Summary
Fossil fuel is scanty and negatively affects the earth by inducing climate change. As a result, alternative and renewable energy (RE) sources are being investigated to replace fossil fuel. Wind and solar energy are leaders in the RE market, but huge and accessible other energy sources such as salinity gradient power (SGP) exist and need to be collected to contribute to the global energy demand. SGP is mainly extracted with reverse electrodialysis (RED) and pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) systems. The applicability of RED‐SGP in a natural environment is the current challenge due to the low power density and the high Levelized cost of energy (LCOE) of the process. The properties of the ion‐exchange membranes (IEMs), the spacers, the feed solutions characteristics and salinity, and the electrodes are among the most important parameters that control the performance of RED‐SGP processes. New highly selective, conductive, and cost‐effective membranes are required to improve RED performance and reduce the produced energy cost. Alternatives feed solutions such as wastewaters and brine from desalination plants as well as hybrid RED such as RED combined to electrodialysis (ED), reverse osmosis (RO), or membrane distillation (MD) will result in cost‐effective water treatment and SGP extraction.
a b s t r a c tLandfill leachate is a high-strength wastewater with high concentration of harmful pollutants and is produced in almost all countries with high variation in constituents. In this study, a modified direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) has been used to investigate the treatability of raw and pretreated landfill leachate. Two different hydrophobic membranes, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and polyvinylidene difluoride membranes with two different pore sizes (0.22 and 0.45 µm, respectively) were used and performed at three various delta temperatures (∆T); 30°C, 40°C and 50°C. The rejection efficiencies for conductivity, COD, sulfate, alkalinity and hardness were approximately 85%, 99%, 95%, 90% and 98%, respectively, with raw leachate and 99%, 98%, 92%, 85% and 98%, respectively, with pretreated leachate, while NH 4 + -N removal efficiency was about 70% and 92% for raw and pretreated leachate, respectively. The highest transmembrane fluxes (TMF) were obtained at a ∆T of 50°C with 0.45 µm pore size of PTFE membrane. The highest TMF with raw leachate was 9.87 L/m 2 h while it was 15.54 L/m 2 h with pretreated leachate. Contact angles and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy were used to evaluate the resistance of the membranes to wetting and fouling.
A large amount of textile waste is generated every year around the globe. The textile product made from natural fibers might be vermicomposted and used as fertilizer. The present study aimed to research an integrated system of pre-composting (pathogen kill) and vermicomposting with various levels of post-consumer cotton waste to determine if this addition has any effects on the composting process. A vermicompost bin was constructed and filled with feedstocks mixed with post-consumer cotton textile waste at a 25:1 C:N ratio, and operated for three months at approximately 70% moisture content, with four composting trials with 0 g (control), 100 g, 200 g, and 300 g of textile waste. The pre-composting stage reached a temperature ranging from 40 °C to 50 °C, able to neutralize the pathogens. All four trials resulted in final compost with C: N ratios around 14, proving that post-consumer cotton textile waste did not affect the vermicomposting process, and was successfully used as a carbon source by worms to produce a healthy and mature compost. This indicates a sustainable option for the recovery of textile waste that is being decomposed in landfills.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.