treatment-era. Methods A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE and EMBASE. The percentage experiencing key clinical milestones, and the mean or median age at those milestones, was synthesized from studies from North American populations, published between 2007 and 2018. Results From 5637 abstracts, 29 studies were included. Estimates of the percentage experiencing key clinical milestones, and age at those milestones, showed heterogeneity. Up to 30% of patients lost ambulation by age 10 years, and up to 90% by 15 years of age. The mean age at scoliosis onset was approximately 14 years. Ventilatory support began from 15 to 18 years, and up to half of patients required ventilation by 20 years of age. Registry-based estimates suggest that 70% had evidence of cardiomyopathy by 15 years and almost all by 20 years of age. Finally, mortality rates up to 16% by age 20 years were reported; among those surviving to adulthood mortality was up to 60% by age 30 years. Conclusions Contemporary natural history studies from North America report that LOA on average occurs in the early teens, need for ventilation and cardiomyopathy in the late teens, and death in the third or fourth decade of life. Variability in rates may be due to differences in study design, treatment with corticosteroids or other disease-modifying agents, variations in clinical practices, and dystrophin mutations. Despite challenges in synthesizing estimates, these findings help characterize disease progression among contemporary North American DMD patients.

No abstract

Objective: In the absence of head-to-head comparisons, the objective of this study was to conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) to indirectly compare the relative efficacy and safety of rimegepant, ubrogepant, and lasmiditan for the acute treatment of migraine. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of rimegepant, ubrogepant, and lasmiditan in adults with acute migraine. Outcomes included sustained pain freedom and -relief 2-48 hours post-dose, and adverse events. No RCTs were identified that directly compared these interventions. Therefore, a fixed-effects Bayesian NMA was conducted by identifying a connected (via comparison to placebo) network of RCTs. Results: Five RCTs were identified as follows: rimegepant study 303 (n = 1,466), ubrogepant ACHIEVE I and II (n = 1,672 and n = 1,686, respectively), and lasmiditan SAMURAI and SPARTAN (n = 2,231 and n = 3,005, respectively). Efficacy outcomes (pain freedom and relief at 2, 24, 48 hours) tended to be highest for lasmiditan 200 mg and rimegepant followed lower doses of lasmiditan and all doses of ubrogepant. However, lasmiditan 200 mg was also associated with higher rates of adverse events, particularly somnolence and dizziness. Conclusions: Lasmiditan, rimegepant, and ubrogepant all performed significantly better than placebo with respect to pain freedom and pain relief. Efficacy results were similar for rimegepant and lasmiditan with rimegepant having higher rates of pain freedom and relief than lower doses of lasmiditan, while somnolence and dizziness outcomes were lower for rimegepant than higher doses of lasmiditan.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) affects approximately 6 million Americans, with prevalence projected to increase by 46% and direct medical costs to reach $53 billion by 2030. Hospitalizations are the largest component of direct costs for HF; however, recent syntheses of the economic and clinical burden of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) are lacking. OBJECTIVE:To synthesize contemporary estimates of cost and clinical outcomes of HHF in the United States. METHODS:A systematic literature review was conducted using MEDLINE and Embase to identify articles reporting cost or charge per HHF in the United States published between January 2014 and May 2019. Subgroups of interest were those with both HF and renal disease or diabetes, as well as HF with reduced or preserved ejection fraction (HFrEF or HFpEF).RESULTS: 23 studies reporting cost and/or charge per HHF were included. Sample sizes ranged from 989 to approximately 11 million (weighted), mean age from 65 to 83 years, and 39% to 74% were male.