SummaryBackground: Treatment for displaced proximal humeral fractures is still under debate. Poor rotator cuff status and non-union of the tubercles in elderly patients has caused reversed total shoulder prosthesis growing popularity and showed promising results, even in comparison to angular stable plates fixation. The purpose of this study is to report clinical and radiological results of proximal humerus fractures treated with rTSA or ORIF in elderly.

PurposeUnrecognized posterior shoulder dislocation with a concomitant humeral head fracture affects joint function and no consensus exists regarding treatment. The present study analyses clinical and radiographic outcomes of a novel arthroscopic technique for reducing chronic locked posterior shoulder dislocation associated with subscapularis remplissage. MethodsThe study comprises a retrospective analysis of consecutive chronic posterior locked shoulders (CPLS) with minimum 2‐years follow‐up of patients who had undergone McLaughlin technique arthroscopic modification for the treatment of CPLS with a reverse Hill–Sachs lesion. Active range of motion (ROM), Western Ontario (WOSI) and Constant Score (CS), were evaluated pre‐ and postoperatively. Plain radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were collected pre‐ and post‐operatively, recording bone defect, osteoarthritis, cuff integrity/fatty infiltration, and the grade of filling of the reverse Hill‐Sachs. ResultsTwelve male patients with a mean follow‐up of 37.3 months ± 10.5 (range, 24–58) were included. Mean WOSI and CS scores improved from 41 to 92 and 28 to 94 points, respectively. ROM measurements all had significantly increased at final follow‐up, with no significant differences in arm rotation. No defects were left unfilled at final MRI examination. ConclusionThe results of this uncontrolled study with a limited number of patients confirm that arthroscopic reduction and subscapularis remplissage is a highly effective and satisfactory treatment method resulting in no shoulder rotation deficits. Level of evidenceLevel IV.

Muscle injuries are the most common trauma in team and individual sports. The muscles most frequently affected are those of the lower limb, and in particular hamstrings, adductors, rectus femoris and calf muscles. Although several scientific studies have tried to propose different rehabilitation protocols, still too often the real rehabilitation process is not based on scientific knowledge, especially in non-elite athletes. Moreover, the growing use of physical and instrumental therapies has made it increasingly difficult to understand what can be truly effective. Therefore, the aim of the present paper is to review proposed therapeutic algorithms for muscle injuries, proposing a concise and practical summary. Following a three-phase rehabilitation protocol, this review aims to describe the conservative treatment of indirect structural muscle injuries, which are the more routinely found and more challenging type. For each phase, until return to training and return to sport are completed, the functional goal, the most appropriate practitioner, and the best possible treatment according to current evidence are expressed. Finally, the last section is focused on the specific exercise rehabilitation for the four main muscle groups with a structured explanatory timetable.

Background: Rehabilitation after Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA) is still object of discussion with no based evidence guidelines. The aim of this study was to test a personalized rehabilitation protocol for three different patients groups according to clinical and intraoperative parameters that can affect final outcomes after RSA. Patients and methods: We retrospectively evaluated a consecutive series of 112 patients who underwent to RSA between 2013 and 2015. The average follow-up was 29.2 months. A preoperative and postoperative clinical and radiographic assessment was performed. According to clinical, radiographic and intraoperative parameters, we selected three groups dedicating each one a specific level of post surgical care. Results: A statistically significant improvement was achieved from preoperative evaluation, regarding all analysed parameters. Notable improvements were reported in high care group: elevation improved of 63.9° despite of Group A 55.5° and Group B 54.5° and it resulted statistically significant (p< 0.05). Costant Score increased of 35.9%, despite of Group A and Group B respectively 40.6% and 34.8% (p> 0.05). Conclusion: Our study shows that a personalized rehabilitation protocol can be effective improving clinical outcomes and decreasing complications rate, particularly in difficult management patients. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV.

Background Several modifications to the original Grammont reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) design have been proposed to prevent distinctive issues, such as both glenoid and humeral lateralization. The aim of this systematic review was to determine rates of problems, complications, reoperations, and revisions after onlay lateralized humeral stem RSA, hypothesizing that these are design related. Methods This systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement guidelines. A literature search was conducted (01.01.2000–14.04.2020) using PubMed, Cochrane Reviews, Scopus, and Google Scholar employing several combinations of keywords: “reverse shoulder arthroplasty,” “reverse shoulder prosthesis,” “inverse shoulder arthroplasty,” “inverse shoulder prosthesis,” “problems,” “complications,” “results,” “outcomes,” “reoperation,” “revision.” Results Thirty-one studies with 4893 RSA met inclusion criteria. The 892 postoperative problems and 296 postoperative complications represented overall problem and complication rates of 22.7% and 7.5%, respectively. Forty-one reoperations and 63 revisions resulted, with an overall reoperation rate of 1.7% and overall revision rate of 2.6%. Conclusions Problem, complication, and reintervention rates proved acceptable when implanting a high humeral lateralization stem in RSA. The most frequent problem was scapular notching (12.6%), and the most common postoperative complication was scapular stress fracture (1.8%). An overall humeral complication rate of 1.9% was identified, whereas short stems reported no humeral fractures or stem loosening. Infections (1.3%) proved to be the most common reason for component revision, and instability had a complication rate of 0.8%. Level of evidence Systematic review IV