Dacarbazine (DTIC) is a cytotoxic drug widely used for melanoma treatment. However, the putative contribution of anticancer immune responses in the efficacy of DTIC has not been evaluated. By testing how DTIC affects host immune responses to cancer in a mouse model of melanoma, we unexpectedly found that both natural killer (NK) and CD8(+) T cells were indispensable for DTIC therapeutic effect. Although DTIC did not directly affect immune cells, it triggered the upregulation of NKG2D ligands on tumor cells, leading to NK cell activation and IFNγ secretion in mice and humans. NK cell-derived IFNγ subsequently favored upregulation of major histocompatibility complex class I molecules on tumor cells, rendering them sensitive to cytotoxic CD8(+) T cells. Accordingly, DTIC markedly enhanced cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 inhibition efficacy in vivo in an NK-dependent manner. These results underscore the immunogenic properties of DTIC and provide a rationale to combine DTIC with immunotherapeutic agents that relieve immunosuppression in vivo.

Exosomes are nanovesicles released by all cells that can be found in the blood. A key point for their use as potential biomarkers in cancer is to differentiate tumour-derived exosomes from other circulating nanovesicles. Heat shock protein-70 (HSP70) has been shown to be abundantly expressed by cancer cells and to be associated with bad prognosis. We previously showed that exosomes derived from cancer cells carried HSP70 in the membrane while those from non-cancerous cells did not. In this work, we opened a prospective clinical pilot study including breast and lung cancer patients to determine whether it was possible to detect and quantify HSP70 exosomes in the blood of patients with solid cancers. We found that circulating exosomal HSP70 levels, but not soluble HSP70, reflected HSP70 content within the tumour biopsies. Circulating HSP70 exosomes increased in metastatic patients compared to non-metastatic patients or healthy volunteers. Further, we demonstrated that HSP70-exosome levels correlated with the disease status and, when compared with circulating tumour cells, were more sensitive tumour dissemination predictors. Finally, our case studies indicated that HSP70-exosome levels inversely correlated with response to the therapy and that, therefore, monitoring changes in circulating exosomal HSP70 might be useful to predict tumour response and clinical outcome.

In preclinical models, IL-1β inhibition could enhance the efficacy of fluorouracil (5-FU). In this phase 2 study, we assessed the activity and safety of 5-FU plus bevacizumab and anakinra (an IL-1β and α inhibitor) in patients with metastatic colorectal (mCRC) refractory to chemotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy.Eligible patients had unresectable mCRC; were refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, anti-VEGF therapy, and anti-EGFR therapy (for tumors with wild-type KRAS). Patients were treated with a simplified acid folinic plus 5-FU regimen and bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) both administered by intravenous infusion for 30 min every 2 weeks. Anakinra (100 mg) was injected subcutaneously once daily. The primary endpoint was the 2-month response rate determined upon CHOI criteria.Thirty two patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were enrolled. Five patients demonstrated response (Choi criteria) and 22 patients had stable disease as the best 2-month overall response. Median progression-free and overall survival were 5.4 (95% CI, 3.6–6.6) and 14.5 months (95% CI, 9–20.6) respectively. Twenty patients experienced grade 3 toxicity. No grade 4 or 5 toxicity related to therapy occurred. The most common grade 3 adverse events were neutropenia in 8 (25%) patients, digestive side effects in 7 (21.9%) patients and hypertension in 6 (18.75%) patients. No treatment-related deaths or serious adverse events were reported.5-FU plus bevacizumab and anakinra has promising activity and a manageable safety profile, suggesting that this combination might become a potential treatment option for patients with refractory mCRC.

Background: Genomically-guided clinical trials are performed across different tumor types sharing genetic mutations, but trial organization remains complex. Here we address the feasibility and utility of routine somatic and constitutional exome analysis in metastatic cancer patients. Methods: Exoma trial (NCT02840604) is a multicenter, prospective clinical trial. Eligible patients presented a metastatic cancer progressing after at least one line of systemic therapy. Constitutional genetics testing required geneticist consultation. Somatic and germline exome analysis was restricted to 317 genes. Variants were classified and molecular tumor board made therapeutic recommendations based on ESMO guidelines. Primary endpoint was the feasibility of the approach evaluated by the proportion of patient that received a therapeutic proposal. Findings: Between May 2016 and October 2018, 506 patients were included. Median time required for tumor sample reception was 8 days. Median time from sample reception to results was 52 days. Somatic analysis was performed for 456 patients (90.1%). Both somatic and constitutional analyses were successfully performed for 386 patients (76.3%). In total, 342 patients (75%) received a therapeutic proposal. Genetic susceptibility to cancer was found in 35 (9%) patients. Only, 79 patients (23.1%) were treated with NGS matched therapy mainly PI3K/ AKT/mTOR inhibitors 22 (27.8%), followed by PARP inhibitors 19 (24.1%), antiangiogenics 17 (21.5%), MEK inhibitors 7 (8.9%) and immunotherapy 5 (6.3%). Matched treatment was finally stopped because of disease progression 50 (63%), treatment toxicity 18 (23%), patients' death 4 (5%). PFS2/PFS1 ratio was > 1,3 for 23,5% of patients treated with the NGS matched therapy and 23,7% of patients treated with standard therapy. Interpretation: Study shows that exome analysis is feasible in cancer routine care. This strategy improves detection of genetic predispositions and enhances access to target therapies. However, no differences were observed between PFS ratios of patients treated with matched therapy versus standard therapy.

No abstract