Individuals with autism show relatively strong performance on tasks that require them to identify the constituent parts of a visual stimulus. This is assumed to be the result of a bias towards processing the local elements in a display that follows from a weakened ability to integrate information at the global level. The results of the current study showed that, among children with autism, ability to locate a figure embedded in a larger stimulus was only related to performance on visual search trials where the target was identified by a unique perceptual feature. In contrast, control children's embedded figures performance was specifically related to their performance on visual search trials where the target was defined by a conjunction of features. This double dissociation suggests that enhanced performance on perceptual tasks by children with autism is not simply a consequence of a quantitative difference in ability to engage in global processing.

SUMMARY A 72 year old woman complained of transient loss of vision in the left eye. She had undergone a left carotid endarterectorny 10 yean previously. Reduced ophthalmic artery pressure was found on noninvasive carotid artery testing and cerebral angiography was performed. No lesion was erident in the carotid artery, but significant ophthalmic artery stenosis was identified. We report this case as showing the occurrence of amaurosis fugax in association with ophthalmic artery stenosis.

Objective Idelalisib is a first-in-class oral PI3Kd inhibitor approved for use in combination with rituximab in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We describe the characteristics, causes of discontinuation, and outcomes in patients who discontinued treatment after idelalisib therapy. Methods 38 R/R CLL patients participated in 5 idelalisib combination trials at the North Shore-LIJ Cancer Institute and were included in this analysis. The patients were enrolled from 2011 until 2014, and data were locked in March 1st, 2015. Patients were evaluated for time to therapy discontinuation and reasons for discontinuation. The majority of the patients had been heavily pretreated and 39% of the patients had a high risk prognostic marker including deletion of 11q or 17p. 21 R/R CLL patients participated in the Phase Ib trial of idelalisib in combination with several agents including Rituximab (R), Bendamustine (B) ± R, Fludarabine, Chlorambucil ± R, and Ofatumumab. The trial was designed for 48 weeks and patients were allowed to continue on an extension trial with idelalisib if still deriving benefit. Patients on the parent trial were on therapy a median of 335 days. 42% (11/21) continued in the extension trial at the end of the parent trial. Causes of discontinuation from initial 48-week trial included: grade 4 transaminitis (1) on day 64 with failed rechallenge at lower doses; Richter's transformation (1) on day 161; grade 3/4 diarrhea/colitis (4) on days 52, 231, 255, and 365; refractory/progressive CLL (2) on days 8 and 170; aplastic anemia (1) on day 172; and septic shock in a patient with uncontrolled autoimmune hemolytic anemia (1) on day 271. Of the patients on the extension trial, the median time on drug was 412 days with 27% (3/11) discontinuing due to grade 3/4 diarrhea/colitis; 36% (4/11) due to progression, 9% (1/11) due to pneumonia and subsequent progression 2 months later. Of the 3 patients that remain on study, their median time on therapy is 1072 days without evidence of toxicities. Of the 17 patients that participated in placebo-controlled phase III studies, 11 participated in R +/- idelalisib (study 116) and 6 on BR+/-idelalisib (study 115). Study 116 was unblinded during the trial: 35% (4/11) received idelalisib + R upfront. Of these, only 2 patients (50%) were able to continue on extension study as the other 2 patients developed pneumonitis and were taken off study early. One patient is continues on study at day 1011 whereas the second patient developed progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy on day 714 and died days after being taken off drug. 86% (6/7) of the remaining patients initially randomized to placebo crossed over to idelalisib at the time of confirmed progression. Of these, 14% (1/6) developed both colitis and later pneumonitis, 14% (1/6) withdrew consent, and 14% (1/6) had progression of disease. For blinded study 115 (BR+/-idelalisib), 6 patients participated: 33% (2/6) developed grade 3/4 diarrhea/colitis, 16% (1/6) developed pneumonitis, and 16% (1/6) has progressed. In our experience, none of the patients with severe diarrhea/colitis were able to maintain lower doses for a prolonged period of time without recurrent colitis or the development of pneumonitis. Since the start of these trials, 31% (12/38) of the patients have died: the overall survival after discontinuation for these patients varies widely from 0 to 303 days with a median overall survival of 64 days after discontinuation. Most patients with relapsed/refractory CLL who discontinued idelalisib early were difficult to treat and had poor outcomes. Over the course of the trials, the Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib was approved and used as salvage therapy in 10 patients with confirmed progression; except for 1 patient, all patients successfully achieved a prolonged response with ibrutinib suggesting salvage therapy with a targeted agent may be a reasonable therapeutic approach for patients after idelalisib failure. Interestingly, the rate of Richter's transformation was extremely rare in this study (2%). Conclusions This single-institution experience with idelalisib identifies baseline factors associated with therapy discontinuation, mainly grade 3/4 diarrhea/colitis and progression of disease as a reason for discontinuation from therapy. Our data suggest the use of ibrutinib may be a reasonable choice in patients after idelalisib failure. Disclosures Barrientos: ASH-AMFDP: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; NIH/NCATS: Research Funding. Off Label Use: idelalisib is approved in combination with rituximab only. I will discuss our experience of idelalisib in combination with other agents.

Background Initial treatment for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is not standardized. Current conventional upfront chemoimmunotherapies are generally not curative and can be deferred in some patients. This presents an opportunity to evaluate novel therapeutic approaches in the first line setting. Lenalidomide, an immunomodulatory compound which targets both the tumor cells directly and the tumor microenvironment, has shown clinical efficacy either alone or in combination with rituximab in relapsed MCL. We report findings of the first study of a chemotherapy-free approach as initial treatment for MCL, using lenalidomide and rituximab as a combination biologic doublet. Methods The study protocol includes both an induction phase and a maintenance phase. During the induction phase, lenalidomide is administered at 20 mg daily on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle for a total of 12 cycles, with dose escalation to 25 mg daily if tolerated. Standard dose rituximab is administered weekly x 4 during cycle 1, then once every other cycle, for a total of 9 doses. During the maintenance phase which starts with cycle 13, lenalidomide is administered at 15 mg daily on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle, with rituximab maintenance once every other cycle until progression of disease. The primary objective was to evaluate overall response rate (ORR). Secondary objectives included safety analysis, progression-free survival, overall survival, and QOL assessment. Based on a Simon two-stage design comparing an ORR of ≥60% with treatment to an unacceptable ORR of ≤40% (alpha=10%, power=80%), 15 or more overall responses out of 28 enrolled patients were required to declare the treatment effective and worthy of further testing. Results From 7/2011 to 2/2013, 31 subjects with previously untreated MCL were enrolled at 4 centers, and the study met its accrual. At study entry, median age was 65 years (range 42-86), and the M:F ratio was 3:1. All patients had stage III/IV disease, 12 (39%) had elevated LDH, and 27 (87%) had bone marrow involvement. MIPI scores were evenly distributed between low-, intermediate-, and high-risk (36%, 32%, and 32% respectively). Ki67 index was <30% in 23 (74%) subjects. Treatment was generally well tolerated with expected side effects. Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (39%), thrombocytopenia (13%) and anemia (7%). Grade 3-4 non-hematologic toxicities included rash (23%), tumor flare (7%) and serum sickness associated with rituximab (7%). Grade 1-2 infections included URI (29%), UTI (10%), pneumonia (10%) and sinusitis (7%). One incidence each of DVT and PE were observed and resolved with treatment. As of July 2013 at a median follow-up of 12 months (range 5-23 months), 27 (87%) patients remain on study without evidence of disease progression, including 18 who have completed induction and now in the maintenance phase. Four patients went off study – one withdrew consent, two had progression of disease, and one could not tolerate tumor flare associated side effects. Thirty patients are evaluable for efficacy with at least one response assessment. The preliminary ORR for evaluable patients is 77% (95% CI = 57% to 89%) with 40% CR/CRu (95% CI = 23% to 59%), and may further improve with additional follow-up on continued treatment. Median time to objective response was 2.8 months, with CR typically confirmed between 6-12 months. Four patients (13%) have stable disease with ongoing clinical benefit at 5+, 6+, 12+ and 13+ months. Median progression-free survival and duration of response have not been reached. Neither MIPI score nor Ki67 index correlated with response. All patients have maintained or improved quality of life parameters during treatment by FACT-Lym analysis. Conclusions This study provides the first demonstration that a chemotherapy-free, combination biologic approach is feasible as initial therapy for mantle cell lymphoma. Lenalidomide up to 25 mg daily given 21 out of 28 days can be safely combined with rituximab as frontline therapy for MCL. Preliminary efficacy data on response rates are encouraging. More precise assessment of response rate and durability will require more follow-up with additional subjects. However, these data justify further evaluation of the lenalidomide + rituximab regimen both alone and as a platform for the integration of novel agents in combination approaches in MCL both in the upfront and relapsed settings. Disclosures: Ruan: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide in the frontline treatment of mantle cell lymphoma. Martin:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Research Funding; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Consultancy, Research Funding. Shah:Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Schuster:Celgene: Research Funding. Smith:Micromet: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Allos: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy. Furman:Celgene: Research Funding. Coleman:Celgene: Consultancy. Leonard:Celgene: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy.

Introduction Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is characterized by cell cycle dysregulation due to cyclin D1 and CDK4 overexpression. Palbociclib (PD 0332991) is an orally bioavailable, specific, reversible inhibitor of CDK4/6 that induces prolonged early G1 arrest (pG1) in MCL cells and durable remissions in patients with MCL. Moreover, we have evidence that palbociclib-induced pG1 sensitizes MCL cells to killing by bortezomib and that sensitization is amplified upon withdrawal of palbociclib, when MCL cells synchronously enter S phase (pG1-S). Targeting CDK4 in combination with bortezomib, therefore, is a rational and novel therapeutic combination. We report the final results of a phase I trial of palbociclib plus bortezomib in patients with previously treated MCL. Methods Adults with previously treated MCL and adequate bone marrow and organ function were received palbociclib orally at doses of 75 mg (dose level 1), 100 mg (dose level 2), or 125 mg (dose levels 3 and 4) for 12 days. Bortezomib was administered by IV or SC injection at 1 mg/m2 (dose levels 1-3) or 1.3 mg/m2 (dose level 4) on days 8, 11, 15, and 18 of each 21-day cycle. Subjects underwent core needle biopsies of tumor tissue pre-treatment, on day 8 (in pG1) and on day 21 (in pG1-S phase) of cycle 1. Subjects were restaged following cycles 2, 5, and 8 and then every 4 cycles. Subjects could remain on the study regimen until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Dose levels were escalated according to the standard 3+3 schema. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as treatment-related grade 3-4 toxicity occurring during cycle 1 or a delay in cycle 2 of > 1 week due to treatment-related grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. The primary objective was to estimate the maximum tolerated dose of the combination. Secondary objectives included response rate, duration of response, and evaluation of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles at multiple time points and across all dose levels. Results Nineteen subjects were enrolled: 6 in dose level 1, 3 in dose level 2, 7 in dose level 3, and 3 in dose level 4. The median age was 64 years (range 42-81). The median number of prior therapies was 3 (range 1-7). The number of subjects with low, intermediate, and high-risk MIPI scores was 6, 11, and 2, respectively. Two subjects experienced DLT: thrombocytopenia (level 1), neutropenia (level 3). Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity included neutropenia (63%), thrombocytopenia (53%), lymphopenia (32%), and anemia (11%). Treatment-related grade 3-4 non-hematologic toxicity included zoster (1). Grade 1-2 toxicities occurring in >2 pt included: fatigue (47%), pain (42%), bleeding/bruising (37%), increased creatinine (26%), constipation (26%), rash (21%), nausea/vomiting (21%), sensory neuropathy (21%), dyspnea (21%), hypoalbuminemia (16%), cough (16%), edema (16%), infection (16%), increased AST (16%), hypocalcemia (16%), increased alk phos (16%). Reasons for ultimately stopping treatment include: progression (9), toxicity (6), and non-compliance (1). All 3 patients at dose level 4 required dose delays/reductions during cycle 2 due to toxicity. There appeared to be an association with dose of palbociclib and response, with one responder at each of dose levels 1 and 2, and 4 patients remaining free from progression for 1 year at dose level 3, including one complete response. Only one responding patient progressed on therapy. All patients with serial biopsies achieved pG1 on day 8, with reduction in CDK4/CDK6-specific Rb phosphorylation and Ki67 by immunohistochemistry. The primary MCL tumor cells express cell cycle genes scheduled for early G1 such as cyclin D1 and CDK4, but not genes programmed for other phases of the cell cycle such MKi67, E3F3, CDK1, CCNA2, as determined by RNA-seq. Conclusion Daily palbociclib 125 mg for 12 days can be safely combined with bortezomib 1 mg/m2 twice weekly, while higher doses were limited by myelosuppression. The combination induced durable responses in some patients. Palbociclib induced pG1, even at the lowest dose. However, the initial cell cycle control by palbociclib did not predict clinical response. Rather, pG1 appears to induce an imbalance in gene expression that is associated with response to the combination of palbociclib plus bortezomib. Strategies to control the cell cycle and dissect the underpinning mechanisms appear promising in MCL and warrant further evaluation. Disclosures: Martin: Teva: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Ruan:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Leonard:Millennium: Consultancy.

Introduction Patients with chemorefractory DLBCL have a poor prognosis, rarely achieving durable responses to additional treatment with standard chemotherapy. Epigenetic dysregulation likely contributes to lymphomagenesis and chemoresistance. Distinct epigenetic signatures predicted response to the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor (MTI) azacitidine (Aza) and vorinostat (V), a histone deacytelase inhibitor (HDACi) in DLBCL cell lines. Preclinical studies suggested synergy between MTI and HDACi in chemoresistant DLBCL cell lines. We performed a phase Ib trial to evaluate the combination of Aza plus V in patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL. Methods Subjects with relapsed or refractory DLBCL ineligible for (due to chemorefractory state or comorbidities) or relapsed after autologous stem cell transplant were treated with Aza and V at four different dose levels (DL). DL 1 consisted of Aza 55mg SC x 5 days plus V 300mg PO x 7 days. DL 2 consisted of Aza 75mg SC x 5 days plus V 200mg PO x 7 days. DL 3 and 4 used the same Aza doses as DL1 and 2 respectively but V was administered for 14 days. Treatment was administered on 28-day cycles. Subjects remained on treatment for a maximum of 6 cycles. Up to 8 subjects could be enrolled into each DL, depending on the toxicity and activity profile. If 2 patients developed dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), enrolment to that dose level was closed. Cycle 1 DLT was defined as any of the following treatment-related adverse events: Grade 3-4 non-hematologic toxicity excluding alopecia, nausea, or fatigue responding to maximal treatment; grade 4 neutropenia lasting longer than 7 days or failing to recover to > 1000 cells/mm3 within 14 days; grade 4 thrombocytopenia of any duration; grade 4 febrile neutropenia. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability as well as overall response rates (ORR). Results A total of 18 patients were enrolled. The median age was 66 years old (range 26-82). Subjects had received a median of 3 prior lines of treatment, including 3 that had undergone autologous stem cell transplantation. Thirteen patients were refractory to their previous treatment. Eight subjects were treated at DL1, 5 at DL2, 4 at DL3 and 1 at DL4. DL2 was closed early due to limited efficacy demonstrated with the 7-day course of V; only 1 out of 13 patients treated at DL1 and DL2 achieved an objective response. DL3 and DL4 were closed early after 2 patients at DL3 required dose reductions. The following grade 1-2 non-hematologic toxicities, independent of relation to study drugs, were experienced by at least 2 subjects: nausea (11), diarrhea (8), hypoglycemia (7), vomiting (5), renal impairment (5), raised ALP (5), fatigue (4), hyperglycemia (4), fever (3) and hyperbilirubinemia (3). One patient experienced grade 3 thromboembolism (DL1), 1 experienced grade 3 diarrhea (DL2), and 1 experienced grade 4 ALP increase (DL4). Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity included thrombocytopenia (8), anemia (3) and neutropenia (2). A median of 2 cycles of study regimen was administered (range 1-6). One patient completed 6 cycles of treatment and 17 patients stopped treatment due to PD. There was 1 DLT at DL1. Only one subject had an objective response (PR at DL2) and 3 subjects had stable disease. The trial was stopped prematurely because of low clinical activity and poor tolerability. Interestingly, 7 patients (2 with relapsed disease and 5 with disease refractory to prior pre-study therapy) received treatment post-study. Retrospective review of these cases demonstrated that 2 had CR (PEP-C and R-DICE) and 3 others appeared to have had a significant clinical response (bendamustine, radioimmunotherapy, and brentuximab vedotin-PEP-C), 1 had PD (PEP-C), and 1 was not formally evaluated (bendamustine). The median OS of these 7 patients was 501 days following Aza-V. Conclusions The combination of Aza and V was poorly tolerated and had minimal clinical activity at the doses/schedules tested in this study of refractory DLBCL patients. However, we observed that several heavily pre-treated and refractory patients appeared to go on to achieve better than expected responses to the next treatment following the study regimen, perhaps consistent with a chemosensitization effect (i.e., epigenetic priming) of Aza and V. Epigenetic priming in DLBCL warrants further investigation in less refractory patients and in combination with other agents. Epigenetic profiling of patient samples derived from this trial is ongoing. Disclosures: Martin: Teva: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Ruan:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Furman:Celgene: Research Funding.