Plan continuation error is grounded in progressive commitment. This brief discussion utilizes an alternative, complementary methodology to explore the relationship of context to plan fixation in plan continuation error. This study augments a more comprehensive, data-based research effort that seeks to identify how context contributes to General Aviation pilot errors in weather-related decision-making. Context should be broadly considered as a complex configuration of relevant events or phenomenon that may be considered the domain within which the pilot makes the weather-related decision.
The main theses of the article show the ways that various groups, whether ethnic, racial, religious or even ideological fall prey to monological positions without recognizing their own limitations. Thus they assume a “universal” position as all inclusive and true to reality itself. Those who hold such a position are not cognizant that without dialogical engagement there would not be a position. In this sense, the dialogical encounter allows one to have a position and its limitation. Moreover, monological positions tend to define others in such a way, that the others accept such definitions and become part of a specific monologue. The article is designed to show the ways of extricating oneself from monological posturing.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.