No abstract

During a disaster or prolonged power outage, individuals who use electricity-dependent medical equipment are often unable to operate it and seek care in acute care settings or local shelters. Public health officials often report that they do not have proactive and systematic ways to rapidly identify and assist these individuals. In June 2013, we piloted a first-in-the-nation emergency preparedness drill in which we used Medicare claims data to identify individuals with electricity-dependent durable medical equipment during a disaster and securely disclosed it to a local health department. We found that Medicare claims data were 93% accurate in identifying individuals using a home oxygen concentrator or ventilator. The drill findings suggest that claims data can be useful in improving preparedness and response for electricity-dependent populations.

Introduction: IDegLira is a fixed-ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide indicated for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). We report the first real-world study describing change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) among US patients who initiated IDegLira. The aim of the study was to observe and describe changes in glycemic control and weight in patients initiating IDegLira in real-world clinical practice. Methods: Patients in the Practice Fusion electronic medical record database who initiated treatment with IDegLira between March 2017 and June 2018 were identified (n = 1384). To be included in the analyses, the study population needed to meet age, time in database pre-and post-initiation, and availability of HbA1c data at baseline and follow-up requirements. Data were analyzed according to baseline therapy subgroups and whether patients were intensifying (primary analysis group) or simplifying (secondary analysis group) their diabetes treatment. Changes in clinical outcomes from baseline were evaluated by paired t tests and linear regression. Results: The overall study population comprised 296 patients, of whom 206 were included in the primary analysis group and 90 were included in the secondary analysis group. In the adjusted analyses, there was a reduction in HbA1c of-1.1% in the primary analysis group, with the HbA1c reduction in all prior therapy groups ranging from-0.8% for those previously on basal insulin to-1.0% for those previously on non-injectable therapy (p \ 0.0001 for all). In a similar adjusted analysis, there was a statistically significant but small (1.0 lb/0.45 kg) change in weight in the primary analysis group. In the secondary analysis, patients previously on more than one injection daily switched to a more simplified therapy without compromising on glycemic control (HbA1c change of-0.16%). Conclusion: Consistent with previous realworld studies, IDegLira lowered HbA1c across different background prior glucose-lowering therapies, with minimal impact on weight.

Background: Few head-to-head comparisons have been performed on the real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 booster vaccines. We evaluated the relative effectiveness (rVE) of a primary series of mRNA-1273 versus BNT162b2 and Ad26.COV2.S and a homologous mRNA booster against medically-attended, outpatient, and hospitalized COVID-19. Methods: A dataset linking primary care electronic medical records with medical claims data was used for this retrospective cohort study of US patients ≥18 years vaccinated with a primary series between February and October 2021 (Part 1) and a homologous mRNA booster between October 2021 and January 2022 (Part 2). Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were derived from 1:1 matching adjusted across potential covariates. rVE was (1-HRadjusted) x 100. Additional analysis was performed across regions and age groups. Results: Following adjustment, Part 1 rVE for mRNA-1273 versus BNT162b2 was 23% (95% CI: 22%-25%), 23% (22%-25%), and 19% (14%-24%) whilst the rVE for mRNA-1273 versus Ad26.COV2.S was 50% (48%-51%), 50% (48%-52%), and 57% (53%-61%) against any medically-attended, outpatient, and hospitalized COVID-19, respectively. The adjusted rVE in Part 2 for mRNA-1273 versus BNT162b2 was 14% (10%-18%), 13% (8%-17%), and 19% (1%-34%) against any medically-attended, outpatient, and hospitalized COVID-19, respectively. rVE against medically-attended COVID-19 was higher in adults ≥65 years (35%; 24%-47%) than those 18-64 years (13%; 9%-17%) after the booster. Conclusions: In this study, mRNA-1273 was more effective than BNT162b2 or Ad26.COV2.S following primary series during a Delta-dominant period, and than BNT162b2 as a booster during an Omicron-dominant period.

Background: Erenumab, a monoclonal antibody (mAb) developed to block the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor, is approved for the prevention of migraine in adults. This retrospective observational study sought to describe early real-world use of erenumab. Methods: This study used the Practice Fusion ambulatory Electronic Health Record database, which represents approximately 6% of ambulatory care among primary care and specialist practices in the United States. Among migraine patients initiating erenumab, demographics, migraine type, comorbidities, and prior treatments were assessed during the 12-month baseline period. Treatment patterns including changes in acute and preventive medications, switches to other CGRP mAbs (fremanezumab and galcanezumab), and for erenumab, changes in dose and adherence were examined among patients with 6 months of follow-up. Results: Of 3,336 patients identified (85.9% female; mean age = 49.1 years), approximately 40% had documentation of chronic migraine. Common comorbidities included non-migraine headache, anxiety, depression, and hypertension. Most patients (76.3%) initiated on the 70 mg dose of erenumab. Among 1,638 patients included in the treatment pattern analysis, 53.1% used acute medications and 55.7% used other non-specific preventive migraine medications during follow-up, reductions of 9.8% and 10.2%, respectively, over the same period of time before index. Switching to fremanezumab and galcanezumab were observed in 12.2% and 13.8% of patients, respectively. The mean proportion of days covered by erenumab at 6 months was 79%. Dosage of erenumab increased (from 70 mg to 140 mg) in 13.0% and decreased (from 140 mg to 70 mg) in 24.9% of patients. Conclusion: This early real-world study showed high adherence among erenumab users. This combined with observed reductions in previously used acute and preventive medications are suggestive of erenumab’s benefit.