The introduction of genomics practice within public health departments has provided access to comprehensive cancer care for uninsured individuals. The successful implementation of the B-RST into public health centers demonstrates the opportunity for integration of HBOC screening into primary care practices.

Background The Georgia Breast Cancer Genomics Project identifed minority and underserved women at high risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer based on family history. Education, web-based screening, genetic counseling, and testing were provided in public health and primary care settings in accordance with evidence-based recommendations and guidelines. Objectives To assess risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) among minority and underserved women, provide genetic services according to evidence-based guidelines, and evaluate provider knowledge of HBOC. Methods The Georgia Department of Public Health established this project through a cooperative agreement with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HBOC screening and genetic services were provided in 13 public health centers and federally qualifed health centers. Staff received training on genetics and risk assessment using the Breast Cancer Genetics Referral Screening Tool (B-RST). Providers and medical residents were surveyed on their knowledge of HBOC. Young women with breast cancer were surveyed on receipt of genetic services. Results More than 5,400 women were successfully screened; 79% identifed as racial/ethnic minorities. 5% of women screened positive on the B-RST, which is consistent with HBOC prevalence; 79% agreed to follow up. 23% met criteria for increased risk of BRCA 1/2 mutation and received genetic counseling and testing. Surveys revealed profound gaps in knowledge among physicians and medical residents and lack of delivery of evidence-based genetic services to survivors. Conclusions The genomics project demonstrated the effcacy of population-based screening to identify high-risk women before they receive a diagnosis of cancer. A high percentage of women who screened positive also completed genetic counseling and testing. Access to the benefts of HBOC management to prevent cancer and decrease mortality among minority and underserved women depends on improvements in knowledge of genetics and evidence-based practice by providers.

Because knowledge concerning genetics and genomics and its application to oncology care is continuing to grow, oncology nurses must be aware of appropriate advanced scope of practice roles based on education and training. All nurses must develop and maintain knowledge of the field, but advanced practice nurses working in genetics have additional competencies and management expectations. Collaboration among practice levels and disciplines is essential. This article focuses on the advanced practice role as further defined in published resources outlining scope of practice in genetics. 
.

Knowledge about genetics and genomics and its application to oncology care is rapidly expanding and evolving. As a result, oncology nurses at all levels must develop and maintain their knowledge of genetics and genomics, as well as be aware of resources to guide practice. This article focuses on implementation of the standards described in the updated Genetics/Genomics Nursing: Scope and Standards of Practice by the basic practitioner.
.

Georgia implemented a statewide family history screening program for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. From November 2012 through December 2020, 29 090 individuals were screened, 16 679 of whom (57.3%) self-identified as a racial/ethnic minority. Of the 4% (1172/29 090) of individuals who screened as high risk, more than half underwent genetic consultation (793/1172; 67.7%) and testing (416/589; 70.6%). Compared with White women, Black and Hispanic women had higher uptake rates of genetic consultation. Public health settings serving racial minorities are well suited to address disparities in genetic service access. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print July 21, 2022:e1–e4. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.306932 )