Few studies show that "emergency extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (eESWL)" reduces the incidence of ureteroscopy in patients with ureteric calculi. We assess success of eESWL and look to study and identify factors which predict successful outcome. We retrospectively studied patients presenting with their first episode of ureteric colic undergoing eESWL (within 72 h of presentation) over a 5-year period. Patient's age, gender, stone size and location, time between presentation and ESWL, number of shock waves and ESWL sessions, and Hounsfield units (HU) were recorded. 97 patients (mean age 40 years; 76 males, 21 females) were included. 71 patients were stone free after eESWL (73.2 %) (group 1) and 26 patients failed treatment and proceeded to ureteroscopy (group 2). The two groups were well matched for age and gender. Mean stone size in group 1 and 2 was 6.4 mm and 7.7 mm, respectively, (p = 0.00141). Stone location was 34, 21, and 16 in upper, middle and lower ureter in group 1 compared to 11, 5, and 10 in group 2, respectively. Mean HU in group 1 was 480 and 612 in group 2 (p value 0.0036). In group 2, significantly, more patients received treatment after 24 h compared with group 1 (38 vs 22.5 %). The number of shock waves, maximal intensity, and ESWL sessions were not significantly different in the two groups. No complications were noted. eESWL is safe and effective in patients with ureteric colic. Stone size and Hounsfield units are important factors in predicting success. Early treatment (≤24 h) minimizes stone impaction and increases the success rate of ESWL.
Although currently the number of patients is small and follow-up is short, this procedure appears to be effective in relieving both symptoms and obstruction in patients with lower-pole crossing vessels. Other benefits include shorter operative time, less blood loss, as well as no risk of anastomotic stricture and urine leak when compared with a dismembered pyeloplasty. The Double-J stent can be removed within a few days (typically 5 in our hands) or even shorter where logistically feasible. This reduces stent-related complications.
There are a number of graspers and baskets to snare and remove stones during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). These instrumental techniques can, however, cause inadvertent trauma to the renal mucosa and can be time consuming. Increasingly, these graspers and baskets are disposable, which also has financial implications. We use a simple technique to flush out fragments from the kidney during PCNL. Once fragments have been identified as a size that can pass through the Amplatz sheath, a cut nasogastric tube is inserted through the sheath--if possible next to or behind the fragments. It is repeatedly moved forward and backward in a jerking motion while saline is instilled under some pressure to create some turbulence. This results in the mechanical flushing out of stone fragments. We have found this to be a safe, effective, and reliable technique of stone extraction during PCNL.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.