Vitamin A is essential for life in all vertebrate animals. Vitamin A requirement can be met from dietary preformed vitamin A or provitamin A carotenoids, the most important of which is β-carotene. The metabolism of β-carotene, including its intestinal absorption, accumulation in tissues, and conversion to vitamin A, varies widely across animal species and determines the role that β-carotene plays in meeting vitamin A requirement. This review begins with a brief discussion of vitamin A, with an emphasis on species differences in metabolism. A more detailed discussion of β-carotene follows, with a focus on factors impacting bioavailability and its conversion to vitamin A. Finally, the literature on how animals utilize β-carotene is reviewed individually for several species and classes of animals. We conclude that β-carotene conversion to vitamin A is variable and dependent on a number of factors, which are important to consider in the formulation and assessment of diets. Omnivores and herbivores are more efficient at converting β-carotene to vitamin A than carnivores. Absorption and accumulation of β-carotene in tissues vary with species and are poorly understood. More comparative and mechanistic studies are required in this area to improve the understanding of β-carotene metabolism.

Cats require more dietary protein than noncarnivorous species. Earlier work showed that cats lack the ability to regulate hepatic urea cycle enzymes in response to dietary protein concentration. We thus hypothesized that cats are unable to fully adapt protein oxidation to protein intake, particularly at low-protein concentrations. We used indirect respiration calorimetry to assess cats' ability to adapt substrate oxidation to diets containing different concentrations of protein, including 1 below their protein requirement. Nine cats (5 males and 4 females; 2.7 +/- 0.5 y; 4.49 +/- 0.19 kg) consumed each of 4 semipurified diets containing 7.5% [low protein (LP(3))], 14.2% [adequate protein (AP)], 27.1% [moderate protein (MP)], and 49.6% [high protein (HP)] of metabolizable energy from protein in a modified crossover design, beginning with the MP diet and then consuming the remaining diets in random order. After adaptation to each diet, cats completed a 5-d nitrogen balance trial and at least 2 12-h indirect calorimetry measurements. There was a significant effect of diet on protein oxidation (P < 0.0001), which measured 10.4 +/- 0.5, 14.1 +/- 1.0, 25.0 +/- 1.7, and 53.2 +/- 1.7% of total energy expenditure for the LP, AP, M,P and HP diets, respectively. The ratio of protein oxidation:protein intake was higher with the LP diet (1.39 +/- 0.07) than the other 3 diets (AP, 1.00 +/- 0.07; MP, 0.93 +/- 0.06; HP, 1.07 +/- 0.03; P < 0.0001), indicating a net loss of protein with the LP diet. Thus, cats are able to adapt protein oxidation to a wide range of dietary protein concentrations, provided their minimum protein requirement is met.

Dietary energy restriction (ER) is used to treat obesity in cats but it is often unsuccessful. The purpose of this study was to determine whether ER results in a sustained decrease in mass-adjusted energy expenditure (EE) that may oppose weight loss and promote weight regain. EE and body composition were measured in 10 adult neutered cats at 3 time points: baseline (obese cats), during weight loss (40% ER), and following weight regain. The cats started with a body weight (BW) of 6.1 +/- 0.30 kg, body condition score (BCS) of 7.6 +/- 0.14 (on a 9-point scale), and fat body mass (FM) of 38 +/- 1.0% of BW. After weight loss, BW was 5.0 +/- 0.19 kg, BCS was 5.5 +/- 0.07 kg, and FM was 31 +/- 1.6% (P < 0.01). After weight regain, BW was 6.2 +/- 0.30 kg, BCS was 7.7 +/- 0.16, and FM was 42 +/- 1.8% (P < 0.01). Total EE decreased from 1258 +/- 33.7 kJ/d to 1025 +/- 39.6 kJ/d during weight loss (P < 0.001). After weight regain, EE was still lower than baseline (1103 +/- 41.5 kJ/d, P < 0.001). Energy intake (EI) at baseline (1337 +/- 50.6 kJ/d) was higher than EI after weight loss and regain (1217 +/- 61.2 kJ/d), resulting in no differences in energy balance (78 +/- 30.4 and 104 +/- 35.4 kJ/d, respectively, P = 0.581). These results support the hypothesis that ER results in a mass-adjusted decrease in EE in cats that is maintained after weight regain.