Aims Predicting risk in individuals with a systemic right ventricle (SRV) remains difficult. We assessed the value of cardiac MRI (CMR) for predicting death, heart transplantation (HT), or need for a ventricular assist device (VAD) in adults with D-transposition of the great arteries (DTGA) post Mustard/Senning and in adults with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (ccTGA) at two large academic centres. Methods and resultsBetween December 1999 and November 2020, 158 adult patients with an SRV underwent CMR. Indexed right ventricular end-diastolic volume (RVEDVI), indexed right ventricular end-systolic volume (RVESVI), right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF), and right ventricular mass (RV mass) were determined by a core laboratory. Receiver operating curves, area under the curve (AUC), and cut-points maximizing sensitivity and specificity for the endpoint for each CMR parameter were calculated. Over a median of 8.5 years, 21 patients (13%) met a combined endpoint of HT referral, VAD, or death. Each CMR parameter was significantly associated with the endpoint in both cohorts. The AUCs for RVEDVI, RVESVI, RVEF, and RV mass to predict the endpoint were 0.93, 0.90, 0.73, and 0.84 for DTGA and 0.76, 0.74, 0.71, and 0.74 for ccTGA, respectively. Optimized cut-points for RVEDVI were calculated for DTGA and ccTGA and were 132 and 126 mL/m 2 , respectively. RVEDVI cut-points were simplified to 130 mL/m 2 for survival analysis, which was significantly associated with survival in both cohorts. Conclusions Cardiac MRI parameters are associated with an increased risk of death, HT, or VAD in patients with an SRV and should be considered to facilitate risk stratification.
Background Recently, selexipag, a new orally available and selective prostacyclin receptor agonist, has become available for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), but experience in patients with PAH associated with congenital heart disease (CHD) is limited to patients with closed defects. Purpose We present our early multi-centre experience using selexipag in the heterogeneous PAH-CHD population. Methods We prospectively evaluated adults with PAH-CHD from five PAH-CHD expert centres who were treated with selexipag. Patients were titrated to highest tolerable individualized dose (200 to 1,600 μg twice daily), after which patients entered the maintenance phase. Data on functional class (FC), 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), imaging and biochemical (N terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP]) parameters were collected. Results Thirty-four patients (age 43±14 years, 56% female, 60% Eisenmenger syndrome, 22% Down syndrome, 60% dual PAH therapy) were started on selexipag. All patients experienced at least 2 side effects during the initial uptitration phase. Most side effects were manageable and diminished after reaching the maintenance dose, but eight patients discontinued treatment due to side effects during the titration phase. The most frequent side effects were consistent with the known side effects of prostacyclins, including headache, nausea, diarrhoea and jaw pain. Majority (68%) of patients reached lower maintenance doses of 200–600 μg. At 12 months, FC improved in three patients and remained unchanged in the others. 6-minute walk distance remained stable throughout follow-up (475 to 470 m; p=n.s.) in patients who remained on-treatment compared to patients who stopped selexipag (485 to 370 m). NT-proBNP levels remained stable in patients on-treatment (520 to 600 ng/L) but worsened in patients who stopped (700 to 1000 ng/L). One patient died during follow-up from end-stage heart failure. Conclusion There is a promising role for selexipag in the treatment of adults with PAH-CHD. However, based on our experience, the use is challenging due to complexity in dosing and side effect profiles, which limit patients' tolerability and acceptance during the titration phase. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Other. Main funding source(s): Actelion Pharmaceuticals
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.