In the first part of this study, samples were collected from farms, cheese processing plants (CPPs), and retail markets located in various geographical areas of Sonora, Mexico, over a 12-month period during the summer of 2004 and winter of 2005. Four (all Queso Fresco [QF] from retail markets) of 349 total samples tested positive for Listeria monocytogenes (Lm). Of these four positive samples, three were collected in the northern region and one in the southern region of Sonora. Additionally, two were collected during the winter months, and two were collected during the summer months. For the second part of the study, a total of 39 samples from a farm, a CPP, and retail markets were collected and processed according to a combination of the Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-143-SSA1-1995.10 method (NOM) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Bacteriological Analytical Manual method, and 27 samples from these same locations were collected and processed according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service method (USDA-FSIS). The NOM-FDA method recovered the pathogen from 6 (15%) of 39 samples (one cheese and five product contact surfaces), while the USDA-FSIS method recovered the pathogen from 5 (18.5%) of 27 samples (all product contact surfaces). In addition, the 40 isolates recovered from the 15 total samples that tested positive for Lm grouped into five distinct pulsotypes that were ca. 60% related, as determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis. The results of this study confirmed a 3.4% prevalence of Lm in QF collected from retail markets located in Sonora and no appreciable difference in the effectiveness of either the NOM-FDA or USDA-FSIS method to recover the pathogen from cheese or environmental samples.
Antiproliferative activity of three extracts obtained from red microalgae Rhodosorus marinus was evaluated against cervical (HeLa), colon (HCT 116), lung (A549), prostate (22Rv-1) and breast (HCC38 and MDA-MB-231) cancer cell lines. Antibacterial activity of these extracts was also tested against Salmonella choleraesuis, Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus. All extracts were obtained from lyophilized biomass of red microalgae. Extract A was obtained using 40% ammonium sulfate precipitation and gel filtration chromatography with G-25 sephadex. Extract B was subjected to a similar process, but 60% ammonium sulfate precipitation was used. Extract C was obtained by methanol extraction and hydrophobicity chromatography using amberlite XAD-2. Protein concentration was determined in two extracts and total phenols in one extract, using Bradford and Folin techniques. Antiproliferative activity was evaluated at extract concentrations ranging from 0.125 to 1 mg/ml, using the spectrophotometric technique MTT (3 -(4,5 -dimetiltiazolyl -2) -2,5 -diphenyltetrazolium bromide). The antibacterial activity was evaluated by the impregnated disk test. Extract C showed antiproliferative activity against almost all cancer cell lines with an IC 50 of 0.5 (HCT 116), 0.8 (HeLa), 0.9 (MDA-MB-231), 0.1 (HCC38), and 0.4 (22Rv-1) mg/ml, whereas none of the tested extracts showed antibacterial activity under experimental conditions.
Las microalgas marinas pueden ser una fuente de moléculas bioactivas; existen numerosos reportes de actividad antioxidante, antibacteriana y antiproliferativa de extractos obtenidos a partir de macroalgas. El objetivo del presente trabajo fue evaluar la actividad citotóxica, antioxidante y antimutagénica del extracto metanólico de la microalga roja Rhodosorus marinus. El extracto fue obtenido a partir de biomasa liofilizada mediante lisis ácida y sonicación. Se evaluó la actividad citotóxica frente a 7 líneas celulares humanas con el ensayo MTT, la actividad antioxidante por ABTS y DPPH y la actividad antimutagénica con las cepas TA98 y TA100 del ensayo de Ames. Se encontró actividad citotóxica frente a 5 de las 7 líneas evaluadas. Los porcentajes de inhibición para la actividad antioxidante fueron de 25.60 + 4.03% (DPPH) y 5.59 + 0.63% (ABTS). Para el ensayo de Ames, frente a ambasm cepas probadas se alcanzaron porcentajes de inhibición de colonias revertantes de aproximadamente el 75% en la concentración más alta evaluada, lo cual indica una fuerte actividad antimutagénica. Los resultados mostraron actividad biológica en las diferentes pruebas realizadas, por lo que se infiere que el extracto metanólico contiene moléculas bioactivas de importancia en la salud y para diferentes usos biotecnológicos.
Antibiotic resistance is a serious global threat, and the misuse of antibiotics is considered its main cause. It is characterized by the expression of bacterial defense mechanisms, e.g., β-lactamases, expulsion pumps, and biofilm development. Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are antibiotic-resistant species that cause high morbidity and mortality. Several alternatives are proposed to defeat antibiotic resistance, including antimicrobial peptides, bacteriophages, and plant compounds. Terpenes from different plant essential oils have proven antimicrobial action against pathogenic bacteria, and evidence is being generated about their effect against antibiotic-resistant species. That is the case for oregano essential oil (Lippia graveolens), whose antibacterial effect is widely attributed to carvacrol, its main component; however, minor constituents could have an important contribution. The analyzed evidence reveals that most antibacterial evaluations have been performed on single species; however, it is necessary to analyze their activity against multispecies systems. Hence, another alternative is using plant compounds to inactivate hydrolytic enzymes and biofilms to potentiate antibiotics’ effects. Despite the promising results of plant terpenes, more extensive and deep mechanistic studies are needed involving antibiotic-resistant multispecies to understand their full potential against this problem.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.