Summary Propellants have been used in oil and gas wells to assist with perforating and creating near-wellbore stimulation. Propellants are electrically ignited in the wellbore at the perforated interval. Upon ignition, they rapidly create a large amount of gas, and the pressurization leads to breakdown of the formation. It has been postulated that the pressurization leads to creation of multiple fractures in the formation. This paper describes an experimental study with a new propellant and aims to understand the pattern of fracture creation with these propellants. The results are also compared with an older generation of propellant tested by Wieland et al. (2006). A large-scale laboratory test was performed in a sandstone block (30×30×54 in.) with a 2-in.-diameter vertical centralized wellbore extending the full block height. The block was loaded in a polyaxial stress frame. A propellant cartridge was positioned in the center of the wellbore. Small holes were drilled in the rock to intersect the expected primary fracture and were instrumented with high-resolution pressure gauges to enable fracture-timing and -growth-rate analysis. Anisotropic stresses representative of field conditions were applied on the block, and the wellbore was pressurized before ignition. The propellant ignition produced an initial peak pressure of 5,790 psi in 1.4 ms followed by an oscillatory pattern of pressure increase to a maximum pressure of 6,660 psi before decaying because of fracture growth and gas leakoff. The block was removed from the test frame and cut vertically and horizontally to examine the fracture pattern generated by the propellant. A dominant planar fracture was observed on either side of the wellbore, which propagated in the direction perpendicular to the minimum-horizontal-stress direction. It was verified that the propellant had a much-higher burn rate than the propellant tested by Wieland et al. (2006). The large-scale block test provides critical insights and data that can serve as inputs to calibrate physics-based models for modeling propellant ignition and stimulation. The results help in understanding the benefits and limitations of using propellants for stimulation.
Propellants have been utilized in oil and gas wells to assist with perforating and creating near wellbore stimulation. Propellants are electrically ignited in the wellbore at the perforated interval. Upon ignition they rapidly create a large amount of gas and the pressurization leads to breakdown of the formation. It has been postulated that the pressurization leads to creation of multiple fractures in the formation. This paper describes an experimental study with a new propellant and aims to understand the pattern of fracture creation with these propellants. The results are also compared to an older generation of propellant tested by Wieland et al. 2006 (SPE 102907). A large scale laboratory test was performed in a sandstone block (30″ × 30″ × 54″) with a 2″ diameter vertical centralized wellbore extending the full block height. The block was loaded in a poly-axial stress frame. A proppellant cartridge was positioned in the center of the wellbore. Small holes were drilled in the rock to intersect the expected primary fracture and instrumented with high resolution pressure gauges to enable fracture timing and growth rate analysis. Anisotropic stresses representative of field conditions were applied on the block and the wellbore was pressurized prior to ignition. The propellant ignition produced an initial peak pressure of 5,790psi in 1.4 milliseconds followed by saw tooth pattern of pressure increase to a maximum pressure of 6,600psi before decaying due to fracture growth and gas leak-off. The block was removed from the test frame and cut vertically and horizontally to examine the fracture pattern generated by the propellant. A dominant planar fracture was observed on either side of the wellbore which propagated in the direction perpendicular to the minimum horizontal stress direction. It was verified that the propellant had much higher burn rate than the propellant tested by Wieland et al. (2006). The large block test provides critical insights and data which can serve as important inputs to calibrate physics based models utilized for modeling propellant ignition and stimulation. The results help in understanding the benefits and limitations of using propellants for stimulation.
En estas Correspondencias, y con motivo del centenario del Concurso de Cante Jondo de Granada celebrado en 1922, hemos decidido invitar a cuatro autoras flamencas a co-responder y dialogar con Manuel de Falla e Ignacio Zuloaga a partir del epistolario publicado por el Ayuntamiento de Granada en 1982 con epílogo y edición de Federico Sopeña2. Esta comunicación interdimensional ha abierto interesantes y sugerentes líneas de pensamiento que, sin duda, amplían las posibilidades hermenéuticas de un acontecimiento tan oportuno y acorde con su momento como inquisitorial –usando el término de José Luis Ortiz Nuevo– e impreciso en lo que se refiere a la realidad histórica y musical de lo flamenco.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.