There is growing interest in the trend towards co-branding alliances between non-profit and commercial entities,which are undertaken by these organisations to transfer associations and affect between each brand partner. Certainly, it makes sense that commercial entities want to gain more from their brands and that non-profits want secured funding, however, in the same way that the joining of two brands can be beneficial, it can also bring with it major risks when the brand alliance is not well received and evaluations of the alliance are not favourable. This research supports the notion that both commercial entities and non-profit organisations can benefit from a branding alliance, however, an understanding of how these brand alliances are evaluated is important. This research investigates evaluations of brand alliances and the resulting spillover effects for original brand partners that result from brand alliances. This research provides empirical support relating to reactions to brand alliances between a non-profit organisation and a commercial business in terms of how original brand attitudes, familiarity of original brands and perceived brand fit impact on evaluations. While collaboration is important and has potential benefits for each partner-they rest on partner selection and fit between alliance partners. Managerial implications and future research directions are also provided.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract