A model for the timing of repetitive discrete motor responses is proposed, and a prediction of negative dependency between successive interresponse intervals is coniumed by data from a Morse key tapping task. A method that makes use of the first-order serial correlation between interresponse intervals is used to distinguish between variance due to a timekeeping process and variance in motor response delays subsequent to the timekeeper. These two quantities are examined as a function of mean interresponse interval.

Analogs of models of duration discrimination are here related to the timing of discrete motor responses. The measure of interest is the variability in duration of intervals collected in short interval reproduction tasks. For data from a Morse key-tapping task, it is shown that, taken separately, neither of the models described can completely account for the relation between the mean and the variance of the interresponse intervals.

The difference threshold for duration, for the case of empty time intervals bounded by brief auditory pulses, is an increasing function of base duration. For base durations between 100 and 1,480 msec, Weber's law describes the function quite well and a Weber ratio of .05 is obtained. These results in the present paper conform closely to results that have been reported by others. However, it is further shown that the function changes as the amount of practice is increased at each specific base duration: steps unfold from the linear function, and these steps are clearly evident after 17 consecutive sessions at each base duration. Expressing threshold in terms of the apparent magnitude of the "time quantum," it is found that q is about 13 msec when base duration is 100 msec and that it jumps to 25 at 200, to 50 at 400, and to 100 at 800. Between the abrupt risers in this step function, the treads are not quite flat, perhaps because the amount of practice was insufficient. It is concluded that the time quantum can be doubled and halved, at least within the doubles set 13, 25, 50, and 100 msec. It is not restricted to the single value of 50 msec as initially proposed (Kristofferson, 1967).

There are few quantitative theories of duration discrimination and few established empirical phenomena to guide theorizing. This paper discusses three such theories and several empirical findings. The theories assume that the discrimination is based only upon information extracted from the temporal extent of the stimulus pattern, and experimental evidence is presented that clearly supports this assumption for many stimulus patterns. Recent findings which indicate that duration information is analyzed in certain ways that are fundamentally different from other stimulus dimensions are reviewed, the duration discrimination psychometric function is examined, and the time-order error is discussed. The three theories are compared in terms of their ability to incorporate the empirical data.

No abstract