Public policies are fundamental to innovation because they establish guidelines to encourage the development of a region and nation. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the differences and similarities between two policies of global development-the Goal 9' of Agenda 2030 and the Brazilian National Science, Technology and Innovation Strategy 2016-2022. We focused on the presence or the absence of incentives for open innovation, especially with the adoption of Hackathon, Bootcamp and Crowdfunding practices. The methodology involved a comparative study between Goal 9' of Agenda 2030 and the Brazilian National Science, Technology and Innovation Strategy 2016-2022. We used the Content Analysis method to evaluate both of those policies based on the Categorical Analysis technique. As a result, we found that both policies encourage open innovation practices, but Hackathon, Bootcamp and Crowdfunding strategies are not explicitly discussed in these policies. Resumen: Las políticas públicas son fundamentales para la innovación porque establecen directrices para fomentar el desarrollo de una región y una nación. El propósito de este artículo es analizar las diferencias y similitudes entre dos políticas de desarrollo global:
This article aims to analyze the impact that crowdfunding can have on Brazil 's innovative activity, and how governmental innovation policies approach the theme. For that, an analysis of governmental policies for Science, Technology and Innovation in Brazil regarding the financing modalities of the innovative activity, in particular crowdfunding, is presented. For the analysis of the data we opted for the application of the content analysis method. The results show that the policies analyzed focus on financing by governmental agencies, therefore other financing modalities, especially crowdfunding, can be better exploited.RESUMOO presente artigo objetiva analisar o impacto que o crowdfunding pode exercer na atividade inovativa do Brasil, e de que maneira as políticas públicas de inovação abordam o tema. Para tanto se apresenta uma análise de políticas públicas de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação brasileiras no que tange a modalidades de financiamento da atividade inovativa, em especial o crowdfunding. Para a análise dos dados optou-se pela aplicação do método análise de conteúdo. Como resultados, observou-se que as políticas analisadas se concentram no financiamento por agentes da esfera pública, porquanto outras modalidades de financiamento, em especial o crowdfunding, podem ser melhor exploradas.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.