Start-ups often post updates during equity crowdfunding campaigns. However, little is known about the effects of such updates on crowd participation. We investigate this question by using hand-collected data from 71 funding campaigns and 39,399 investment decisions on two German equity crowdfunding portals. Using a combination of different empirical research techniques, we find that posting an update has a significant positive effect on the number of investments made by the crowd and the investment amount collected by the start-up. This effect does not occur immediately in its entirety; rather, it lags the update by a few days. Furthermore, the effect of updates loses statistical significance with the number of updates posted during a campaign. We also find that an easier language used in updates increases crowd participation, whereas the length of updates has no effects. With respect to the update's content, we find that the positive effect can be attributed to updates about new developments of the start-up such as campaign developments, new funding, business developments, and cooperation projects. Updates on the start-up team, business model, product developments, and promotional campaigns do not have meaningful effects. Our paper contributes to the literature on the effects of information disclosure on equity crowdfunding participation. Furthermore, our results have practical implications for start-ups and their investor communication during equity crowdfunding campaigns.
Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.
Purpose -This study's aim is to investigate the role of investor communication in equity-based crowdfunding. The study explores whether and how investor communication can reduce information asymmetries between investors and new ventures in equity-based crowdfunding, thereby facilitating the crowd's investment decisions. Design/methodology/approach -This paper follows an exploratory qualitative research approach based on semi-structured interviews with 23 market participants in equity-based crowdfunding: 12 investors, 6 new ventures and 5 third parties (mostly platform operators). After analyzing, coding and categorizing the data, this paper developed a theoretical framework and presented it in a set of six propositions. Findings -The results indicate that the venture's overall impression -especially perceived sympathy, openness and trustworthiness -is important to reduce perceived information asymmetries of investors in equity-based crowdfunding. To communicate these soft facts, personal communication seems to be replaced by pseudo-personal communication over the Internet (e.g. videos, investor relations channels and social media). In addition, the communications of third parties (e.g. other crowd investors, professional and experienced investors and other external stakeholders) influence the decision-making process of investors in equity-based crowdfunding. Third-party endorsements reduce the perceived information asymmetries and lower the importance of pseudo-personal communications by the venture. Originality/value -Prior research shows that investor communication reduces information asymmetries between companies and investors. Currently, little is known about the role of investor communication in equity-based crowdfunding. This study focuses on the role of investor communication to reduce the perceived information asymmetries of investors in equity-based crowdfunding.
Crowdfunding has become important in recent years. However, a comprehensive overview of the economic literature on this topic does not exist. This paper provides an overview of the crowdfunding literature, classified by the main actors (capital seekers, capital providers, and intermediaries), and presents important research questions for future research.
Despite the presence of the term 'entrepreneurial role model' (ERM) in the discourse on entrepreneurship, existing empirical evidence on the effects of role models is rather limited. By investigating 86 published journal articles, we provide a structured overview of the academic research on role models' effects on entrepreneurial intentions and behavior. We reveal that prior research focuses particularly on different types of role models (by whom), at which stage of life (when) and in which context the exposure to role models occurs. We use these research areas to structure our review. By expanding the understanding of the current state of ERM research, we reveal research gaps and provide future research recommendations. Our work could help policy makers and educators consider the different types of role models, the sociocultural context and the life cycle stage of the participants in structuring their entrepreneurship education programs.
PrefaceSmall and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are often called the backbone of the European economy, contributing to job creation and economic growth. In 2013, more than 21.5m of SMEs in the European Union made for more than 99% of all non-financial enterprises, employed almost 89m people (67% of total employment), and generated 58% of total added value. However, access to finance is more difficult for SMEs than for larger enterprises, not only during the current financial and economic crisis, but also on a permanent structural basis, due to market imperfections in SME financing (see Kraemer-Eis, Lang and Gvetadze, 2015, for more details).The European Investment Fund (EIF) supports Europe's SMEs by improving their access to finance through a wide range of selected financial intermediaries. To this end, the EIF primarily designs, promotes and implements equity and debt financial instruments which specifically target SMEs. In this role, the EIF fosters EU objectives in support of entrepreneurship, growth, innovation, research and development, and employment.EIF's Research & Market Analysis team has established a research cooperation with the Chair of Management at the University of Trier. This EIF Working Paper is one result of the successful cooperation. A follow-on project, building on the findings of the presented analysis and financially supported by the EIB Institute under the Knowledge Programme, is scheduled to start soon.Even though research in SME financing has strongly increased over the recent years, the financing patterns of SMEs in Europe are still not well analysed. Previous empirical studies have shown that firm-, product-, industry-, and country-specific factors influence the financing of SMEs. However, there are only few studies with a holistic perspective taking into account the interrelationships between different financing instruments and their determinants.The research, presented in this EIF Working Paper, provides an integrative perspective of SME financing patterns by identifying and analysing in detail the use of various financing instruments by SMEs. The findings can support the design and development of SME financing instruments across Europe.We thank the researchers for their important work and the very good cooperation with the EIF. We also thank the participants of a seminar with the researchers, which took place at EIF, as well as the participants of a workshop that took place at the European Central Bank, for fruitful discussions. This EIF Working Paper takes a holistic approach to investigate SME financing patterns in Europe by performing a cluster analysis including 12,726 SMEs in 28 European countries. The results reveal that SME financing in Europe is not homogenous but that different financing patterns exist. The cluster analysis identifies six distinct SME financing types: mixed-financed SMEs, statesubsidised SMEs, debt-financed SMEs, flexible-debt-financed SMEs, trade-financed SMEs and internally-financed SMEs. These SME financing types differ according to the number of fin...
PrefaceSmall and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are often called the backbone of the European economy, contributing to job creation and economic growth. In 2013, more than 21.5m of SMEs in the European Union made for more than 99% of all non-financial enterprises, employed almost 89m people (67% of total employment), and generated 58% of total added value. However, access to finance is more difficult for SMEs than for larger enterprises, not only during the current financial and economic crisis, but also on a permanent structural basis, due to market imperfections in SME financing (see Kraemer-Eis, Lang and Gvetadze, 2015, for more details).The European Investment Fund (EIF) supports Europe's SMEs by improving their access to finance through a wide range of selected financial intermediaries. To this end, the EIF primarily designs, promotes and implements equity and debt financial instruments which specifically target SMEs. In this role, the EIF fosters EU objectives in support of entrepreneurship, growth, innovation, research and development, and employment.EIF's Research & Market Analysis team has established a research cooperation with the Chair of Management at the University of Trier. This EIF Working Paper is one result of the successful cooperation. A follow-on project, building on the findings of the presented analysis and financially supported by the EIB Institute under the Knowledge Programme, is scheduled to start soon.Even though research in SME financing has strongly increased over the recent years, the financing patterns of SMEs in Europe are still not well analysed. Previous empirical studies have shown that firm-, product-, industry-, and country-specific factors influence the financing of SMEs. However, there are only few studies with a holistic perspective taking into account the interrelationships between different financing instruments and their determinants.The research, presented in this EIF Working Paper, provides an integrative perspective of SME financing patterns by identifying and analysing in detail the use of various financing instruments by SMEs. The findings can support the design and development of SME financing instruments across Europe.We thank the researchers for their important work and the very good cooperation with the EIF. We also thank the participants of a seminar with the researchers, which took place at EIF, as well as the participants of a workshop that took place at the European Central Bank, for fruitful discussions. This EIF Working Paper takes a holistic approach to investigate SME financing patterns in Europe by performing a cluster analysis including 12,726 SMEs in 28 European countries. The results reveal that SME financing in Europe is not homogenous but that different financing patterns exist. The cluster analysis identifies six distinct SME financing types: mixed-financed SMEs, statesubsidised SMEs, debt-financed SMEs, flexible-debt-financed SMEs, trade-financed SMEs and internally-financed SMEs. These SME financing types differ according to the number of fin...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.