Ordered two-dimensional arrays such as S-layers 1 , 2 and designed analogues 3 – 5 have intrigued bioengineers, 6 , 7 but with the exception of a single lattice formed with flexible linkers, 8 they are constituted from just one protein component. For modulating assembly dynamics and incorporating more complex functionality, materials composed of two components would have considerable advantages. 9 – 12 Here we describe a computational method to generate co-assembling binary layers by designing rigid interfaces between pairs of dihedral protein building-blocks, and use it to design a p6m lattice. The designed array components are soluble at mM concentrations, but when combined at nM concentrations, rapidly assemble into nearly crystalline micrometer-scale arrays nearly identical (based on TEM and SAXS) to the computational design model in vitro and in cells without the need for a two-dimensional support. Because the material is designed from the ground up, the components can be readily functionalized, and their symmetry reconfigured, enabling formation of ligand arrays with distinguishable surfaces which we demonstrate can drive extensive receptor clustering, downstream protein recruitment, and signaling. Using AFM on supported bilayers and quantitative microscopy on living cells, we show that arrays assembled on membranes have component stoichiometry and structure similar to arrays formed in vitro, and thus that our material can impose order onto fundamentally disordered substrates like cell membranes. In sharp contrast to previously characterized cell surface receptor binding assemblies such as antibodies and nanocages, which are rapidly endocytosed, we find that large arrays assembled at the cell surface suppress endocytosis in a tunable manner, with potential therapeutic relevance for extending receptor engagement and immune evasion. Our work paves the way towards a synthetic cell biology, where a new generation of multi-protein macroscale materials is designed to modulate cell responses and reshape synthetic and living systems.
Regions of the genome with the potential to form secondary DNA structures pose a frequent and significant impediment to DNA replication and must be actively managed in order to preserve genetic and epigenetic integrity. How the replisome detects and responds to secondary structures is poorly understood. Here, we show that a core component of the fork protection complex in the eukaryotic replisome, Timeless, harbours in its C‐terminal region a previously unappreciated DNA‐binding domain that exhibits specific binding to G‐quadruplex (G4) DNA structures. We show that this domain contributes to maintaining processive replication through G4‐forming sequences, and exhibits partial redundancy with an adjacent PARP‐binding domain. Further, this function of Timeless requires interaction with and activity of the helicase DDX11. Loss of both Timeless and DDX11 causes epigenetic instability at G4‐forming sequences and DNA damage. Our findings indicate that Timeless contributes to the ability of the replisome to sense replication‐hindering G4 formation and ensures the prompt resolution of these structures by DDX11 to maintain processive DNA synthesis.
& equal contribution2 Regions of the genome with the potential to form secondary structure pose a frequent and significant impediment to DNA replication and must be actively managed in order to preserve genetic and epigenetic integrity. The fork protection complex (FPC), a conserved group of replisome-associated proteins including Timeless, Tipin, and Claspin, plays an important role in maintaining efficient replisome activation, ensuring optimum fork rates, sister chromatid cohesion and checkpoint function. It also helps maintain the stability of sequences prone to secondary structure formation through an incompletely understood mechanism. Here, we report a previously unappreciated DNA binding domain in the C-terminus of Timeless, which exhibits specific binding to G quadruplex (G4) structures. We show that, in vivo, both the C-terminus of Timeless and the DDX11 helicase act collaboratively to ensure processive replication of G4 structures to prevent genetic and epigenetic instability.DNA can create significant impediments to its own replication through formation of secondary structures. When unwound, certain sequences, often repetitive or of low complexity, can adopt a variety of non-B form structures, including hairpins, cruciforms, triplexes and quadruplexes 1 . It is becoming clear that secondary structure formation is a frequent event during replication, even at genomically abundant sequences previously thought not to be a major source of difficulty 2 . To prevent such sequences causing havoc with the genetic and epigenetic stability of the genome, cells deploy an intricate network of activities to counteract secondary structure formation and limit its effects. These activities include proteins that bind and destabilise DNA structures and specialised helicases that unwind them 3 . In addition, the repriming activity of PrimPol can be deployed to confine a structure into a minimal region of single stranded DNA, limiting the potential dangers of exposing extensive ssDNA in a stalled replisome 2,4 . G quadruplexes (G4s) are one of the most intensively studied and potent structural replication impediments. G4s arise in consequence of the ability of guanine to form Hoogsteen base-paired quartets 5 . In favourable sequence contexts, comprising runs of dG separated by variable numbers of non-G bases, stacks of G quartets form G4s secondary structures. Current estimates suggest that over 700,000 sites in the human genome have the potential to form G4s 6 . While some of these G4s may have important roles in genome physiology, all pose a potential threat to DNA replication and sites with G4-forming potential have been linked to both genetic and epigenetic instability 7,8 .3Precisely how DNA structures are detected and resolved by the replication machinery remains unclear. Many of the factors involved in processing G4 secondary structures, for instance FANCJ and REV1 9-13 , do not appear to be constitutive components of the replisome 14 . It is thus likely that core components of the replisome will act as 'first respo...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.