Controlled release delivery of carmustine from biodegradable polymer wafers was approved as an adjunct to surgical resection in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme after it was shown in clinical trials to be well tolerated and effective. Given the localised nature of the drug in the brain tissue, no direct pharmacokinetic measurements have been made in humans after implantation of a carmustine wafer. However, drug distribution and clearance have been extensively studied in both rodent and non-human primate brains at various times after implantation. In addition, studies to characterise the degradation of the polymer matrix, the release kinetics of carmustine and the metabolic fate of the drug and polymer degradation products have been conducted both in vitro and in vivo. GLIADEL wafers have been shown to release carmustine in vivo over a period of approximately 5 days; when in continuous contact with interstitial fluid, wafers should degrade completely over a period of 6 to 8 weeks. Metabolic elimination studies of the polymer degradation products have demonstrated that sebacic acid monomers are excreted from the body in the form of expired CO(2), whereas 1,3-bis-(p-carboxyphenoxy)propane monomers are excreted primarily through the urine. Carmustine degradation products are also excreted primarily through the urine. Pharmacokinetic studies in animals and associated modelling have demonstrated the capability of this modality to produce high dose-delivery (millimolar concentrations) within millimetres of the polymer implant, with a limited penetration distance of carmustine from the site of delivery. The limited spread of drug is presumably due to the high transcapillary permeability of this lipophilic molecule. However, the presence of significant convective flows due to postsurgical oedema may augment the diffusive transport of drug in the hours immediately after wafer implantation, leading to a larger short-term spread of drug. Additionally, in non-human primates, the presence of significant doses in more distant regions of the brain (centimetres away from the implant) has been shown to persist over the course of a week. The drug in this region was presumed to be transported from the implant site by either cerebral blood flow or cerebrospinal fluid flow, suggesting that although drug is able to penetrate the blood-brain barrier at the site of delivery, it may re-enter within the confines of the brain tissue.

These data demonstrate that when crushed and taken orally, Oxycodone DETERx® maintains its EXTENDED-release profile, while crushed OxyContin® shows a pharmacokinetic profile similar to an immediate-release product. These results suggest that Oxycodone DETERx® may be less attractive to illicit drug users compared with existing abuse-deterrent-formulations, while providing a safer option for patients who may unknowingly crush their medication such as those who have difficulty swallowing.

Low water solubility and rapid elimination from the brain inhibits local delivery via implants and other delivery systems of most therapeutic drugs to the brain. We have conjugated the chemotherapy drug, camptothecin (CPT), to poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) of molecular weight 3400 using previously established protocols. These new conjugates are very water-soluble and hydrolyze at a pH-dependent rate to release the active parent drug. We have studied the uptake of these conjugates by cells in vitro and quantified their cytotoxicity toward gliosarcoma cells. These conjugates were loaded into biodegradable polymeric controlled-release implants, and their release characteristics were studied in vitro. We implanted similar polymeric disks into rat brains and used a novel sectioning scheme to determine the concentration profile of CPT in comparison to conjugated CPT in the brain after 1, 7, 14, and 28 days. We have found that PEGylation greatly increases the maximum achievable drug concentration and greatly enhances the distribution properties of CPT, compared to corelease of CPT with PEG. Although only one percent of CPT in the conjugate system was found in the hydrolyzed, active form, drug concentrations were still significantly above cytotoxic levels over a greater distance for the conjugate system. On the basis of these results, we believe that PEGylation shows great promise toward increasing drug distribution after direct, local delivery in the brain for enhanced efficacy in drug treatment.

Opioid analgesics are commonly used for the treatment of chronic low back pain (CLBP); however, abuse potential is a major concern. This study used a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, enriched-enrollment randomized-withdrawal study design to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and analgesic efficacy of an abuse-deterrent formulation of extended-release oxycodone, Xtampza ER, in opioid-naive and opioid-experienced adults with moderate-to-severe CLBP. Patients entered an open-label titration phase (N = 740); those who were successfully titrated on Xtampza ER (≥40 to ≤160 mg oxycodone hydrochloride equivalent per day) were randomized to active drug (N = 193) or placebo (N = 196) for 12 weeks. Primary efficacy results showed a statistically significant difference in average pain intensity from randomization baseline to treatment week 12 between the Xtampza ER and placebo groups (mean [±SE], -1.56 [0.267]; P < 0.0001). All sensitivity analyses results supported the primary result of the study. Secondary efficacy outcomes indicated that Xtampza ER vs placebo had more patients with improvement in patient global impression of change (26.4% vs 14.3%; P < 0.0001), longer time-to-exit from the study (58 vs 35 days; P = 0.0102), and a greater proportion of patients with ≥30% (49.2% vs 33.2%; P = 0.0013) and ≥50% (38.3% vs 24.5%; P = 0.0032) improvement in pain intensity. There was less rescue medication (acetaminophen) use in the Xtampza ER treatment group than in the placebo group. Xtampza ER had an adverse event profile consistent with other opioids and was well tolerated; no new safety concerns were identified. In conclusion, Xtampza ER resulted in clinically and statistically significant efficacy in patients with CLBP.

These mechanical manipulation and PK studies demonstrated that DETERx beads retained their ER properties after mechanical tampering and chewing by study subjects.

Oxycodone DETERx® (Collegium Pharmaceutical Inc, Canton, Massachusetts) is an extended‐release, microsphere‐in‐capsule, abuse‐deterrent formulation designed to retain its extended‐release properties after tampering (eg, chewing/crushing). This randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, triple‐dummy study evaluated the oral abuse potential of intact and chewed oxycodone DETERx capsules compared with crushed immediate‐release oxycodone. Subjects with a history of recreational opioid use who were nondependent/nontolerant to opioids were enrolled. Treatments included intact oxycodone DETERx (high‐fat, high‐calorie meal and fasted), chewed oxycodone DETERx (high‐fat, high‐calorie meal and fasted), crushed immediate‐release oxycodone (fasted), and placebo (high‐fat, high‐calorie meal). Plasma samples were collected to determine pharmacokinetic parameters. The primary endpoint was drug liking at the moment; other endpoints included drug effects questionnaire scores, Addiction Research Center Inventory/Morphine Benzedrine Group score, pupillometry measurements, and safety. Thirty‐eight subjects completed the study. Chewed and intact oxycodone DETERx were bioequivalent, unlike crushed immediate‐release oxycodone, which yielded higher peak oxycodone plasma concentrations compared with all methods of oxycodone DETERx administration. The mean maximum (peak) effect (Emax) for drug liking was significantly lower for chewed and intact oxycodone DETERx than for crushed immediate‐release oxycodone (P < .01). The time to Emax was significantly longer for chewed and intact oxycodone DETERx than for crushed immediate‐release oxycodone (P < .0001). Scores for feeling high and Addiction Research Center Inventory/Morphine Benzedrine Group scores demonstrated lower abuse potential for chewed and intact oxycodone DETERx compared with crushed immediate‐release oxycodone. Study treatments were well tolerated; no subjects experienced serious adverse events. These results demonstrate the lower oral abuse potential of chewed and intact oxycodone DETERx than crushed immediate‐release oxycodone.

Objective. Evaluate the human abuse potential (HAP) of an experimental, microsphere-in-capsule formulation of extended-release oxycodone (oxycodone DETERx®) (herein “DETERx”).Design. Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, positive- and placebo-controlled, single-dose, four-phase, four-treatment, crossover study.Setting. Clinical research site.Subjects. There were 39 qualifying subjects (72% male, 85% white, mean age of 27 years) with 36 completing all four Double-blind Treatment Periods.Methods. The four phases encompassed: 1) Screening; 2) Drug Discrimination; 3) Double-blind Treatment; and 4) Follow-up. Drug Discrimination tests ensured that subjects could distinguish placebo from opioid. The four Double-blind Treatments compared DETERx—administered as either a crushed intranasal (IN) or an intact oral (PO) preparation—with immediate-release oxycodone IN (OXY-IR IN) and with an intact IN and PO placebo DETERx control.Results. For primary pharmacokinetic (PK) assessments, abuse quotient (Cmax/Tmax) was lower with DETERx IN than DETERx PO; both treatments were substantially lower than OXY-IR IN (6.24, 8.60, and 69.6 ng/mL/h, respectively). For drug liking, the primary subjective pharmacodynamic (PD) endpoint, both DETERx IN and DETERx PO produced significantly lower scores than OXY-IR IN (P ≤ 0.0001 for each); DETERx IN was less liked than DETERx PO (P ≤ 0.05), mirroring the PK relationships. Objectively assessed pupillometry corroborated the more rapid and significantly greater effect of OXY-IR IN than either DETERx IN or DETERx PO (P ≤ 0.007 for each). Overall safety profiles of DETERx and OXY-IR were comparable and both were well tolerated.Conclusions. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic outcomes suggest that DETERx IN has relatively low HAP; continued research in larger populations is suggested.

Aim:To further characterize the pharmacokinetics of Xtampza R ER. Subjects & methods:This was an openlabel, randomized, active-controlled, five-treatment, five-period, naltrexone-blocked, cross-over study. Healthy subjects received five equivalent oxycodone doses: Xtampza ER (intact or crushed), OxyContin R (intact or crushed) or immediate-release (IR) oxycodone (crushed). Blood samples were collected to assess oxycodone concentrations. Results: Crushed and intact Xtampza ER resulted in lower peak plasma concentrations compared with crushed oxycodone IR; crushed and intact Xtampza ER were bioequivalent. Crushed OxyContin exhibited a rapid increase in plasma oxycodone and was bioequivalent to crushed oxycodone IR. Conclusion: This second pharmacokinetic study demonstrated that Xtampza ER maintains its ER properties after crushing, unlike OxyContin, which failed to retain its ER properties after crushing.