Background: Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can induce acute respiratory distress, which is characterized by tachypnea, hypoxia, and dyspnea. Intubation and mechanical ventilation are strategic treatments for COVID-19 distress or hypoxia. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases to identify relevant randomized control trials, observational studies, and case series published from April 1, 2021. Results: 24 studies were included in this review. Studies had been conducted in the USA, China, Spain, South Korea, Italy, Iran, and Brazil. Most patients had been intubated in the intensive care unit. Rapid sequence induction had been mostly used for intubation. ROX index can be utilized as the predictor of the necessity of intubation in COVID-19 patients. According to the studies, the rate of intubation was 5 to 88%. It was revealed that 1.4 - 44.5% of patients might be extubated. Yet obesity and age (elderly) are the only risk factors of delayed or difficult extubation. Discussion and Conclusions: Acute respiratory distress in COVID-19 patients could require endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. Severe respiratory distress, loss of consciousness, and hypoxia had been the most important reasons for intubation. Also, increased levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, d-dimer, and lipase in combination with hypoxia are correlated with intubation. Old age, diabetes mellitus, respiratory rate, increased level of CRP, bicarbonate level, and oxygen saturation are the most valuable predictors of the need for mechanical ventilation. ICU admission mortality following intubation was found to be 15 to 36%. Awake-prone positioning in comparison with high-flow nasal oxygen therapy did not reduce the risk of intubation and mechanical ventilation. There was no association between intubation timing and mortality of the infected patients. Noninvasive ventilation may have survival benefits.

Background. Malnutrition in COVID-19 critically ill patients can lead to poor prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate the association between nutritional status (or risk) and the prognosis of critically ill COVID-19 patients. In this study, prognosis is the primary outcome of “hospital mortality” patients. The second outcome is defined as “need for mechanical ventilation.” Methods and Materials. In this single-center prospective cohort study, 110 patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit of Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex (Tehran, Iran) between April and September 2021 were enrolled. Participants formed a consecutive sample. MNA-SF, NRS-2002, mNUTRIC, and PNI scores were used to evaluate nutritional assessment. Patients’ lab results and pulse oximetric saturation SpO2/FiO2 (SF) ratio at the time of intensive care unit (ICU) admission were collected. Patients were screened for nutritional status and categorized into two groups, patients at nutritional risk and nonrisk. Results. Sixty-five (59.1%) of all patients were men. The overall range of age was 52 ± 15. Thirty-six (32.7%) of patients were obese (BMI ≥ 30). The hospital mortality rate was 59.1% (n = 65). According to the different criteria, malnutrition rate was 67.3% (n = 74) (NRS), 28.2% (n = 31) (MNA), 34.5% (n = 38) (mNUTRIC), and 58.2% (n = 64) (PNI). There was a statistically significant association between chronic kidney disease (CKD) and mNUTRIC risk (OR = 13.5, 95% CI (1.89–16.05), P = 0.002 ), diabetes mellitus (DM) and MNA risk (OR = 2.82, 95% CI (1.01–7.83), P = 0.041 ), hypertension (HTN) and MNA risk (OR = 5.63, 95% CI (2.26–14.05), P < 0.001 ), and malignancy and mNUTRIC risk ( P = 0.048 ). The nutritional risk (all tools) significantly increased the odds of in-hospital death and need for mechanical ventilation. The length of stay was not significantly different in malnourished patients. Conclusion. In the critical care setting of COVID-19 patients, malnutrition is prevalent. Malnutrition (nutritional risk) is associated with an increased risk of need for mechanical ventilation and in-hospital mortality. Patients with a history of HTN, CKD, DM, and cancer are more likely to be at nutritional risk at the time of ICU admission.

Background: Challenges concerning patient management exist worldwide, particularly in the critical care. In this review, we have summarized some studies regarding respiratory physiotherapy and exercise in COVID-19 patients. Methods: For searching related articles, PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and the Web of Science databases were used. Keywords such as "respiratory physiotherapy" and "COVID-19," "exercise," "effect of exercise in COVID-19," and "respiratory physiotherapy for COVID-19 in ICU" were used to identify related papers until December 2021. The abstracts and entire texts were evaluated by 3 separate reviewers. Results: During the symptomatic phase, individuals may benefit from brief durations of bed rest. Exercise appears to provide both emotional and physical benefits for individuals in the early stages of infection. As a result, it may lower viral load, minimize cytokine storm, shorten the acute phase, and expedite recovery. Mild exercise may also increase the autophagy pathway, which improves the immune system function in response to COVID-19 infection. Keeping this in mind, intense activity, especially without the guidance of an expert physical therapist, is not advantageous during the inflammatory period and may even be regarded a second hit phenomenon. Mild exercises during bed rest (e.g., acute phase) may reduce the risk of pulmonary capillary coagulation and deep vein thrombosis. Conclusion: Although respiratory physiotherapy and prone positioning in hospitalized patients, particularly in critical care, can be challenging for medical staff, they are cost-effective and noninvasive approaches for COVID-19 patients. Early physiotherapy and muscle training exercise for patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) seems to be beneficial for patients and may reduce bed rest-induced weakness, improve oxygenation, and reduce length of stay. Finally, breathing exercises can improve some symptoms of COVID-19, like dyspnea and weakness.

Background: Severe COVID-19 disease could induce acute respiratory distress which is characterized by tachypnea, hypoxia, and dyspnea. Intubation and mechanical ventilation are a strategic treatment of COVID-19 distress or hypoxia. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases through April 1, 2021, to identify relevant randomized control trials, observational studies, and case series. Results: 24 studies were included in this review. Studies were conducted in the USA, China, Spain, South Korea, Italy, Iran, and Brazil. Most patients were intubated in the intensive care unit. Rapid sequence induction was mostly used for intubation. ROX index might be utilized for the predictor of the necessity of intubation in COVID-19 patients. According to the previous studies the rate of intubation reported 5 to 88%. It was revealed that 1.4 - 44.5% of patients might be extubated. Yet obesity and age (elderly) are the only risk factors of delayed or difficult extubation. Discussion and conclusion: Acute respiratory distress in COVID-19 patients could require endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. Severe respiratory distress, loss of consciousness, and hypoxia were the most important reasons for intubation. Also, increased levels of ferritin, d-dimer, and lipase in common with hypoxia are correlated with intubation and ICU admission Mortality following intubation is reported to be 15 to 36%. Awake-prone positioning in comparison to high-flow nasal oxygen therapy did not reduce the risk of intubation and mechanical ventilation. There was no association between intubation timing and mortality of infected patients. noninvasive ventilation may have survival benefits. Keywords: Intubation, COVID-19, critical care, respiratory disease, infectious disease, hypoxia, airway management.

No abstract