Introduction:Vascular access devices are commonly inserted devices that facilitate the administration of fluids and drugs, as well as blood sampling. Despite their common use in clinical settings, these devices are prone to occlusion and failure, requiring replacement and exposing the patient to ongoing discomfort/pain, local vessel inflammation and risk of infection. A range of insertion and maintenance strategies are employed to optimize device performance; however, the evidence base for many of these mechanisms is limited and the mechanisms contributing to the failure of these devices are largely unknown.Aims/objectives:(1) To revisit existing understanding of blood, vessel physiology and biological fluid dynamics; (2) develop an understanding of the implications that different clinical practices have on vessel health, and (3) apply these understandings to vascular access device research and practice.Method:Narrative review of biomedical and bioengineering studies related to vascular access practice.Results/outcomes:Current vascular access device insertion and maintenance practice and policy are variable with limited clinical evidence to support the theoretical assumptions underpinning these regimens. This review demonstrates the physiological response to vascular access device insertion, flushing and infusion on the vein, blood components and blood flow. These appear to be associated with changes in intravascular fluid dynamics. Variable forces are at play that impact blood componentry and the endothelium. These may explain the mechanisms contributing to vascular access failure.Conclusion:This review provides an update to our current knowledge and understanding of vascular physiology and the hemodynamic response, challenging some previously held assumptions regarding vascular access device maintenance, which require further investigation.
Highlights Abstract Background: Peripheral intravenous venous catheters (PIVCs) are associated with a postinsertion failure incidence of 40%, yet the common maintenance and preventive strategy of saline flushing is poorly understood at a physiological level. Methods: We developed a human model of bilateral cephalic vein cannulation to study the impact of varied PIVC flushing frequency (high frequency, HF; low frequency, LF) over 5 hours on catheter failure (primary outcome), coagulation, platelet aggregation, and local tissue injury. Ultrasound was used in a subset to assess vascular diameter/catheter to vein, blood flow velocity, and thrombus formation. Results: Out of 34 catheters in 17 adult participants, 1/17 (6%) LF catheters failed, which was not significantly different from HF catheters (0/17). Platelet function, activated partial thromboplastin time, and tissue factor were also not different (P > 0.05). However, prothrombin time (PT) increased with HF versus LF after 5 hours (P < 0.05). Ultrasound demonstrated luminal thromboses in veins experiencing both HF (6/7) versus LF (5/7) conditions after 5 hours with nonsignificant changes in vascular diameter and blood flow velocity over time. Conclusions: Although no difference in PIVC failure was observed between HF and LF flushing conditions over 5 hours, greater flushing frequency increased PT time, suggesting delayed activation or consumption of extrinsic coagulation factors. This study also demonstrated feasibility in assessment of luminal thromboses, which were remarkably prevalent after PIVC placement, and changes in vascular diameter and blood flow. This manuscript illustrates that the development of a sensitive human model will be of great use for exploring the impact of interventions on reducing PIVC failure in the future.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.