No abstract

Congress and many state legislatures are considering expanding access to telemedicine. To inform this debate, we analyzed Medicare fee-for-service claims for the period 2004-14 to understand trends in and recent use of telemedicine for mental health care, also known as telemental health. The study population consisted of rural beneficiaries with a diagnosis of any mental illness or serious mental illness. The number of telemental health visits grew on average 45.1 percent annually, and by 2014 there were 5.3 and 11.8 telemental health visits per 100 rural beneficiaries with any mental illness or serious mental illness, respectively. There was notable variation across states: In 2014 nine had more than twenty-five visits per 100 beneficiaries with serious mental illness, while four states and the District of Columbia had none. Compared to other beneficiaries with mental illness, beneficiaries who received a telemental health visit were more likely to be younger than sixty-five, be eligible for Medicare because of disability, and live in a relatively poor community. States with a telemedicine parity law and a pro-telemental health regulatory environment had significantly higher rates of telemental health use than those that did not.

No abstract

When coupled with management of care, implementation of parity in insurance benefits for behavioral health care can improve insurance protection without increasing total costs.

Only a small proportion of individuals with a substance use disorder (SUD) receive treatment. The shortage of SUD providers, particularly in rural areas, is an important driver of this treatment gap. Telemedicine could be a means of expanding access to SUD treatment. However, several key regulatory and reimbursement barriers to greater tele-SUD use exist, and both the Congress and the states are considering or have recently passed legislation to address these barriers. To inform these efforts, we describe how tele-SUD is currently being used. Using 2010–2017 claims data from a large commercial insurer, we identify characteristics of tele-SUD users and examine how tele-SUD is being used in conjunction with in-person SUD care. Despite a rapid increase in tele-SUD over the period, we find low use rates overall, particularly relative to the growth in tele-mental health. Tele-SUD is primarily being used as a complement to in-person care and is disproportionately used by those with relatively severe SUD. Given the severity of the opioid epidemic, the low-rates of tele-SUD use that we observe represent a missed opportunity. As availability of tele-SUD is expanded, it will be important to monitor closely which tele-SUD delivery models are being deployed and their impact on access and outcomes.

Objective-The goal of this study was to characterize racial-ethnic differences in mental health care utilization associated with postpartum depression in a multiethnic cohort of Medicaid recipients.Methods-In a retrospective cohort study, administrative claims data from New Jersey's Medicaid program were obtained for 29,601 women (13,001 whites, 13,416 blacks, and 3,184 Latinas) who delivered babies between July 2004 and October 2007. Racial-ethnic differences were estimated with logistic regression for initiation of antidepressant medication or outpatient mental health visits within six months of delivery, follow-up (a prescription refill or second visit), and continued mental health care (at least three visits or three filled antidepressant prescriptions within 120 days).Results-Nine percent (N=1,120) of white women initiated postpartum mental health care, compared with 4% (N=568) of black women and 5% (N=162) of Latinas. With analyses controlling for clinical factors, the odds of initiating treatment after delivery were significantly (p<.001) lower for blacks (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=.43) and Latinas (AOR=.59) compared with whites. Among those who initiated treatment, blacks and Latinas were less likely than whites to receive follow-up treatment (blacks, AOR=.66, p<.001; Latinas, AOR=.67, p<.05) or continued care (blacks, AOR=.81, marginal difference at p<.10; Latinas, AOR=.67, p<.05). Among those who initiated antidepressant treatment, black women and Latinas were less likely than whites to refill a prescription.Conclusions-There were significant racial-ethnic differences in depression-related mental health care after delivery. Suboptimal treatment was prevalent among all low-income women in the study. However, racial and ethnic disparities in the initiation and continuation of postpartum depression care were particularly troubling and warrant clinical and policy attention.Postpartum depression is a serious and debilitating illness that affects appproximately 10%-20% of women who give birth (1). Available evidence suggests that rates of postpartum disclosures The authors report no competing interests. NIH Public Access NIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript depression do not differ by race and ethnicity, but it does not conclusively demonstrate equal rates of illness across groups. Studies in which low-income mothers were systematically screened for clinical criteria indicate that rates of depression during the postpartum period are similar among Latinas, black women, and white women-8% for major depressive disorder and 23% for all depressive disorders in the first three months after delivery (2,3). Effective screening tools and treatment strategies for combating postpartum depression have been developed (4,5). However, detection and treatment rates for this condition are low (6-8), particularly among high-risk women (9). Untreated postpartum depression can have severe impacts on the health and well-being of the affected woman and her family, including long-term ...

An October 1998 Hartford Courant investigative series highlighted alleged cases of brutality and death suffered by involuntarily secluded, restrained, and/or emergently medicated patients. The resulting public and professional furor prompted a spate of new federal regulations and legislative initiatives setting national standards for reporting and clinical oversight. These events provide stimulus for this literature review. Rates, duration, and methods of seclusion and restraint still vary widely. Little evidence is available to guide clinical practice regarding relative benefits and risks of various methods to control acute adult patient aggression; even less evidence exists in child and adolescent populations. Further efficacy and effectiveness studies are needed to address this issue. Various programmatic efforts successfully reduce seclusion and restraint-at times dramatically-and can be used as examples of systematic quality improvement so "best practices" may evolve and spread throughout psychiatric inpatient settings.

Drs Huskamp and Mehrotra had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.