No abstract

: Approximately 21 million people in the United States have a substance use disorder (SUD); the number of family members impacted by a loved one's SUD is exponentially greater. Affected family members of individuals with SUDs are at high risk for developing chronic medical and psychiatric health conditions, are high utilizers of the health care system, and have high health care expenditures. Family members play a central role in the lives of many individuals with SUDs; information given to family members can have a significant impact on persons with addiction and therefore the SUD treatment that an individual might receive. Evidence-based interventions targeting affected family members have been shown to: improve health outcomes for all family members, result in better addiction treatment outcomes, and prevent adolescent substance use. Despite mounting evidence, the health care system has been hesitant to engage families in a meaningful way. Health care providers should consider how implicit and explicit assumptions about the role of family members in SUD development, treatment, and recovery may contribute to this underlying reluctance. Antiquated policies and procedures that alienate family members should be modified (e.g., limiting phone access). Family members have a right to receive professional treatment and to be educated about the difference between mutual/peer support and evidence-based treatment options. Despite the potential for family members to move the needle on the country's current addiction crisis they remain an underutilized resource. A paradigm shift will be required to get the current SUD care continuum to adopt a family-centric model.

Although people with HIV infection (PLWH) are at higher risk of polypharmacy and substance use, there is limited knowledge about potential harms associated with polypharmacy such as falls and fractures in this population. The study objective was to determine whether polypharmacy, as measured by the number and type of medication, is associated with falls and fractures among PLWH and DSM-IV substance dependence in the past year or ever injection drug use (IDU). We identified the number of medications by electronic medical record review in the following categories: (i) systemically active, (ii) non-antiretroviral (non-ARV), (iii) sedating, (iv) non-sedating as well as any opioid medication and any non-opioid sedating medication. Outcomes were self-reported (1) fall/accident requiring medical attention and (2) fracture in the previous year. Separate logistic regression models were fitted for medications in each category and each outcome. Among 250 participants, the odds of a fall requiring medical attention were higher with each additional medication overall (odds ratio [OR] 1.12, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] = 1.05, 1.18), each additional non-ARV medication (OR 1.13, 95%CI = 1.06, 1.20), each additional sedating medication (OR 1.36, 95%CI = 1.14, 1.62), and a non-opioid sedating medication (OR 2.89, 95%CI = 1.06, 7.85) but not with an additional non-sedating medication or opioid medication. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses, optimal cutoffs for predicting falls were: ≥8 overall and ≥2 sedating medications. Odds ratios for fracture in the previous year were OR 1.05, 95%CI = 0.97, 1.13 for each additional medication overall and OR 1.11, 95%CI = 0.89, 1.38 for each additional sedating medication. In PLWH and substance dependence or ever IDU, a higher number of medications was associated with greater odds of having a fall requiring medical attention. The association appeared to be driven largely by sedating medications. Future studies should determine if reducing such polypharmacy, particularly sedating medications, lowers the risk of falls.

People living with HIV (PLWH) on antiretroviral therapy (ART) who use substances were examined to (a) describe those with virologic control and (b) determine which substance use-factors are associated with lack of virologic control. Participants were adult PLWH taking ART with either past 12-month DSM-IV substance dependence or past 30-day alcohol or illicit drug use. Substance use factors included number of DSM-IV alcohol or drug dependence criteria and past 30-day specific substance use. Associations with HIV viral load (HVL) (<200 vs. ≥200 copies/mL) were tested using logistic regression models. Multivariable analyses adjusted for age, sex, homelessness and anxiety or depression. Participants (n = 202) were median age 50 years, 66% male, 51% African American and 75% self-reported ≥90% past 30-day ART adherence. Though HVL suppression (HVL <200 copies/mL) was achieved in 78% (158/202), past 30-day substance use was common among this group: 77% cigarette use; 51% heavy alcohol use; 50% marijuana; 27% cocaine; 16% heroin; and 15% illicit prescription opioid use. After adjusting for covariates, specific substance use was not associated with a detectable HVL, however number of past 12-month DSM-IV drug dependence criteria was (adjusted odds ratio = 1.23 for each additional criterion, 95% CI: 1.04–1.46). Three-quarters of a substance-using cohort of PLWH receiving ART had virologic control and ≥90% ART adherence. Substance dependence criteria (particularly drug dependence), not specifically substance use, were associated with lack of virologic control. Optimal HIV outcomes can be achieved by individuals who use alcohol or drugs and addressing symptoms of substance dependence may improve HIV-related outcomes.