BackgroundAllergen exposure leads to allergen sensitization in susceptible individuals and this might influence allergic rhinitis (AR) phenotype expression. We investigated whether sensitization patterns vary in a country with subtropical and tropical regions and if sensitization patterns relate to AR phenotypes or age.MethodsIn a national, cross-sectional study AR patients (2-70 y) seen by allergists underwent blinded skin prick testing with a panel of 18 allergens and completed a validated questionnaire on AR phenotypes.Results628 patients were recruited. The major sensitizing allergen was house dust mite (HDM) (56%), followed by Bermuda grass (26%), ash (24%), oak (23%) and mesquite (21%) pollen, cat (22%) and cockroach (21%). Patients living in the tropical region were almost exclusively sensitized to HDM (87%). In the central agricultural zones sensitization is primarily to grass and tree pollen. Nationwide, most study subjects had perennial (82.2%), intermittent (56.5%) and moderate-severe (84.7%) AR. Sensitization was not related to the intermittent-persistent AR classification or to AR severity; seasonal AR was associated with tree (p < 0.05) and grass pollen sensitization (p < 0.01). HDM sensitization was more frequent in children (0-11 y) and adolescents (12-17 y) (subtropical region: p < 0.0005; tropical region p < 0.05), but pollen sensitization becomes more important in the adult patients visiting allergists (Adults vs children + adolescents for tree pollen: p < 0.0001, weeds: p < 0.0005).ConclusionsIn a country with (sub)tropical climate zones SPT sensitization patterns varied according to climatological zones; they were different from those found in Europe, HDM sensitization far outweighing pollen allergies and Bermuda grass and Ash pollen being the main grass and tree allergens, respectively. Pollen sensitization was related to SAR, but no relation between sensitization and intermittent-persistent AR or AR severity could be detected. Sensitization patterns vary with age (child HDM, adult pollen). Clinical implications of our findings are dual: only a few allergens –some region specific- cover the majority of sensitizations in (sub)tropical climate zones. This is of major importance for allergen manufacturers and immunotherapy planning. Secondly, patient selection in clinical trials should be based on the intermittent-persistent and severity classifications, rather than on the seasonal-perennial AR subtypes, especially when conducted in (sub)tropical countries.

Background: Patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis are susceptible to both nasal and ocular symptoms. The conjunctival provocation test (CPT) is an established diagnostic procedure used in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, particularly to document a patient's current reactivity to allergens. To date, there are no international guidelines defining the CPT. No approved evaluation method exists for interpreting CPT results. This paper aims to establish the digital analysis of macroimages as an objective, validated and standardized method for interpreting CPT results. Methods: In a clinical immunotherapy trial with 155 patients, treatment progress was documented based on the CPT. Local investigators used a symptom score to grade tearing, reddening and the patients' subjective perception of symptoms (mucosal irritation). A central observer rated conjunctival hyperemia via digital photography. Digital image analysis software was utilized to determine conjunctival hyperemia. Results: Spearman's correlation between the local investigators' and the central observer's ratings was r = 0.729 (p < 0.001); the percentage of total agreement was 48% (based on 739 photos). Digital image analysis (based on 48 photos) had a high percentage of total agreement with the central observer's ratings (69%) but a low percentage of total agreement with the investigators' ratings (38%). The corresponding correlations were r = 0.264 and 0.064, respectively. Conclusion: Photography-based rating by a central observer may represent a valuable supplement to the local investigator's assessment for making an objective evaluation of CPT results. Digital image analysis possesses the potential of being an objective evaluation method compared to the wide-spread subjective evaluation by the investigators.

ObjectiveTo investigate dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography for monitoring the effects of regorafenib on experimental colon carcinomas in rats by quantitative assessments of tumor microcirculation parameters with immunohistochemical validation.Materials and MethodsColon carcinoma xenografts (HT-29) implanted subcutaneously in female athymic rats (n = 15) were imaged at baseline and after a one-week treatment with regorafenib by dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (128-slice dual-source computed tomography). The therapy group (n = 7) received regorafenib daily (10 mg/kg bodyweight). Quantitative parameters of tumor microcirculation (plasma flow, mL/100 mL/min), endothelial permeability (PS, mL/100 mL/min), and tumor vascularity (plasma volume, %) were calculated using a 2-compartment uptake model. Dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography parameters were validated with immunohistochemical assessments of tumor microvascular density (CD-31), tumor cell apoptosis (TUNEL), and proliferation (Ki-67).ResultsRegorafenib suppressed tumor vascularity (15.7±5.3 to 5.5±3.5%; p<0.05) and tumor perfusion (12.8±2.3 to 8.8±2.9 mL/100 mL/min; p = 0.063). Significantly lower microvascular density was observed in the therapy group (CD-31; 48±10 vs. 113±25, p<0.05). In regorafenib-treated tumors, significantly more apoptotic cells (TUNEL; 11844±2927 vs. 5097±3463, p<0.05) were observed. Dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography tumor perfusion and tumor vascularity correlated significantly (p<0.05) with microvascular density (CD-31; r = 0.84 and 0.66) and inversely with apoptosis (TUNEL; r = −0.66 and −0.71).ConclusionsRegorafenib significantly suppressed tumor vascularity (plasma volume) quantified by dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography in experimental colon carcinomas in rats with good-to-moderate correlations to an immunohistochemical gold standard. Tumor response biomarkers assessed by dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography may be a promising future approach to a more personalized and targeted cancer therapy.

In the PAR group, the physicians' classification of INT-PER often goes astray. PER overdiagnoses might affect treatment decisions because PER is a more severe phenotype. VAS is useful to evaluate severity. In Mexican AR patients, rhinitis symptom phenotypes differ according to age and between private and PHC system patients.

No abstract

Recent research outlines the value of IHT as a therapeutic strategy for the treatment of COPD patients, leading to more efficient ventilation. Additionally, IHT might represent an attractive method to complement the known beneficial effects of exercise training and to rebalance early autonomic dysfunction in COPD patients. Future research examining the potential risks and benefits of IHT could pave the way for the development of new therapeutic approaches for patients suffering from bronchial asthma and COPD.

In a (sub)tropical country the SAR-PAR classification seems of limited value and bears poor relation with the INT-PER classification. INT is more frequent in the tropical zone. Because PER has been shown to relate to AR severity, clinical trials should select patients based on INT-PER combined with the severity cataloging because these make for a better treatment guide than SAR-PAR.

No abstract