Introduction The objective of this article is to identify the factors that influence the choice of contraceptive methods in the postpartum period. Methods We conducted a qualitative systematic review including articles published between 2000 and 2021 on postpartum contraception and its related influential factors. Relying on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses and synthesis without meta‐analysis checklists, the search strategy relied on a combination of 2 lists of keywords applied to 9 databases. A bias assessment was carried out with the help of the Cochrane's randomized controlled trial tool, the checklist from Downs and Black, and Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (CoreQ). A thematic analysis was performed to identify categories of influential factors. Results A total of 34 studies met our inclusion criteria and enabled us to isolate 4 categories of factors: (1) demographic and economic factors (geographic and ethnic origin, age, living environment, education/wealth), (2) clinical elements (parity, evolution of pregnancy, childbirth and afterwards, contraception used previously and its mechanism, pregnancy planning), (3) health care delivery (pregnancy monitoring, sessions about contraception, health care system, place of delivery), and (4) sociocultural factors (knowledge and beliefs about contraception, religion, the influence of family and society). The decision process related to postpartum contraception is influenced by a combination of socioenvironmental factors and clinical elements. Discussion The main influential factors (parity, level of education, knowledge and beliefs about contraception, and influence of family) need to be addressed by clinicians during consultations. Further multivariate research should provide quantitative data on this topic.

BackgroundFor more than 60 years, psychiatric services has gradually gone from an asylum model to a community model. This change has led to the emergence of a deinstitutionalization movement. This movement seems to have left behind long-term hospitalized aging individuals with severe and disabling mental disorders. The objective of this article is to conduct a review on the challenges and issues associated with the process of deinstitutionalization among hospitalized aging individuals with severe and disabling mental disorders.MethodsUsing PRISMA statement, the research methodology was carried out in English and French in 16 databases with a combination of 3 lists of keywords. The selection process was then followed by a thematic analysis which aimed at categorizing by theme and classifying the writings selected.ResultsA total of 83 articles published between 1978 and 2019 were selected and organized into six categories: (a) a forgotten population in research and health policies, (b) an economic presentation of the deinstitutionalization process, (c) an improvement in quality of life and global functioning for deinstitutionalized patients (d) from stigmatization to the rejection of elderly psychiatric inpatients from deinstutionalization process, (e) a difficult community-based care offer and a difficult epistemological identification, (f) from the lack of community services to the phenomenon of transinstitutionalization. The current state of scientific research, institutional policies and clinical practices associated with the deinstitutionalization process of SVPTSIH are then commented.ConclusionsRecommendations are proposed to researchers and professionals concerned with the support of long-term hospitalized aging individuals with severe and disabling mental disorders.