In 2016, the Transplantation Society of Australia and New Zealand, with the support of the Australian Government Organ and Tissue authority, commissioned a literature review on the topic of infectious disease transmission from deceased donors to recipients of solid organ transplants. The purpose of this review was to synthesize evidence on transmission risks, diagnostic test characteristics, and recipient management to inform best-practice clinical guidelines. The final review, presented as a special supplement in Transplantation Direct, collates case reports of transmission events and other peer-reviewed literature, and summarizes current (as of June 2017) international guidelines on donor screening and recipient management. Of particular interest at the time of writing was how to maximize utilization of donors at increased risk for transmission of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, and hepatitis B virus, given the recent developments, including the availability of direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus and improvements in donor screening technologies. The review also covers emerging risks associated with recent epidemics (eg, Zika virus) and the risk of transmission of nonendemic pathogens related to donor travel history or country of origin. Lastly, the implications for recipient consent of expanded utilization of donors at increased risk of blood-borne viral disease transmission are considered.

Despite the dominant role of community-acquired respiratory viruses as etiological agents of disease, there has been little focus to date on the translation of rapidly developing diagnostic modalities, such as next-generation sequencing techniques in the examination of lower respiratory tract samples. When applied, these techniques should inform strategies to both understand the nexus between health and disease states of the respiratory virome, and drive a paradigm shift in how the practicing pulmonologist views the conceptual framework of respiratory infections. The lower respiratory tract was once thought to be a sanctuary site from microbiological colonization owing to the efficacy of upper airway-protective mechanisms and the host mucosal barrier function of the lower airways, combined with both innate and adaptive immune responses. As a small number of recent studies confirm, this is a naive vision of the lung, the viral component of which parallels recent revelations from respiratory microbiome studies. Hence, it is now timely to revise our thinking regarding the constituents, diversity, and changing nature of the respiratory virome in health and disease. One area worthy of focus is the interface between community-acquired respiratory viruses and the respiratory virome to better understand the dynamics in acute infection, as well as the factors that may lead to viral persistence and chronic disease. Given recent advances in metagenomics, the tools are now at hand to accomplish these goals.

Once considered a sterile site below the larynx, the tracheobronchial tree and parenchyma of the lungs are now known to harbor a rich diversity of microbial species including bacteria, viruses, fungi, and archaea. Many of these organisms, particularly the viruses which comprise the human respiratory virome, have not been identified, so their true role is unknown. It seems logical to conclude that a "healthy" respiratory microbiome exists which may be modified in disease states and perhaps by therapies such as antibiotics, antifungals, and antiviral treatments. It is likely that there is a critical relationship or equilibrium between components of the microbiome until such time as perturbations occur which lead to a state of dysbiosis or an "unhealthy" microbiome. The act of lung transplantation provides an extreme change to an individual's respiratory microbiome as, in effect, the donor respiratory microbiome is transplanted into the recipient. The mandatory ex-vivo period of the donor lungs appears to be associated with blooms of resident viral species in particular. Subsequently, allograft injury, rejection, and immune suppressive therapy all combine to create periods of dysbiosis which when combined with transient infections such as community acquired respiratory viruses may facilitate the development of chronic allograft dysfunction in predisposed individuals. As our understanding of the respiratory microbiome is rapidly expanding, based on the use of new-generation sequencing tools in particular, it is to be hoped that insights gained into the subtle relationship between the microbiome and the lung allograft will facilitate improved outcomes by directing novel therapeutic endeavors.

BackgroundBronchiectasis is a chronic respiratory condition. Persistent bacterial colonisation in the stable state with increased and sometimes altered bacterial burden during exacerbations are accepted as key features in the pathophysiology. The extent to which respiratory viruses are present during stable periods and in exacerbations is less well understood.MethodsThis study aimed to determine the incidence of respiratory viruses within a cohort of bronchiectasis patients with acute exacerbations at a teaching hospital and, separately, in a group of patients with stable bronchiectasis. In the group of stable patients, a panel of respiratory viruses were assayed for using real time quantitative PCR in respiratory secretions and exhaled breath. The Impact of virus detection on exacerbation rates and development of symptomatic infection was evaluated.ResultsRoutine hospital-based viral PCR testing was only requested in 28% of admissions for an exacerbation. In our cohort of stable bronchiectasis patients, viruses were detected in 92% of patients during the winter season, and 33% of patients during the summer season. In the 2-month follow up period, 2 of 27 patients presented with an exacerbation.ConclusionsThis pilot study demonstrated that respiratory viruses are commonly detected in patients with stable bronchiectasis. They are frequently detected during asymptomatic viral periods, and multiple viruses are often present concurrently.

No abstract

One of the great challenges of lung transplantation is to bridge the dichotomy between supply and demand of donor organs so that the maximum number of potential recipients achieve a meaningful benefit in improvements in survival and quality of life. To achieve this laudable goal is predicated on choosing candidates who are sufficiently unwell, in fact possessing a terminal respiratory illness, but otherwise fit and able to undergo major surgery and a prolonged recuperation and rehabilitation stage combined with ongoing adherence to complex medical therapies. The choice of potential candidate and the timing of that referral is at times perhaps more art than science, but there are a number of solid guidelines for specific illnesses to assist the interested clinician. In this regard, the relationship between the referring clinician and the lung transplant unit is a critical one. It is an ongoing and dynamic process of education and two way communication, which is a marker of the professionalism of a highly performing unit. Lung transplantation is ultimately a team effort where the recipient is the key player. That principle has been enshrined in the three consensus position statements regarding selection criteria for lung and heart-lung transplantation promulgated by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation over the last two decades. During this period, the number of indications for lung transplantation have broadened and the number of contraindications reduced. Risk management is paramount in the pre- and perioperative period to effect early successful outcomes. While it is not the province of this review to reiterate the detailed listing of those factors, an overview position will be developed that describes the rationale and evidence for selected criteria where that exists. Importantly, the authors will attempt to provide an historical and experiential basis for making these important and life-determining decisions. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplementary material section.

There have been great advances in the methodologies available for the detection of respiratory viruses. Accompanying this, our knowledge surrounding the impact of these viruses has also made a great leap forward. We have come a long way from the once commonly accepted belief that the lower respiratory tract was sterile and that the detection of any microbial species must represent a breach in host defence and likely be associated with symptomatic infection. With the advent of molecular detection techniques and improvements in sequencing-based methodologies to make these tools more accessible and cost effective, we now know that there is an abundant and diverse ecosystem within the lower-respiratory tract. This chapter will outline the clinical impact of the human respiratory virome, techniques for sampling the lower respiratory tract, the evolution of the diagnostic tools available, and the current limitations in our instruments and knowledge in this area. The human respiratory virome is an exciting new area of research that will continue to grow with the aid of the methodologies outlined in the following chapters and the advent of even more efficient tools in the future.

Respiratory viruses are very common in the community and contribute to the burden of illness for patients with chronic respiratory diseases, including acute exacerbations. Traditional sampling methods are invasive and problematic to repeat. Accordingly, we explored whether respiratory viruses could be isolated from disposable spirometry filters and whether detection of viruses in this context represented presence in the upper or lower respiratory tract. Discovery (n  =  53) and validation (n  =  49) cohorts were recruited from a hospital outpatient department during two different time periods. Spirometry mouthpiece filters were collected from all participants. Respiratory secretions were sampled from the upper and lower respiratory tract by nasal washing (NW), sputum, and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). All samples were examined using RT-PCR to identify a panel of respiratory viruses (rhinovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, influenza A, influenza B, parainfluenza virus 1, 2 & 3, and human metapneumovirus). Rhinovirus was quantified using qPCR. Paired filter-NW samples (n  =  29), filter-sputum samples (n  =  24), filter-BAL samples (n  =  39) and filter-NW-BAL samples (n  =  10) provided a range of comparisons. At least one virus was detected in any sample in 85% of participants in the discovery cohort versus 45% in the validation cohort. Overall, 72% of viruses identified in the paired comparator method matched those detected in spirometry filters. There was a high correlation between viruses identified in spirometry filters compared with viruses identified in both the upper and lower respiratory tract using traditional sampling methods. Our results suggest that examination of spirometry filters may be a novel and inexpensive sampling method for the presence of respiratory viruses in exhaled breath.